CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
August 30, 2014, 01:26:04 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
103694 Posts in 12182 Topics by 4697 Members
Latest Member: greygoose01
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4
16  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: This is a good looking car! on: June 08, 2014, 10:04:46 PM
Back again....Car is in the Mecum auction this weekend in Seattle
http://www.mecum.com/auctions/lot_detail.cfm?LOT_ID=WA0614-191478&entryRow=119&lottype=car&startRow=109
17  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: What's it worth, untouched Cortez silver 69 RS Z on: June 08, 2014, 08:16:04 PM
ST 69 112437      NOR109427
TR      719                    69    69
08B

69 Zee..If you have the vin you might want to post it here for future searches. With RS and the color combo seems to me this car is a candidate to do the magic morph into a numbers matching car.
18  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: What's it worth, untouched Cortez silver 69 RS Z on: June 08, 2014, 02:06:44 PM
I'm going to guess its this car http://www.ebay.com/itm/Chevrolet-Camaro-Z-28-1969-Camaro-RS-Z-28-Project-Car-/121358494508?forcerrptr=true&hash=item1c4187ab2c&item=121358494508&pt=US_Cars_Trucks . If I'm right I think I would ask what your intentions are. If you plan to restore it for a profit then you would probably need to get it for free because without the original engine and trans the cost to restore it is likely going to exceed the finished value. Having said that it wouldnt surprise me to see someone pay 15k for it. Neat color combo.
19  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Ron Pratte collection on: June 02, 2014, 01:49:13 PM
going up for auction next year in scottsdale, wonder if the green 69 z28 will be there?
Is that the one with the 'RS' on the grille, the questionable history, the previous owner who surfaced and then disappeared amidst threats against him after commenting that the VIN attached to it came from a car he scrapped years prior, and that went for something like $129,000 a few years back


Classic Gary aren't you the previous owner?
20  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 1969 Z28, One Owner Carolina Blue Crossram JL8 on: May 19, 2014, 09:15:22 AM
Anybody have a pic of the trim tag for the 68 Yenko?

Someone else got the tag photo and posted it over on Team Camaro
http://www.camaros.net/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=73465&d=1400507980
21  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 67 Z stamp on: May 19, 2014, 07:40:44 AM
and winning bid was?


63k plus buyers commission..paint is amazing
22  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 1969 Z28, One Owner Carolina Blue Crossram JL8 on: May 19, 2014, 07:33:57 AM
[
Anybody have a pic of the trim tag for the 68 Yenko?
[/quote]

Fail on my end....just got the engine bay in total.
23  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 1969 Z28, One Owner Carolina Blue Crossram JL8 on: May 18, 2014, 04:00:58 PM
Went to Indy today and saw this car in person. As others have mentioned there are plenty of  things that are not right with it. For example, take a look at the attached photo of the firewall/cowl area. Not only is it a hard line between the colors but ithe black is wrapped up on the cowl as well. PTB stamps look like they were painted on by a kid. I wish someone could explain to me whats driving the price because I dont get it. I get that its a one off color and is heavy optioned but for my 450k (not that I have it lol) think I would much rather of had the 1300 mile 1968 Yenko parked next to it that sold for 320k. That car was absolutely gorgeous.
24  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 67 Z stamp on: May 17, 2014, 08:35:29 AM
That was the non RS car. Had replaced block . Had great letter from early owner complaining to gm that a rod bolt came loose and damaged the block. He had asked for a new throw out bearing when the motor was out and dealer forgot/didn't do it. Was upset it cost him $35 to get it fixed!

Hmmm..bad eyes on my part. Didnt realize there were not 1 but 2 67 Z28s in the auction. I see the one your talking about is actually going today. I'm heading to Indy today and going to stop by the auction tomorrow and catch the tail end of it. Hope I get a chance to see these cars before they leave.
25  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 67 Z stamp on: May 17, 2014, 01:29:03 AM
Sold for $104,000
26  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 1969 CAMARO Z-28 NUMBERS MATCHING DZ 302 4 SPEED HUGGER ORANGE RUST FREE on: May 14, 2014, 11:44:38 AM
Saw this ad as well. Anxious to see the photos of the stamps seller says he will be posting. Are there documented cases, as the seller claims, where the transmission and engine vin stamps dont match?
27  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Temecula ROD RUN on: April 30, 2014, 07:18:28 PM
That Jetfiire is so cool. I saw you at the show in Valley Center this weekend. I tried twice to introduce myself but couldn't seem to make it through the crowd that was always around the car. Sure is a conversation piece.
28  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Free to good home- H.O. poster on: April 28, 2014, 05:01:47 PM
Heck I'll take it...Hang it in the garage as a reminder that someday I need to paint my stripes black and put the vinyl top back on so my car will match the cowl tag Smiley
29  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: X-55 camaro on: April 25, 2014, 11:34:08 AM
You are correct X55 is an SS350 without style trim
30  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: This is a good looking car! on: April 09, 2014, 12:00:16 AM
Car has been sold twice at Barratt Jackson here:
http://www.barrett-jackson.com/application/onlinesubmission/lotdetails.aspx?ln=938&aid=221
and here:
http://www.barrett-jackson.com/application/onlinesubmission/lotdetails.aspx?ln=711&aid=443

Both times its was described as having a “correct” block. Now according to the ebay ad its numbers matching. Buyer beware.
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.341 seconds with 18 queries.