CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
November 26, 2014, 07:46:23 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
106606 Posts in 12428 Topics by 4790 Members
Latest Member: gmein
* Home Help Search Login Register
+  CRG Discussion Forum
|-+  Camaro Research Group Discussion
| |-+  General Discussion
| | |-+  '67 Camaro leaf springs
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: '67 Camaro leaf springs  (Read 744 times)
Vetteman61
Newbie
*
Posts: 17


View Profile
« on: January 23, 2013, 12:26:34 AM »

Will '67 and '68 Camaro leaf springs interchange as long as they match in relation to mono or multi leaf.  I have searched and found conversion info, but I'm unsure if I found a monoleaf '68 leaf spring if it would bolt right up to my '67 Camaro.

Thanks,
Brandon
Logged
x77-69z28
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 808



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: January 23, 2013, 02:41:29 AM »

Yes, they are the same
Logged

69 x77 burnished brown, 711 int 05A bought in 78
67 rs/ss 350 butternut yellow 4 speed 2nd owner
70 Z28 forrest green, green int, M40, bk vinyl roof PROJECT
99 SS hugger orange 6spd NO TTOPS bought new 1 of 54
11 cts-v blk diamond  edition wagon 556hp sick!
Ed Bertrand
CRG Member
*****
Posts: 2333


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: January 23, 2013, 09:57:23 AM »

Yes they will, but spring rates are dependant on a multitude of factors, so a spring from a 68 will fit, but the ride height may be different.

Ed
Logged
Vetteman61
Newbie
*
Posts: 17


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: January 23, 2013, 11:37:26 AM »

OK, thank you for the responses.




Brandon
Logged
vtfb68
Member
***
Posts: 375


View Profile Email
« Reply #4 on: January 23, 2013, 03:27:43 PM »

Ed,
 At what gas tank level, human weight,  did the factory calculate the spring capacities ? was there a formula?
  Victor
Logged

05C LA RS/SS U2 712 L34 M21 BR
08E LA RS Y2 749 L30 M35
"In the pursuit of accuracy"
Ed Bertrand
CRG Member
*****
Posts: 2333


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: January 23, 2013, 03:42:31 PM »

John can answer this better than I can, but the spring rates themselves were based on what options were added (or subtracted) to/from the car. In general, different springs rates were used to keep the "ride height" at a constant, compared with other Camaros.

With a few variances between years, this height was based on two basic conditions:

1. "As Shipped", which was the car, oil, water, 2 gallons of fuel and the recommended tire pressure (24lbs front and rear)
2. "Curb Weight", which was the car, oil, water, a full tank of fuel and the recommended tire pressure (24lbs front and rear)

For 1967, the measurements are on UPC 3, sheet A8. For 1968 you can see the measurements on UPC 0, sheet A11, and for 1969 it's on UPC 0, sheet A10.

There were a lot of other factors involved, but the above is the jist of what they were trying to accomplish.

Ed
Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.082 seconds with 17 queries.