CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2015, 11:52:33 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
112293 Posts in 12900 Topics by 4937 Members
Latest Member: 22rodman
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 20 21 [22] 23 24 ... 60
316  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Stripe delete on: June 05, 2014, 08:06:51 PM
No - on the trim tag of my Norwood built Z. (GG) Original owner verified  he ordered the car stripe delete , spoke with the man about 20 years ago who shot the stripes in 69-70. The 2nd owner had it done when he ordered the cowl hood through Milad Chevrolet.
317  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Heavy undercoating was it factory or dealer applied? on: June 04, 2014, 07:58:51 PM
uggg....don't want to be reminded, had many hours removing that gunk from underneath. The front wheel tubs were the worst, set up like concrete underneath. If Al paid $35 to have it done, he got his money's worth Cheesy

I believe the factory shot under the rear wheel wells and half (or so) the fronts. Not positive.

Your right Gary, road signs and undercoating "fixed" many a beaters Ohio floor.
318  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Maintenance / Re: Benchtest - 67 RS headlight motor on: June 03, 2014, 10:53:11 AM
If my memory is right, the 2 wires are open close. The neg. or ground goes to the case.

Think your memory is ok !
319  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Maintenance / Re: Benchtest - 67 RS headlight motor on: June 02, 2014, 07:38:44 PM
Check the motor 1st, then work your way back.

If motor ok ,see if you have power (12 v) at the wires you plugged in to your motor.


There are 2 limit switches per side When fully open , or fully closed a small round "push button" is depressed thereby opening the circuit to your motor and stopping it

Under driver's side fender are 4 relays. 2 for the right,2 for the left.


If one side is working and not the other sounds like you are getting power TO the relays.
If your motor works on the bench test, see if you have power  to and from the limit switches.

Search around on the site ,I think somebody downloaded the 67 hideaway headlight wiring schematic/instructions.
Mines in my build book, and a buddy has it.

If you run in to a dead-end , reply, and I'll  scan and post it---steve
320  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Early 1968 Z/28 original tires? on: June 01, 2014, 09:27:21 PM
That's a good question. In the 67 Z road test article, the test car had white stripes.
321  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Replace bearing races supplied with new rotors ??? on: June 01, 2014, 09:15:25 PM
Piece of mind is a wonderful thing Wink
322  Model Specific Discussions / Trans-Am Camaros / Re: 1968 Z road test on: June 01, 2014, 08:34:59 PM
Left hand on the steering wheel, camera in the right. That shot caught my eyes years ago.
323  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Maintenance / Re: Benchtest - 67 RS headlight motor on: June 01, 2014, 07:25:37 PM
1 lead from the motor to pos.        ( 12v supply, battery)
1 lead from motor to neg.

Should run continuous, either way. If it does not, motor is bad.

If ok, gets a little more confusing: limit switches, relays.  But not too confusing!  Can walk you through---steve
324  Model Specific Discussions / Trans-Am Camaros / Re: 1968 Z road test on: June 01, 2014, 12:16:33 PM
Thought about it after the post but I agree  Cheesy Sometimes I forget they had to keep the tests apples to apples---as It rolled off the line. Exhaust manifolds and small exhaust would choke any engine built to breathe. Jerry M's runs high 12's with headers (through full exhaust) ,4:88's and E 70's. My Dad ran 13.05's with the similar set up--poor traction. L60's did not help, and I don't know if they sprayed the tracks back then(in the 70's) When it did hook up,(small slicks) violent wheel hop without traction aid. All ET killers.

325  Model Specific Discussions / Trans-Am Camaros / Re: 1968 Z road test on: June 01, 2014, 10:19:20 AM
Really don't believe it was a priority back then , performance data #1. There were some details that did come up ( and matched what was done on mine ) so I'm pleased. Also matches 67 article/pics. Bit of time was put into "imperfection"  in small areas and Bob nailed it.  Lots of work  on my plate this summer, no way I'll be able to start re-assembly until fall/winter. Still 3 years ahead of my initial time set to "dig into it"

Interesting on their choice of rear gear, I believe in an article I read, Mr Stahl stated optimum would be 4:30  ,street/strip. A steeper 1st would be a must with 3:73's.A high 14/ low 15 sec Z just doesn't flow good off the tongue.




I always did, and still have a preference for 67's....love vent windows.


Any 69 Z road test articles out there ? Complete the trifecta. (spelling ?)
326  Model Specific Discussions / Trans-Am Camaros / Re: 1968 Z road test on: June 01, 2014, 08:42:47 AM
After reading John's post on the 67  Z road test ,it reminded me about the mag I've had for years.
327  Model Specific Discussions / Trans-Am Camaros / Re: 1968 Z road test on: June 01, 2014, 08:32:19 AM
6 of 6
328  Model Specific Discussions / Trans-Am Camaros / Re: 1968 Z road test on: June 01, 2014, 08:31:15 AM
5 of 6
329  Model Specific Discussions / Trans-Am Camaros / Re: 1968 Z road test on: June 01, 2014, 08:30:28 AM
4 of 6
330  Model Specific Discussions / Trans-Am Camaros / Re: 1968 Z road test on: June 01, 2014, 08:29:48 AM
3 of 6
Pages: 1 ... 20 21 [22] 23 24 ... 60
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.492 seconds with 18 queries.