Author Topic: 69 CAMARO'S LEFT ON THE ROAD  (Read 5224 times)

BULLITT65

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1877
    • View Profile
Re: 69 CAMARO'S LEFT ON THE ROAD
« Reply #30 on: September 19, 2013, 03:06:03 PM »
So what was the original cost of the cortez car? What was your father planning on doing with it without the vin and title? (parting it out)?
1969 garnet red Z/28 46k mile unrestored X77
Looking for 3192477 (front) spiral shocks 3192851 (rear) please
Looking for an original LOF soft ray windshield
Looking for original Delco side post negative battery cable part # 6297651AV

cook_dw

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1182
    • View Profile
Re: 69 CAMARO'S LEFT ON THE ROAD
« Reply #31 on: September 19, 2013, 03:36:15 PM »
The car was $500 & yes he just wanted to part it out.  He always said he didn't know why he didn't just go ahead & buy the tags & vin..  Guess he felt the body was too rough at the time..  It already had rot in the floors, trunk & quarters when he bought it.  But that's just the way it was back then..
Darrell Cook

1967 LeMans Blue SS/RS L35 clone
1968 Rallye Green SS L78 - unrestored original
1968 Matador Red Z28

BULLITT65

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1877
    • View Profile
Re: 69 CAMARO'S LEFT ON THE ROAD
« Reply #32 on: September 26, 2013, 02:56:18 AM »
UPDATE ON THE CAMARO IN THE LAKE:Trooper George Hoyle told the Daily Elk Citian newspaper that the Camaro was running when it hit the water. He said the driver was driving "a little faster than he should have." He says the impact damaged the radiator fan, a motor mount and the fuel pump.

Hoyle says the evidence suggests foul play was not involved and that the driver may have been unfamiliar with his surroundings.

So I think that puts it to rest. To bad they couldn't get their bearings fast enough to swim out of it.


Dusk Blue Z

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 88
    • View Profile
Re: 69 CAMARO'S LEFT ON THE ROAD
« Reply #33 on: September 26, 2013, 11:48:41 AM »
The noted damage is interesting, wonder if the broken motor mount had anything to do with putting the car in the water.

Mike

ZLP955

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 679
    • View Profile
Re: 69 CAMARO'S LEFT ON THE ROAD
« Reply #34 on: September 26, 2013, 12:09:18 PM »
The noted damage is interesting, wonder if the broken motor mount had anything to do with putting the car in the water.
Mike
Didn't the broken engine mount issue sometimes cause the throttle to stick open, hence the recall to fit interlocking mounts?
Tim - 04A VN '69 z/28 69-69 715 ex-E/MP

69Z28-RS

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2905
  • owner since 4-Apr-1976
    • View Profile
Re: 69 CAMARO'S LEFT ON THE ROAD
« Reply #35 on: September 26, 2013, 12:54:44 PM »
The noted damage is interesting, wonder if the broken motor mount had anything to do with putting the car in the water.
Mike
Didn't the broken engine mount issue sometimes cause the throttle to stick open, hence the recall to fit interlocking mounts?
Yes, a broken LHS motor mount *could* cause the accelerator to jam up (I had it happen to me with my dad's '63 Impala.. :) ...   but I doubt that would have been an issue with the car less than 2 yrs old?  and I don't believe it had a HP engine in it...  the mount could have broken as a result of hitting the water at speed...
Gary W / 09C 69Z28-RS, 72 B 720 cowl console rosewood tint
69 Corvette convertible, silver/black 350 hp,
60 Corvette white/red, 72 Corvette coupe, '70 Mach I 
90 ZR1 red/red #246, 90 ZR1 white/gray #2466
72 El Camino, '55-'56-'57 Nomads, '55-'57 B/A Sedan