CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
August 01, 2014, 11:34:27 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
102556 Posts in 12096 Topics by 4669 Members
Latest Member: paulmanta
* Home Help Search Login Register
+  CRG Discussion Forum
|-+  Camaro Research Group Discussion
| |-+  Decoding/Numbers
| | |-+  Trim code
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]  All Print
Author Topic: Trim code  (Read 2238 times)
Mark
CRG Member
*****
Posts: 932



View Profile Email
« Reply #15 on: February 21, 2013, 07:44:21 AM »

Yes, once the tag was actually attached to the firewall of a tub, the car was built, all its parts and peices were on hand in the plant and the car was built, once a body started down the line it was not pulled off to wait for something to arrive at the factory, no one could contact the plant to make a change to the order.  The things people miss in the production of these cars is that the tags were made up as the orders came in and the bodies were preliminarily scheduled, parts were ordered and the tags were placed in groups that roughly equaled a days production.  This all happened several days to a week prior to the actual start of the build.  The plant could then make minor changes to when an actual car would be built, based on things like how many convertibles were in that days group as you couldn't have 2 convertibles coming down the line together as it would overload the trim shop - typical spacing is about 12 to 15 bodies, vinyl tops has a gap of about 5 to 7 bodies.  LA had different concerns as they were building multiple lines of cars at the same time.  If a part necessary for a particular car to be built was delayed in shipping, the tag for that body was pulled from its original position and put into another group scheduled to be built after that part arrived.
Logged

Mark C.
1969 Indy Pace Car
350/300HP RPO Z11
Frosty69
Member
***
Posts: 24



View Profile
« Reply #16 on: March 15, 2013, 01:37:06 AM »

My 69 has 01C  and I120. Production date on the broadcast sheet is Jan 15th.  January 1st  was a Wednesday so the 01C matches if you count the partial week as week 1. The first Monday was the 6th so if I am understanding correct this would be the A day, Tuesday the 7th the B day and so on. If that is the case and assuming a 5 day work week then the 15th would be H? Does that mean an extra day was worked between the 6th and 15th? How does this match up with the 01D U462 from the original post?
Logged
MO
Member
***
Posts: 300


View Profile
« Reply #17 on: March 17, 2013, 06:18:22 PM »

I see a lag from the 8th day (H) and the UOIT printed date (04-13-67) of 5 days so this gives credence to the CRG article, if I understand it correctly.
What I do find interesting is the printed UOIT date comes after the stamped cowl tag date. I would have thought the UOIT would be dated before the tag was stamped to indicate the options to prepare the body for but it is looking like the UOIT was printed after the cowl tag was stamped (and with the options).

There is a five day difference between my TT and UIOT also. And the TT is dated earlier. I was under the impression that the TT was made from the information on the UIOT. So does that mean that the UOIT was predicting the actual build date?
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  All Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.073 seconds with 18 queries.