CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 23, 2014, 03:27:09 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
97442 Posts in 11712 Topics by 4581 Members
Latest Member: Cooper48
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 [2]
16  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Original Yenko Camaro Warrenty? on: June 26, 2013, 07:42:57 PM
Did the original Yenko Camaro's come with a GM warrenty or did the warrenty originate from the dealer?? Or no Warrenty?  Thanks-Larry
17  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Question on T-60 Option (Heavy Duty Battery)? 69 Z28 on: June 20, 2013, 02:21:40 PM
We all know that the T-60 Heavy Duty Battery was a option on the 69 Camaro. Did it come with Top Post
throughout the production year? We know the regular battery changed to side post earlier in the year. Did the
T-60 ever come with side post? If it did when did it happen? Also what was the battery number for the T-60; R59-R59S or??
Thanks in advance--Larry
18  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Need help/advice on changing exhaust systems on my 69 Z28. on: June 17, 2013, 04:59:46 PM
Just a followup; also talked to Allens Exhaust today. They said they could make a stainless steel chamber
exhaust (two transverse mufflers) for my car. It should be a R and R. Thinking I will go with this to avoid
another early muffler failure. Question: Will be S/S muffler be more or less loud? Or the same? Thanks-Larry
19  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Need help/advice on changing exhaust systems on my 69 Z28. on: June 17, 2013, 01:31:47 PM
No. The chambered exhaust is a totally different animal. Go on Gardner exhausts website. They are the best!

Thanks for the reply. I just talked to Gardner Exhaust and they are very helpful. They tell me though that all
of their exhaust systems are made out of aluminum.  Don't know if anybody makes stainless steel
systems but what is your thoughts on that? My 69 Z28 is a "trailer queen" and not run long enough to burn
all the water out of the system all the time; therefore the muffler will rust out from the inside. Idea's? Thanks-Larry
20  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Need help/advice on changing exhaust systems on my 69 Z28. on: June 16, 2013, 06:16:43 AM
My 69-Z28 has the NC8 option.(Chambered Pipes). They are on the rather loud side like most of them. Thinking to change the
system to the standard duel pipe muffler system. This is the one with the cross muffler that was used on the Z28's when Chevy
pulled the chambered exhaust as the standard system. I do not want to use the later system that also used resonators. Here is
my question: Will I still be able to use the front exhaust pipes that is on the car now. (Pipes from the exhaust manifolds to the rear
exhaust pipes) that connect to the muffler? Also can I still use the tail pipes that are on the car now? Thanks in advace-Larry
21  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Lacquer Vs. Enamel for the Camaro on: June 03, 2013, 08:00:43 AM
We all know the early Camaro's used lacquer paint and the newer ones use enamel. Does
anybody know what was the year of the changeover? Larry
22  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 1969 Z28 throttle rod attachment question? on: June 02, 2013, 04:38:19 PM
At the carburetor end, the Z/28 throttle rod fits in the SMALL hole directly below the LARGE hole in the throttle lever; the LARGE hole that takes a black rubber bushing and white nylon sleeve on the base V-8 isn't used on Z/28, L-34, L-35, and L-78. There should be no "play" at all in that attachment, which only takes an "E"-clip.

JohnZ: Thanks for the reply. My excessive play is in the lengthwise (In and out) rather than the diameter of the hole. It seems that the slot of
the rod(that holds the "E" clip should have been put closer to the throttle arm of the carb.IMHO  Larry
23  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 1969 Z28 throttle rod attachment question? on: June 02, 2013, 12:23:37 PM
The 'C' clip I think is actually called an E' clip isn't it? The rod on mine seemed a bit floppy on mine and although it's been a while since I looked I believe I filled in the slop with a tiny flat washer or two. I'll have to check. 

69Z28:  Thanks for the response. When throttle is pulled back
everything tightens up fine. May put some flat washers in.-Larrry
24  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 1969 Z28 throttle rod attachment question? on: June 02, 2013, 09:33:43 AM
Larry, the throttle rod has a C-shaped snap ring-type retainer at the carb lever, and a sleeve & bushing with split pin at the firewall throttle arm. If you have access to the factory assembly instruction manual (AIM), the linkage is shown on UPC Z28, sheet A4. If you don't have one, you can download a PDF version via this link.

ZLP955:

Thanks for the response. Yes I see it now; but still think there
is excessive movement but will have to live with it. Larry
25  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 1969 Z28 throttle rod attachment question? on: June 02, 2013, 06:37:59 AM
Follow Up: I guess the part ("C") above is technically called a "retainer"; thanks. How did it come from the factory? Anybody help. Larry
26  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / 1969 Z28 throttle rod attachment question? on: June 02, 2013, 01:43:38 AM
First post for me. Have a AACA Top Senior (Jerry MacNeish) certified 1969 Camaro Z28.
Here is my question: Does the throttle rod have anything more then that "C" type washer/nut
(not sure what you call them) on the shaft that attaches to the carb? It seems to have a
lot a play in it. Should there be a washer in there to take some of the play out?
Thanks in advace. Larry
Pages: 1 [2]
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.087 seconds with 18 queries.