CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
July 31, 2014, 02:24:50 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
102505 Posts in 12092 Topics by 4669 Members
Latest Member: paulmanta
* Home Help Search Login Register
+  CRG Discussion Forum
|-+  Camaro Research Group Discussion
| |-+  General Discussion
| | |-+  69 Z
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]  All Print
Author Topic: 69 Z  (Read 1550 times)
262jp
Member
***
Posts: 26


View Profile Email
« Reply #15 on: October 25, 2013, 03:50:05 PM »

Thanks to all who replied. The consensus is the rear end date is fine for the 12B build date.
Logged
cook_dw
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 826



View Profile Email
« Reply #16 on: October 25, 2013, 04:05:04 PM »

Technically, We said it was possible..  Kurt makes a valid point that he/we could narrow it down more with the vin.  You will still need the p-o-p or mso or other proof for it to be 100% correct.   Wink

I just want to make sure there is no confusion.

Hope everything checks out and works out.   Smiley
Logged

Darrell Cook
KurtS
CRG Coordinator
*****
Posts: 3165


View Profile Email
« Reply #17 on: October 25, 2013, 11:32:30 PM »

He sent me the info - data looks good. Smiley
Logged

Kurt S
CRG
Pages: 1 [2]  All Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.082 seconds with 17 queries.