CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
November 24, 2014, 11:25:23 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
106525 Posts in 12421 Topics by 4787 Members
Latest Member: Oilron14
* Home Help Search Login Register
+  CRG Discussion Forum
|-+  Camaro Research Group Discussion
| |-+  Restoration
| | |-+  302 Crank Pulley not working on 350 LT1
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2  All Print
Author Topic: 302 Crank Pulley not working on 350 LT1  (Read 7587 times)
69Z28freak
Member
***
Posts: 363



View Profile
« on: May 28, 2013, 02:47:38 AM »

I started to mock up my motor with all of the accessory brackets and hardware and discovered that it looks like the 302 harmonic balancer pulley will not line up with the power steering and water pump pulleys. It appears that the 350 harmonic balancer is not as wide as the 302 harmonic balancer, which means that the crank pulley sits about 1/4 inch back out of alignment.



Should I use a LT1 350 crank pulley?



The water pump pulley is a 302 Pulley as is the power steering pulley.



The alternator and brackets are all stock 302 parts.



It looks like the everything lines up except the crank pulley. I used all stock 302 parts thinking that everything would like up ok, but, that is not the case.



Has anyone come across this situation before. Would the 350 LT1 pulley solve my dilemma?
« Last Edit: May 28, 2013, 03:53:17 AM by 69Z28freak » Logged

Mike 1969 Grandma Camaro
z28z11
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 637


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: May 28, 2013, 08:23:24 AM »

It probably will help line things up, but there is still the spector of mixing deep groove and shallow, LP groove pulleys - you might have to change belt lengths slightly to compensate for the change in pitch (alternator adjustment range ?). You didn't picture it, but are you using a 3.2 DG alternator pulley as well ?

If you don't have your original 302 balancer, or a good used one, I could see where it's easier to change the pulley rather than pick up a (correct) balancer - I spotted a couple on eBay recently headed into the stratosphere in price - talk about speculation -

Regards,
Steve
Logged

1968 Z28 BRG/W
1969 Z28 X77 LeMans/W
1969 X66 L78 Cortez/BVT
1969 Z11 L48
68Zproject
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1625



View Profile Email
« Reply #2 on: May 28, 2013, 08:45:58 AM »

Would part of the problem be the long water pump?
Logged

68Z28
JohnZ
CRG Member
*****
Posts: 4141


View Profile Email
« Reply #3 on: May 28, 2013, 09:33:58 AM »

With stock '69 302 pulleys, the forward belt track (closest to the radiator) drives the crank, A.I.R. pump, alternator, and water pump. The rearward belt track (closest to the engine) drives the power steering pump; see the "Base" diagram in the Assembly Manual, section N40, sheet A7, and the V-8 installation on sheet A4.
Logged

'69 Z/28
Fathom Green
CRG
OG69Z
Member
***
Posts: 114



View Profile
« Reply #4 on: May 28, 2013, 09:39:31 AM »

It's not real clear in your photos, but it appears your crankshaft pulley may not be fully seated. Make sure the back of the pulley is completely flush against the damper.

Bob
Logged
69Z28-RS
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2488


owner since '76


View Profile Email
« Reply #5 on: May 28, 2013, 11:22:07 AM »

And there is also the possibility that the harmonic damper is not fully seated on the crankshaft...?
Logged

Gary W.  /  69Z28-RS, 72 B 720 cowl console rosewood all tint
69 Corvette convertible, silver/black 350 hp,
60 Corvette white/red, 72 Corvette coupe (2), 
90 ZR1 red/red #246, 90 ZR1 white/gray #2466
72 El Camino, '55 Nomad, '57 Nomad, '57 B/A Sedan
69Z28freak
Member
***
Posts: 363



View Profile
« Reply #6 on: May 28, 2013, 02:16:39 PM »

It probably will help line things up, but there is still the spector of mixing deep groove and shallow, LP groove pulleys - you might have to change belt lengths slightly to compensate for the change in pitch (alternator adjustment range ?). You didn't picture it, but are you using a 3.2 DG alternator pulley as well ?

If you don't have your original 302 balancer, or a good used one, I could see where it's easier to change the pulley rather than pick up a (correct) balancer - I spotted a couple on eBay recently headed into the stratosphere in price - talk about speculation -

Regards,
Steve

Thanks Steve. All of the pulleys will be deep groove. I still need to find a power steering pulley, but all other are correct deep groove. My understanding is that the motor is balanced to that harmonic balancer. I am not 100% sure, but I thought it was the correct balancer for a 1970 350 LT1. Perhaps I should by finding if I can change teh balancer and what balancer I do have. Obviously my main goal is to have all of my pulleys line up correctly.
Logged

Mike 1969 Grandma Camaro
69Z28freak
Member
***
Posts: 363



View Profile
« Reply #7 on: May 28, 2013, 02:18:20 PM »

Would part of the problem be the long water pump?

