CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
October 22, 2014, 07:16:08 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
105631 Posts in 12335 Topics by 4753 Members
Latest Member: stpatrick
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: [1]
1  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: connecting rod reconditioning on: March 01, 2014, 09:25:28 AM
Greetings members,

I'm new to the forum. This "dimple" rod thing is new to me. Are we referring to the reinforcing gusset that bridges up from the I beam to the wrist pin? Is that the "dimple" that the name refers to? 
2  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Fuel pump codes on: January 18, 2014, 05:12:44 PM
I hope the mods don't mind me resurrecting this old thread and dusting it off.

I have a few questions concerning AC fuel pumps codes that I'd like to have answered. I have a motor date stamp of May 24, '67. My fuel pump has a date code of FH which would be June of '68. By what I've picked up from research and speaking with people, the motor should be dressed with components that are date stamped roughly a month earlier. So by my cyphering - that would call for a fuel pump date stamped as DG or possibly EG, correct?

I've also seen individuals refer to non-original pumps as being "service replacement correct". Are these replacement components something that a judge would view as acceptable? Can someone explain this to me?

Are there also AC pumps that were julian dated? If so, when to when?

Thanks to all that respond.
Pages: [1]
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.071 seconds with 19 queries.