Author Topic: 69 Z-28 for real?  (Read 1829 times)

100pctvet

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 5
    • View Profile
69 Z-28 for real?
« on: June 27, 2013, 06:42:31 AM »
My 69 has a cowl tag as follows:

ST69 12437     NO232640BDX
Trim 713    52   8   PNT
    050         X-33    1

Vin  124379N645609

Been told it is a real Z-28, Red with black vinyl top, black houndstooth interior. The car was backhalved before I bought it years ago. Now has a 30 over 402 big block.

ZLP955

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 743
    • View Profile
Re: 69 Z-28 for real?
« Reply #1 on: June 27, 2013, 06:54:02 AM »
If you can post a crisp, hi-res photo of the trim tag, the guys here will be able to confirm if it's a genuine trim tag.
Tim - 04A VN '69 z/28 69-69 715 ex-E/MP

Mark

  • CRG Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 994
    • View Profile
Re: 69 Z-28 for real?
« Reply #2 on: June 27, 2013, 10:33:15 AM »
Theres so many typos in that tag info, its impossible to tell at this point, but if the body number is anywhere near correct its way out of sequence for a mid May of 69 car.
Mark C.
1969 Indy Pace Car
350/300HP RPO Z11

100pctvet

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 5
    • View Profile
Re: 69 Z-28 for real?
« Reply #3 on: June 27, 2013, 03:52:42 PM »
Lets see if this will post. I assume the line lock was not standard from Norwood. Just kiddin.

JohnZ

  • CRG Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4261
    • View Profile
Re: 69 Z-28 for real?
« Reply #4 on: June 27, 2013, 04:05:11 PM »
Theres so many typos in that tag info, its impossible to tell at this point, but if the body number is anywhere near correct its way out of sequence for a mid May of 69 car.

That body number is over 32,000 units earlier than my 02D car.
'69 Z/28
Fathom Green
CRG

Ed_B

  • CRG Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2333
    • View Profile
Re: 69 Z-28 for real?
« Reply #5 on: June 27, 2013, 04:13:40 PM »
From the picture, the body number looks like 326404 to me. The build date appears to be 05 something. The OP posted 050, so I'm assuming it's probably 05C or 05D. Terry, can you verify the body number and the date?

Ed

BULLITT65

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1964
    • View Profile
Re: 69 Z-28 for real?
« Reply #6 on: June 27, 2013, 05:39:12 PM »
I know what an X33 code is, but I don't know what an X33-1 means . The paint code is 52 "B"  (for black vinyl top) not 8.
1969 garnet red Z/28 46k mile unrestored X77
Looking for 3192477 (front) spiral shocks 3192851 (rear) please
Looking for an original LOF soft ray windshield
Looking for original Delco side post negative battery cable part # 6297651AV

jdv69z

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 722
  • 69 RS Z/28 52E
    • View Profile
Re: 69 Z-28 for real?
« Reply #7 on: June 27, 2013, 06:44:20 PM »
I'll take a guess: Body = 326404 like Ed Said; Build week 05C. That would fit.
Jimmy V.

100pctvet

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 5
    • View Profile
Re: 69 Z-28 for real?
« Reply #8 on: June 27, 2013, 09:01:02 PM »
I should have given you'all a better picture. Let's try this.

dannystarr

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1047
    • View Profile
Re: 69 Z-28 for real?
« Reply #9 on: June 27, 2013, 11:09:53 PM »
A Little closer eh.... Danny

MyRed67

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 774
  • SZZLN 67
    • View Profile
Re: 69 Z-28 for real?
« Reply #10 on: June 28, 2013, 12:16:37 AM »
I know what an X33 code is, but I don't know what an X33-1 means . The paint code is 52 "B"  (for black vinyl top) not 8.
I'm guessing that is 1 of the typos.  It doesn't show in the pic. posted.
1967 Camaro  LOS  11A
Original Engine   Z - Tribute
Mike C.    NW - Illinois

william

  • CRG Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1285
    • View Profile
Re: 69 Z-28 for real?
« Reply #11 on: June 28, 2013, 12:39:22 AM »
Looks to be the real deal to me.

ZLP955

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 743
    • View Profile
Re: 69 Z-28 for real?
« Reply #12 on: June 28, 2013, 01:32:51 AM »
Nice color combination.
Tim - 04A VN '69 z/28 69-69 715 ex-E/MP