Is my water pump not the correct water pump?
Logged

Mike 1969 Grandma Camaro
69Z28freak
Member
***
Posts: 363



View Profile
« Reply #8 on: May 28, 2013, 02:19:26 PM »

It's not real clear in your photos, but it appears your crankshaft pulley may not be fully seated. Make sure the back of the pulley is completely flush against the damper.

Bob

Thanks Bob I will check that. It is currently not tightened all of the way. I was just mocking up and it looked way out.
Logged

Mike 1969 Grandma Camaro
69Z28freak
Member
***
Posts: 363



View Profile
« Reply #9 on: May 28, 2013, 02:21:26 PM »

And there is also the possibility that the harmonic damper is not fully seated on the crankshaft...?

Thanks Gary I will check to see if the balancer is seated all the way. It appears the crank pulley is sitting back towards the motor 1/4 of an inch, so it actually needs to move forward. That is assuming that the water pump is correct of course. Something is out and causing the belts to not line up correctly. I want to sort it now before the motor goes into the car.
Logged

Mike 1969 Grandma Camaro
69Z28-RS
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2488


owner since '76


View Profile Email
« Reply #10 on: May 28, 2013, 02:29:08 PM »

Your other pulleys (alternator, WP, smog) should line up with the outermost crank groove (see John Z's post), so actually your crank pulley is too far away from your engine for that to happen... and *the crank pulley* needs to go back towards the engine (per the photos)..  Only your PS pulley should line up with the groove closest to the engine.   

I'd suggest making sure your outer groove of the crank pulley first lines up with the water pump pulley, and then make everything else lines up appropriately after that.
Logged

Gary W.  /  69Z28-RS, 72 B 720 cowl console rosewood all tint
69 Corvette convertible, silver/black 350 hp,
60 Corvette white/red, 72 Corvette coupe (2), 
90 ZR1 red/red #246, 90 ZR1 white/gray #2466
72 El Camino, '55 Nomad, '57 Nomad, '57 B/A Sedan
69Z28freak
Member
***
Posts: 363



View Profile
« Reply #11 on: May 28, 2013, 02:36:10 PM »

Your other pulleys (alternator, WP, smog) should line up with the outermost crank groove (see John Z's post), so actually your crank pulley is too far away from your engine for that to happen... and *the crank pulley* needs to go back towards the engine (per the photos)..  Only your PS pulley should line up with the groove closest to the engine.   

I'd suggest making sure your outer groove of the crank pulley first lines up with the water pump pulley, and then make everything else lines up appropriately after that.


Thanks Gary. Looks like this situation requires more investigation. I guess I also need to confirm that I have the correct water pump and power steering set up as well as harmonic balancer. However I do need a starting place for reference and them work from there.
Logged

Mike 1969 Grandma Camaro
lynnbilodeau
Member
***
Posts: 264


View Profile Email
« Reply #12 on: May 28, 2013, 07:37:30 PM »

The FRONT face of the 302 and the LT-1 pulley should be identical spacing from the engine block.

Yes they are different thicknesses, but start out as the same casting (at least the later 302) and the back side is machined differently.

You have another problem.  Not any repop pulleys in that group are there?  They are crap.
Logged
69Z28freak
Member
***
Posts: 363



View Profile
« Reply #13 on: May 28, 2013, 07:53:25 PM »

The FRONT face of the 302 and the LT-1 pulley should be identical spacing from the engine block.

Yes they are different thicknesses, but start out as the same casting (at least the later 302) and the back side is machined differently.

You have another problem.  Not any repop pulleys in that group are there?  They are crap.

I am not using any repop pulleys. Only original 302 oulleys at this point.
Logged

Mike 1969 Grandma Camaro
z28z11
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 637


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: May 29, 2013, 12:13:32 AM »

Here's a little reference you can check - hard to see in the pics, but the width of the balancer is slightly more than 1.50", plus the area around the hub (front face) projects another .250" to give it a total width of 1.750 from the back edge to the pulley mounting face. The inner hub should stop on the crank camshaft gear when fully seated - it's real tough to get it too deep, unless for some reason the crank gear is thinner than spec. If your current balancer measures up, you can eliminate that from the puzzle and start with the crank gear, and work out from there.

I have my original balancer hidden somewhere in the Black Hole of Calcutta (my garage), but I'm sure it is identical to the NOS House/Bedroom Closet Stock pictured here. If you need any additional measurements, let me know.

Regards,
Steve
Logged

1968 Z28 BRG/W
1969 Z28 X77 LeMans/W
1969 X66 L78 Cortez/BVT
1969 Z11 L48
Pages: [1] 2  All Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.104 seconds with 18 queries.