CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
September 18, 2014, 02:48:16 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
104521 Posts in 12235 Topics by 4716 Members
Latest Member: Hgtech
* Home Help Search Login Register
+  CRG Discussion Forum
|-+  Camaro Research Group Discussion
| |-+  Decoding/Numbers
| | |-+  your thoughts on date code 302
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]  All Print
Author Topic: your thoughts on date code 302  (Read 7421 times)
firstgenaddict
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1229



View Profile WWW
« Reply #15 on: August 18, 2006, 08:09:09 PM »

19N640143 can't quite make out the first number after the N but being an 05A it wouldn't be anything but a 6 and the 2nd 4 could be a different number...
 As to why someone would stamp it down by the oil filter is because that is where the May built cars would have been stamped and it would be easier to pass off as a matching number engine.
Deck a block that has no vin at the bell housing flange... then restamp the build date and suffix code, then stamp a Vin on the bell housing flange, it is easier for an unscrupulous seller to explain that the engine block was "decked along time ago during a rebuild" or "was decked inadvertently but the vin on 69's is down by the oil filter so it has matching numbers."

Does the car have a POP? If so it will have the engine build date on it.

Logged

James
Collectin' Camaro's since "Only Rednecks drove them"
 
Check out the Black 69 RS/Z28 45k mile Survivor and the Lemans Blue 69 Z 10D frame off...
https://picasaweb.google.com/112392262205377424364/1969_Z28_Restoration
KurtS
CRG Coordinator
*****
Posts: 3205


View Profile Email
« Reply #16 on: August 18, 2006, 10:35:12 PM »

That pad is restamped.
Logged

Kurt S
CRG
RamAirDave
Member
***
Posts: 334


RamAirDave
View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #17 on: August 18, 2006, 11:11:32 PM »

That pad is restamped.

definately
Logged

"Build them how the designers and engineers envisioned them to be"

www.TheMuscleCarGuys.com
Flowjoe
Member
***
Posts: 340


View Profile Email
« Reply #18 on: August 18, 2006, 11:21:30 PM »

That pad is restamped.
As ever, A man of few words ;-)

I don't see this fellow very often, so now the question is whether or not to share the above info wiht him and burst his bubble.  He's not looking to sell the car...I think it's a keeper at this point.  I figured out his quarters were replaced and let him know and he was kinda bummed about that (looks like GM not repro quarters were used and it is not a bad job by any means).  I know the tranny is not original to the car...don't recall the rear axle details. 


And no, there is no documentation to go with the car.

For my edification, at what point did it become standard practice to stamp the VIN by the oil filter?  I had alwasy thought it was possible that either location could be used, but having just checked the CRG site :-) I see  it is noted as a "mid-model year" change...since mid model year would normally be around January or so is that when the change over occurs?  Or since '69 is a long production year does it occur later?

I' going to go out and check my '69 307 car (which I got from the original owner) which was built in 05A at Norwood as well and see where it's VIN is stamped....Kurt, I think you took a picture of that pad along with the '67 coupe.
Logged
RamAirDave
Member
***
Posts: 334


RamAirDave
View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #19 on: August 18, 2006, 11:34:34 PM »

For NOR cars, the VIN stamp location changed around January.  LOS cars changed over a few months later.

Your 05A NOR 307 should be near the oil filter.  Will be tough to see.


dave
Logged

"Build them how the designers and engineers envisioned them to be"

www.TheMuscleCarGuys.com
firstgenaddict
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1229



View Profile WWW
« Reply #20 on: August 19, 2006, 02:01:29 AM »

If the original trans is in the car snap a pic of the Vin stamping on it and if you can get a better one of the engine Vin that would be great as well.
The pair of them should display the same characteristics.
 
Logged

James
Collectin' Camaro's since "Only Rednecks drove them"
 
Check out the Black 69 RS/Z28 45k mile Survivor and the Lemans Blue 69 Z 10D frame off...
https://picasaweb.google.com/112392262205377424364/1969_Z28_Restoration
tyrfryrtom
Newbie
*
Posts: 8


View Profile
« Reply #21 on: August 19, 2006, 11:30:55 AM »

Wolfie,

You have a PM.

Logged
Flowjoe
Member
***
Posts: 340


View Profile Email
« Reply #22 on: August 19, 2006, 04:10:04 PM »

If the original trans is in the car snap a pic of the Vin stamping on it and if you can get a better one of the engine Vin that would be great as well.
The pair of them should display the same characteristics.
 

As previously mentioned the tranny is not original to the car....that much we knew.  So no help there.  I suppose that it could be the original block that was rebuilt/decked and then restamped but of course no way to prove that jsut supposition.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  All Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.22 seconds with 17 queries.