16
General Discussion / Re: 69 trim tag question
« on: March 25, 2019, 05:53:41 PM »
Only the tag was posted asking if it could be decided, the owner didn't post the rest of the car, sorry
News:
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Classified ads are not allowed on the forum.
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
17
General Discussion / Re: 69 trim tag question
« on: March 15, 2019, 08:36:27 PM »
So it was a midyear change for the rest of production?
18
General Discussion / 69 trim tag question
« on: March 15, 2019, 06:24:21 PM »
While I've seen LOS and NOR on the plant designation, VN for van nuys is one I've not seen before other than on a firebird site. Is this an anomaly or just not discussed often, for a 69 Camaro? Plus I'm not trying to decipher the tag, I just screen shot the tag to post my question.
19
General Discussion / Re: Happy Birthday to my Camaro
« on: February 28, 2019, 10:37:12 PM »
I enjoyed the read, I bought my 67 SS RS in Wichita few years back, I live in Kansas too
20
General Discussion / Re: Who would be interested in buying a replacement passenger seat cable?
« on: February 26, 2019, 04:00:54 AM »
Well I went out to garage to check out of curiosity and wow my car has the cable. 67 with deluxe interior
21
General Discussion / Re: Who would be interested in buying a replacement passenger seat cable?
« on: February 23, 2019, 10:03:55 PM »
This is great, for information. Was the cable standard on the 67? I never knew there was a cable ever, I'm only asking as if this is original?
22
General Discussion / Re: 1967 Chevrolet Camaro SS L78 396/375 4-Speed on BaT
« on: February 21, 2019, 06:59:34 PM »
The tag does look off, I know angles and lighting. The corporation stamping isn't crisp, a pic of the cars next to my cars tag, mine is all black looking
23
General Discussion / Re: 1967 Camaro built in 66 titled 1966
« on: February 18, 2019, 03:27:48 AM »
I'd agree, but he seems to think that makes it rare. I'd just never heard of the title method being discussed, I got my first car in mid 80s.
24
General Discussion / Re: 1967 Camaro built in 66 titled 1966
« on: February 16, 2019, 04:11:06 PM »
I agree on error, car is 67 period, no matter the title, I'm not arguing with the guy, I had just never heard of what he's trying to make out from back in 1966
25
General Discussion / Re: 1967 Camaro built in 66 titled 1966
« on: February 15, 2019, 02:19:51 PM »
If I'm not mistaken it's still just a 67 Camaro, but maybe the title being original and dated 66 is rare?
26
General Discussion / 1967 Camaro built in 66 titled 1966
« on: February 15, 2019, 02:17:20 PM »
This is way before my time, I'm not sure what the owner is trying to prove to me but he states back when you titled a car it was title the year not the year of the car, so he has a 1966 title for a 67 Camaro. I think he thinks this is a rarity, im not following what he's stating. I need an older person insight that was buying cars in the 60s to explain maybe
27
General Discussion / Re: Two questions of 69 Camaro options
« on: February 12, 2019, 03:10:42 AM »
I love the information, I was born in 71 and missed all the old high performance, verses smog dog 80s. To have seen all this firsthand would have been great, but at the time probably seemed mundane and not seem like it's future would become so rare.
28
General Discussion / Re: Two questions of 69 Camaro options
« on: February 09, 2019, 02:25:12 PM »
That is great information, thank you very much
29
General Discussion / Two questions of 69 Camaro options
« on: February 09, 2019, 01:14:42 PM »
Could you order a 69 Camaro with rally sport and copo 427 and not badge the car as an SS? And secondly if GM advertised the cowl induction for the Camaro as a super scoop, how was it labeled and sold by the dealer? Was it sold as super scoop or was it listed as cowl induction? I've read that Chevelle got the cowl induction name first. I wasn't born yet so I'm asking for clarification.
30
General Discussion / Re: First 67 Yenko Camaro Listed in Yenko inventory
« on: January 14, 2019, 11:57:08 PM »
I don't see anything in the museum post stating it was for sale, only that it was tuned up and cleaned up for pictures.