Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 10
41
General Discussion / Re: HOW WAS THEM CAMARO SHOWS
« Last post by BULLITT65 on June 29, 2015, 04:49:46 PM »
Yes please. Pics from all 3 for who ever has them... ;D
42
General Discussion / Re: HOW WAS THEM CAMARO SHOWS
« Last post by RUNUTZ on June 29, 2015, 04:12:05 PM »
Fredricksburg and Carlisle ....
43
Site Comments/Discussion / Re: Including URLs in Posts
« Last post by bcmiller on June 29, 2015, 04:05:27 PM »
Personally, I would like to see the whole link posted, but that's just me.
44
General Discussion / Re: HOW WAS THEM CAMARO SHOWS
« Last post by bcmiller on June 29, 2015, 04:01:09 PM »
Do you mean the Camaro Nationals over the weekend?
45
Decoding/Numbers / Re: Help to decode a SBC please
« Last post by cook_dw on June 29, 2015, 03:46:51 PM »
Not a re-stamp D.W., lol.

Thats what you call farm fresh..  You sure that stamp is legit?   ;D
46
Restoration / Re: Leaf spring Resto/Preservation
« Last post by SgtHawkUSMC on June 29, 2015, 03:46:32 PM »
I'll grab a couple more pics tonight when I get home. Thanks Darrell.
47
Restoration / Re: Leaf spring Resto/Preservation
« Last post by cook_dw on June 29, 2015, 03:42:34 PM »
Just for clarity post a pic of the whole spring.  But from what you have posted it looks correct.
48
Restoration / Re: Leaf spring Resto/Preservation
« Last post by SgtHawkUSMC on June 29, 2015, 03:36:58 PM »
Thanks guys. I'll pick up a gallon today and give it a shot. Before I go too crazy though... Those do look like original markings right? I searched, but I didn't come up with anything. If they aren't original I won't worry about them so much.
49
General Discussion / HOW WAS THEM CAMARO SHOWS
« Last post by RUNUTZ on June 29, 2015, 02:56:28 PM »
Any pics :)
50
Decoding/Numbers / Re: Help to decode a SBC please
« Last post by JohnZ on June 29, 2015, 02:19:42 PM »

??? Why ship a block to Michigan when you have a foundry? This seems a little suspect to my little bit of knowledge


We have researched this issue on 60's Corvettes, where there is evidence that a small number of 3858180 327 blocks were cast at Tonawanda and machined/assembled at Flint; had nothing to do with any production interruption or problem at the Saginaw Foundry - it was simply a continuing machinability audit to ensure that Tonawanda-cast blocks were totally interchangeable with Flint blocks through the Flint Machining and Assembly Departments. They're easy to spot, as they have the usual earmarks of a Tonawanda casting, but the pad machine code stamp starts with an "F" ('66 and earlier) or a "V" ('67 and later).
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 10