CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2014, 09:50:01 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
97196 Posts in 11690 Topics by 4578 Members
Latest Member: ronhill
* Home Help Search Login Register
+  CRG Discussion Forum
|-+  Camaro Research Group Discussion
| |-+  General Discussion
| | |-+  early vs. late 68 Front spoiler
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: early vs. late 68 Front spoiler  (Read 759 times)
MyRed67
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 645


SZZLN 67

michael-l.campbell@hotmail.com
View Profile
« on: May 30, 2013, 06:30:14 PM »

  Can someone tell me the difference in "early" and "late" 68 Front spoiler?  I know that the early should have "pebble" finish, vs. smooth on the "late".  Can someone post the length of each?  I also know that the "early" was referred to as the short version, and required no brackets, vs. 3  Brackets on the later version.  Thanks!
Logged

1967 Camaro  LOS  11A
Original Engine   Z - Tribute
Mike C.    NW - Illinois
Ed Bertrand
CRG Member
*****
Posts: 2282



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #1 on: May 30, 2013, 07:19:53 PM »

After many years of research, we've concluded that there was only one spoiler used in 1968 production. It was textured, pointed almost 90 degrees down and didn't use any brackets. The repop is one of the few repop items that actually got it right!

HERE IT IS.

Ed
Logged

Ed Bertrand
CRG Member
MyRed67
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 645


SZZLN 67

michael-l.campbell@hotmail.com
View Profile
« Reply #2 on: May 30, 2013, 07:48:29 PM »

Thanks Ed!
Logged

1967 Camaro  LOS  11A
Original Engine   Z - Tribute
Mike C.    NW - Illinois
cook_dw
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 582



View Profile Email
« Reply #3 on: May 30, 2013, 09:40:47 PM »

Edit:  nevermind I misread your post Ed.
Logged

Darrell Cook
1967, 8 & 9 Camaros
RGR
Red Gorilla Restorations
All your restoration and plating needs..
email at redgorillarestorations@gmail.com
ggtsvnv
Member
***
Posts: 138


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: June 01, 2013, 03:35:36 PM »

Does anyone have a picture of both spoilers installed?  I thought there were two different ones also, but if not I would like to see how both fit and look.
Logged
Ed Bertrand
CRG Member
*****
Posts: 2282



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #5 on: June 01, 2013, 09:04:02 PM »

Here's the correct 1980 D80 spoiler.

Ed
Logged

Ed Bertrand
CRG Member
ggtsvnv
Member
***
Posts: 138


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: June 01, 2013, 09:35:39 PM »

my next question is do the correct ones bend as driving down the road?  I have seen a few cars mustangs, cuda's and others where as they are driving down the highway the front spoiler is all bent out of shape from the air hitting it. Always looked bad to me and while I want my car to be correct I don't want to look like a cheap Ford or Mopar L.O.L..

Logged
mickeystoys69RSSS
Member
***
Posts: 240



View Profile
« Reply #7 on: June 02, 2013, 11:38:56 AM »

Are these for the '68 model year only, or were they used on the next model year until supply was exhaused? For example, was this spoiler used on a Nov. '68 built 1969 model, or did the '69 model have it own spoiler with the support bars at the start of the '69 model production in 1968?
Logged
Ed Bertrand
CRG Member
*****
Posts: 2282



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #8 on: June 02, 2013, 09:24:46 PM »

Quote
my next question is do the correct ones bend as driving down the road?

Quote
Are these for the '68 model year only, or were they used on the next model year until supply was exhaused?

I spoke to Troy (I don't have one on my car), and he said it probably moves a little but not enough that would be seen with the naked eye. He also said no, that spoiler was only used in 68 because the lower valance is a different design along the bottom lip/flange in 69. The 68 spoiler would not fit in this area due to the design change where the license plate bracket had two tabs that attach to the bottom lip of the valance instead of bolting to the front face like in 67-68.

Ed
Logged

Ed Bertrand
CRG Member
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.099 seconds with 18 queries.