CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
September 17, 2014, 04:35:04 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
104471 Posts in 12233 Topics by 4716 Members
Latest Member: Hgtech
* Home Help Search Login Register
+  CRG Discussion Forum
|-+  Camaro Research Group Discussion
| |-+  Originality
| | |-+  Engine hook bolts on manifold
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5  All Print
Author Topic: Engine hook bolts on manifold  (Read 9066 times)
jdv69z
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 641


69 RS Z/28 52E


View Profile Email
« Reply #30 on: July 09, 2013, 07:49:37 AM »

So were all the bolts used on the intake manifold the same head marking? I removed some recently that have no marking at all. Then they would not be original I assume? The motor had minimal work done to it before my ownership, so I would not have thought these to be replaced?  Hex head and Had washers underneath as well. Guess the washers prevent damage to the aluminum of the manifold.
Jimmy one other thing on the manifold bolts....my understanding is that (and it may be wrong) the manifold bolts were first installed at the engine plant and they were all the short ones.  When the engine arrived at the auto assembly plant dress line, the short bolts were removed and the other ones added as the equipment was installed.  Thus, you could have different head stampings because you are dealing with two different plants.

Wouldn't the engine hooks have been installed at the Flint engine assembly plant? The whole reason they are there is for handling the engines assemblies from Flint to the assembly plant,  the dress line, and to final chassis install I think? So if that's true, then whatever bolts were used for the hooks were installed at the Flint engine plant.
Logged

Jimmy V.
JohnZ
CRG Member
*****
Posts: 4101


View Profile Email
« Reply #31 on: July 09, 2013, 10:09:17 AM »

Jimmy one other thing on the manifold bolts....my understanding is that (and it may be wrong) the manifold bolts were first installed at the engine plant and they were all the short ones.  When the engine arrived at the auto assembly plant dress line, the short bolts were removed and the other ones added as the equipment was installed.  Thus, you could have different head stampings because you are dealing with two different plants.

Wouldn't the engine hooks have been installed at the Flint engine assembly plant? The whole reason they are there is for handling the engines assemblies from Flint to the assembly plant,  the dress line, and to final chassis install I think? So if that's true, then whatever bolts were used for the hooks were installed at the Flint engine plant.

The engine lift hooks were installed at the engine plants, and weren't touched at the car assembly plants.
Logged

'69 Z/28
Fathom Green
CRG
1968 Z28
Member
***
Posts: 434


View Profile Email
« Reply #32 on: July 09, 2013, 01:02:28 PM »

Agreed on the lift hooks.....was reading over on the Supercar Registry last night and got a good education.  But, back to Jimmy's question, it still appears that there was at least two different length bolts and the possibility of different head markings.
Logged

Jerry G.

Z28-1968-07C-Norwood
Ermine White, Red Std. Interior
2 Owner, 38,000 miles
Edgemontvillage
Member
***
Posts: 123



View Profile Email
« Reply #33 on: July 09, 2013, 04:12:26 PM »

1. Were the intake bolt heads and/or lift hooks brush painted before or after installation? Is there any evidence of silver paint brushed on the intake manifold?
2. What shade and gloss (of silver) was used? Argent?
Logged

Lloyd
1969 RS Z/28 10 10 Preservation
JohnZ
CRG Member
*****
Posts: 4101


View Profile Email
« Reply #34 on: July 10, 2013, 12:36:20 PM »


2. What shade and gloss (of silver) was used? Argent?


Try Krylon "dull aluminum".
Logged

'69 Z/28
Fathom Green
CRG
MO
Member
***
Posts: 301


View Profile
« Reply #35 on: July 13, 2013, 10:26:03 PM »

Edgemontvillage was referring to the engine orange on the head surface between the valve cover and intake manifold... ie. the upper part of the machined surface for intake gasket...  which normally would not get painted on such an engine (with aluminum manifold and aluminum valve covers)..

