Messages

181

General Discussion / Re: Rare '69 SS ?

« on: January 02, 2016, 03:21:57 PM »

smitty. There are more camaro scammers than enthusiasts these days. If you are having trouble posting pictures, resize them on a resizing web site to make them smaller so they will post. I had help getting that figured out. After you post pics I'm sure you'll get plenty of help.

182

General Discussion / Re: 1969 Camaro Convertible Firewall cowl project

« on: January 02, 2016, 01:33:08 AM »

I still think of my self as newbie. I'm still learning. Just thought id say no doubt trim tag is fake. But if Muncie hole was cut from factory it is real SS,Z28 or COPO with manual trans right?

183

Mild Modifications / Re: Seat Belt Differences 68-9

« on: January 01, 2016, 10:59:49 PM »

Zoom in.

184

Mild Modifications / Re: Seat Belt Differences 68-9

« on: January 01, 2016, 10:55:43 PM »

Overall length 42.5.

185

Mild Modifications / Re: Seat Belt Differences 68-9

« on: January 01, 2016, 10:53:51 PM »

Shoulder belts in my 69 long gone before I purchased it. I do have a set from a 68 rs.

186

General Discussion / Re: 1969 Camaro Convertible Firewall cowl project

« on: January 01, 2016, 06:03:08 PM »

I stand corrected. Muncie hole could also indicate COPO or Z/28. But why fake an SS if it was factory COPO or Z/28?

187

General Discussion / Re: 1969 Camaro Convertible Firewall cowl project

« on: January 01, 2016, 04:40:57 PM »

Zooming in on trim tag. Date code is 09 A. VIN 9N679---. CRG general info, end of month reports, states the end of August 69 was VIN 9N678253. The numbers appear to be from same time period. If the Muncie speedo cable piercing is from factory, that would indicate factory SS with manual transmission. I think seller covered #'s to prevent CRG from exposing this project after it's completed and up for sale on e-bay.    http://www.camaros.org/geninfo.shtml

188

General Discussion / Rarest 69 Z/28 Ever

« on: December 29, 2015, 12:15:50 AM »

http://www.msn.com/en-us/autos/autos-midsize/with-its-hemi-crossram-check-out-the-rarest-1969-camaro-ever/ar-BBnXapC?ocid=spartandhp

189

General Discussion / Re: Saginaw trains rebuild

« on: December 25, 2015, 02:42:21 PM »

Imo. Forget the Saginaw transmission and high $$$ rear end. Spend that money on wide ratio Muncie and 8.5" rear end from 72 - 79 nova. Good luck.

190

General Discussion / Special paint code rs on ebay.

« on: December 24, 2015, 12:12:47 AM »

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Chevrolet-Camaro-RS/172035585421?_trksid=p2047675.c100010.m2109&_trkparms=aid%3D222007%26algo%3DSIC.MBE%26ao%3D1%26asc%3D34883%26meid%3D374a99aca7eb4ed7969c87c0d8bf513b%26pid%3D100010%26rk%3D2%26rkt%3D19%26mehot%3Dpp%26sd%3D231787036524

191

General Discussion / Original x11 ss born with 396?

« on: December 19, 2015, 01:13:03 AM »

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Chevrolet-Camaro-SS-/231787036524?forcerrptr=true&hash=item35f7957f6c:g:IWIAAOSwSdZWcrym&item=231787036524

192

General Discussion / Re: Garage sale camaro

« on: December 03, 2015, 09:19:21 PM »

The first owner won this car after the 70 models were out, but the letter informing him of winning is dated June 27, 1969. Can this be correct? The current owner thinks factory transmission was Muncie 4 speed. The letter from Standard Oil states "3 speed manual. I just thought that was odd.

193

General Discussion / Re: real z28?

« on: November 23, 2015, 10:45:30 PM »

https://atlanta.craigslist.org/atl/pts/5324786693.html

194

General Discussion / Re: real z28?

« on: November 23, 2015, 02:32:06 AM »

It was advertised as an inherntace car. I have called phone# and left voice mail  and text message with no results. And now its no longer on craiglist.

195

General Discussion / Re: real z28?

« on: November 23, 2015, 01:38:21 AM »

But what if they really don't know any better and will sell for $2000.