Author Topic: VIN tag problem  (Read 7935 times)

BillOhio

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1179
    • View Profile
    • photobucket
Re: VIN tag problem
« Reply #15 on: February 10, 2023, 01:42:27 AM »
Kurt was it a whole car or shell? Maybe a shell explains the leaning look
1969 Z28, Burgandy, numbers matching, 12,900 miles
1968 RS 327 4 speed
1970 Z28 M22 4:10 bought from original owner
1961 Chrysler 300G convertible

KurtS

  • CRG Coordinator
  • *****
  • Posts: 5955
    • View Profile
Re: VIN tag problem
« Reply #16 on: February 10, 2023, 01:44:31 AM »
I only know what the seller posted.
Kurt S
CRG

Z282NV

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 109
    • View Profile
Re: VIN tag problem
« Reply #17 on: February 10, 2023, 02:07:36 PM »
If the VIN and trim tag are real for a 2D assembly time frame, the VIN of this Camaro is over 5000 cars away from the last VIN number on CRG database for February 1969. Shouldn't this be a March 1969 Camaro?
Joe
69 Camaro

william

  • CRG Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3184
    • View Profile
Re: VIN tag problem
« Reply #18 on: February 10, 2023, 03:45:31 PM »
N612301 was final-assembled on or about March 11, 1969.

Release date on the tag is not a reliable indicator of exactly when a Norwood car was built. 37 ZL-1 Camaros had 02D tags, none of them were built in February.
Learning more and more about less and less...

Z282NV

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 109
    • View Profile
Re: VIN tag problem
« Reply #19 on: February 10, 2023, 04:09:37 PM »
N612301 was final-assembled on or about March 11, 1969.

Release date on the tag is not a reliable indicator of exactly when a Norwood car was built. 37 ZL-1 Camaros had 02D tags, none of them were built in February.

Thanks for clearing that up William.
Joe
69 Camaro

67conv6cyl

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 503
    • View Profile
Re: VIN tag problem
« Reply #20 on: February 10, 2023, 10:00:30 PM »
What I find truly amazing is….everyone knows that today there are more fake  Z’s then they probably built originally…..one of the most cloned cars on the planet and even the clones that are admitted clones bring good sale prices.

Anybody that has one that’s real has gotta feel good knowing how desirable their car is…..after all not to many people cone cars that aren’t desirable to the masses.

BillOhio

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1179
    • View Profile
    • photobucket
Re: VIN tag problem
« Reply #21 on: February 14, 2023, 01:39:49 AM »
The seller posted the back side of the cowl stamp and looks like 2 sets of numbers
1969 Z28, Burgandy, numbers matching, 12,900 miles
1968 RS 327 4 speed
1970 Z28 M22 4:10 bought from original owner
1961 Chrysler 300G convertible

BULLITT65

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4480
    • View Profile
Re: VIN tag problem
« Reply #22 on: February 14, 2023, 03:42:49 AM »
I think a mirror was used so it shows the numbers from the underside. *But if someone was willing to remove tags, would they remove the upper section of the firewall and graft that in? many ways to skin cat it seems
1969 garnet red Z/28 46k mile unrestored X77
-Looking for 3192477 (front) spiral shocks 3192851 (rear)
-Looking for an original LOF soft ray windshield
-Looking for original Delco side post negative battery cable part # 6297651AV

 

anything