CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
August 21, 2014, 06:57:10 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
103326 Posts in 12155 Topics by 4691 Members
Latest Member: 67Nick
* Home Help Search Login Register
+  CRG Discussion Forum
|-+  Camaro Research Group Discussion
| |-+  Restoration
| | |-+  Rust question
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: Rust question  (Read 805 times)
Jbyer8
Member
***
Posts: 56



View Profile Email
« on: October 22, 2013, 09:38:39 AM »

Looking at buying my very first gen 1 car. I'm not the most mechanically inclined person. I'm looking at purchasing a 1968 camaro with a stroker engine. I have not seen in person. Seller did tell me the only rust spot he's been able to find is on the "very bottom in the very front of both rear quarter panels". Obviously rust is a bad thing but how bad is it in this spot and what's a ball park price in fixing it? Ill will try and get pictures.
Logged
william
CRG Member
*****
Posts: 1162


View Profile Email
« Reply #1 on: October 23, 2013, 12:49:28 PM »

The seller is the LAST person on earth that will give you an unbiased answer to that question. You have to have the car inspected prior to purchse. Don't even consider not doing it.

'60s cars, not just Camaros, were not well made to begin with and were never intended to last 45 years. Perforation of body panels is the least of the rust concerns; structural components such as frame rails, floor, roof and cowl panels are common rust areas on Camaros. They are often patched up enough so as not to be obvious and the owner may not be aware of prior poor repairs. The car needs to be thoroughly inspected on a lift by someone who knows where to look and what to look for. Pictures won't get the job done.
Logged
68camaroz28
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 940



View Profile Email
« Reply #2 on: October 24, 2013, 05:31:16 PM »

William is 100% correct! I've seen too many cars even after review were many times worse when the paint was removed and you saw first hand what one had.
Logged

Chick
68 Z/28 NOR 01B Orig motor/trans/rear
69 Z/28 NOR 07A Orig Block & GM Cross-ram/carbs
69 L34 Rest. Nova Father/Son Car
69 L78 Surv Nova Purch 4/69 31K miles
67 L89 Corv Tribute
68 Corv 427/400 Orig motor
07 Corv Z06
R 68Z build- http://www.camaros.net/forums/showthread.php?t=182584
sixt9x33rs
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 837



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: October 24, 2013, 10:33:01 PM »

Totally agree with both comments.
Logged

'69 RS Z/28 Olympic Gold, 711
Flat hood no spoiler, black top, endura, 4:10
POP 39,000
69 X77 Z/28 69 711 Original Paint Unrestored
'69 X66 Convertible Cortez Silver 712 black top Endura, auto, bumper guards, am/fm rear speaker 44k miles
janobyte
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 683


1968 z/28

bajcer@msn.com
View Profile Email
« Reply #4 on: October 24, 2013, 10:34:28 PM »

Many posts on this ,I just listed what was common problems-----over 30 years ago. By now all areas should be under suspicion. A good percentage of these cars may be on their 3rd build. Around here by the late 70's most were beginning to rot out. My friend/body man has stories of cars he fixed for people that spent big $$ for pretty pictures on line only to discover a host of problems under paint. Bright colors still hide a lot. Dark cars will always " wave " to you.
Logged
janobyte
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 683


1968 z/28

bajcer@msn.com
View Profile Email
« Reply #5 on: October 24, 2013, 10:39:06 PM »

And a stroker engine really means nothing. What's the complete package ?
Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.068 seconds with 18 queries.