I may be off base on this, and please correct me if I am. When engines with aluminum manifolds and valve covers were built, a shield was used to keep as much paint off of them as possible. That area of the head would have been painted, but maybe not as much as the rest and burned off leaving the impression that it had never been painted. On assembly line cars, orange over-spray could be seen on the manifold/valve covers verifying that point. Some restorers do not want to see assembly line features like that and prefer to paint the head complete and then install the manifold, eliminating the over-spray from it. Personally, I like the assembly line defects. 
Logged
69Z28-RS
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2388


owner since '76


View Profile Email
« Reply #36 on: July 13, 2013, 11:22:53 PM »

No, I don't agree.  There would be no reason to even try, as it would be futile to have attempted to paint that little sliver of 'head' between the aluminum intake and aluminum valve cover using the crude masks they had to use. 
I've never seen factory paint in that area on such a car (with aluminum intake and aluminum VC), but what you do in rebuilding your own car is your business..   Smiley
Logged

Gary W.  /  69Z28-RS, 72 B 720 cowl console rosewood all tint
69 Corvette convertible, silver/black 350 hp,
60 Corvette white/red, 72 Corvette coupe (2), 
90 ZR1 red/red #246, 90 ZR1 white/gray #2466
72 El Camino, '55 Nomad, '57 Nomad, '57 B/A Sedan
Charley
Member
***
Posts: 413


View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #37 on: July 14, 2013, 12:18:44 AM »

Edgemontvillage was referring to the engine orange on the head surface between the valve cover and intake manifold... ie. the upper part of the machined surface for intake gasket...  which normally would not get painted on such an engine (with aluminum manifold and aluminum valve covers)..

I may be off base on this, and please correct me if I am. When engines with aluminum manifolds and valve covers were built, a shield was used to keep as much paint off of them as possible. That area of the head would have been painted, but maybe not as much as the rest and burned off leaving the impression that it had never been painted. On assembly line cars, orange over-spray could be seen on the manifold/valve covers verifying that point. Some restorers do not want to see assembly line features like that and prefer to paint the head complete and then install the manifold, eliminating the over-spray from it. Personally, I like the assembly line defects. 


I have never seen any assembly pics like that. My 1100 mile 70 Z had no evidence of that at all. It has orange paint on the plug wire stands that were done with a brush.
Logged

Edgemontvillage
Member
***
Posts: 123



View Profile Email
« Reply #38 on: July 14, 2013, 09:10:37 AM »




I have never seen any assembly pics like that. My 1100 mile 70 Z had no evidence of that at all. It has orange paint on the plug wire stands that were done with a brush.


Charley, would love to see a close up photo of the brush work on the plug wire stands.
Logged

Lloyd
1969 RS Z/28 10 10 Preservation
Charley
Member
***
Posts: 413


View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #39 on: July 14, 2013, 09:18:43 AM »

Should be some on  www.1970z28camaro.com
Logged

Charley
Member
***
Posts: 413


View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #40 on: July 14, 2013, 09:28:11 AM »

I just looked and there are a bunch of detail pics that show the silver paint on the intake bolts, bare head area next to intake, engine lift brackets and the dist hold down clamp and bolt. Also at least one good pic of the brush paint on the plug wire stand. Somebody smarter than me can figure out how to post them here.
Logged

MO
Member
***
Posts: 301


View Profile
« Reply #41 on: July 14, 2013, 11:36:31 AM »

Thanks for the info. I assume then that the restored cars that I have seen with over-spray there, are over-restored.
Logged
69Z28freak
Member
***
Posts: 362



View Profile
« Reply #42 on: July 14, 2013, 12:23:31 PM »

Should be some on  www.1970z28camaro.com

Very nice pictures Charley. Thanks for posting.
Logged

Mike 1969 Grandma Camaro
Charley
Member
***
Posts: 413


View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #43 on: July 14, 2013, 12:49:41 PM »

Feel free to post them over here. I have tried just uploading here but the size limit is too small to get any detail. Maybe someone can link them ?
Logged

69Z28
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 885


69 X33D80 Z28


View Profile
« Reply #44 on: July 14, 2013, 01:02:47 PM »

That 70 Z28 is sharp. Was looking at the pics of what is being discussed here and was wondering if the 69 Z28 was the same. Were all the intake bolts painted silver or natural? How about the lift hooks and the bolts on the lift hooks? I'm gonna assume the lift hooks were painted silver, but were any painted orange with the aluminum intake? And 'HAND' painted spark plug wire stands? Probably a paint brush right? I can see brush strokes on the wire stand by the brake booster. Unusual, I would have never thought that. On the lift hook bolts, with a loose washer or washer part of the head?

Something else that caught my eye was the shielding around the points in the distributor. Pretty neat part. Must of had some radio noise or some sort of interference.
Logged

GaryC

'UNRESTORED' 1969 Cortez Silver X33D80 Z28
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5  All Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.335 seconds with 18 queries.