46
General Discussion / Re: 69 Z certified by Steve and Jerry
« on: July 19, 2017, 09:20:38 PM »
Very nice car if all is legit. Love the survivor cars!
News:
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Classified ads are not allowed on the forum.
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
47
General Discussion / Re: Camaro Addiction
« on: July 19, 2017, 09:14:26 PM »
Great stuff and great people here at the CRG. Very addictive!
48
General Discussion / Re: Interesting 68 on ebay
« on: July 16, 2017, 03:34:50 AM »
Great looking car!
49
General Discussion / Ebay 69Z beware
« on: July 09, 2017, 02:58:29 PM »
When I first looked at the photos in the eBay ad I was skeptical. Then I read about it over on Yenko.net.
VIN: 124379N703347
http://www.yenko.net/forum/showthread.php?t=143546
http://www.ebay.com/itm/1969-Chevrolet-Camaro-Z28-RS-/252924066998?hash=item3ae372fcb6:g:BWoAAOSwblZZDoyu&vxp=mtr
VIN: 124379N703347
http://www.yenko.net/forum/showthread.php?t=143546
http://www.ebay.com/itm/1969-Chevrolet-Camaro-Z28-RS-/252924066998?hash=item3ae372fcb6:g:BWoAAOSwblZZDoyu&vxp=mtr
50
General Discussion / Re: 1969 Tuxedo Black Z w/Red Deluxe interior
« on: July 02, 2017, 08:34:54 PM »
Would love to see pictures and more info/history of your 69Z if you can. Very partial to that color combo myself. I have a 1966 Chevelle SS that I am restoring at this time with that factory color combo.
52
General Discussion / Re: Here we go again! 68 Z/28 buyer beware
« on: June 04, 2017, 10:49:33 PM »
It very well could be a real Z/28. Its the fact that the engine was acknowledged in 2012 as having been "re-stamped" but is now being advertised as "Real deal, original engine" and absolutely no mention at all of the decking and re-stamping in the current ad that bothers me. Maybe the current owner honestly doesn't know and thinks it is as described. Maybe he got screwed... Its just another perfect example of how these re-stamps show up months or years later as legit.
With this engine being decked and restamped there is no way anyone will ever know if that is the "Real deal, original engine" or not.
And the asking price is almost double of the 2012 price. If someone doesn't do there due diligence and search the VIN, they will get stung!
With this engine being decked and restamped there is no way anyone will ever know if that is the "Real deal, original engine" or not.
And the asking price is almost double of the 2012 price. If someone doesn't do there due diligence and search the VIN, they will get stung!
53
General Discussion / Here we go again! 68 Z/28 buyer beware
« on: June 04, 2017, 05:18:24 AM »
Nice job, Tony over on TC for busting this one.
Another example of a restamp showing up later on as the "real deal".
http://www.camaros.net/forums/66-whats-worth/431906-68-rs-z-interesting-history.html
http://www.ebay.com/itm/222532153019?rmvSB=true
http://www.usedcarsfsbo.com/asp/Item.asp?soldid=111454&make=chevrolet&theday=10/12/2012
VIN 124378N482269
Another example of a restamp showing up later on as the "real deal".
http://www.camaros.net/forums/66-whats-worth/431906-68-rs-z-interesting-history.html
http://www.ebay.com/itm/222532153019?rmvSB=true
http://www.usedcarsfsbo.com/asp/Item.asp?soldid=111454&make=chevrolet&theday=10/12/2012
VIN 124378N482269
55
Originality / Re: 1969 Camaro Fan/clutch bolts ?
« on: May 31, 2017, 06:17:58 AM »
Actually about 7/8" of thread, total bolt length is right at 1 1/8"
56
Originality / Re: 1969 Camaro Fan/clutch bolts ?
« on: May 30, 2017, 11:56:05 PM »
Austin, are these the bolts you are referring to? Although I can't be 100% positive that they are the original factory correct bolts I feel pretty confident that they are. I removed my water pump and fan clutch because they had been replaced many years ago but the deep grove pulley and 772 fan were still there. I just soaked these in evaporust for a couple of days. Hope this helps.
57
General Discussion / Re: '68 RS - Has been sitting in a barn since 1988.
« on: May 15, 2017, 12:03:48 PM »
A similar thread is running over on TC too. One member has reported it to ebay.
http://www.camaros.net/forums/66-whats-worth/430154-68-rs-z-how-bout-engine-stamp.html
http://www.camaros.net/forums/66-whats-worth/430154-68-rs-z-how-bout-engine-stamp.html
58
General Discussion / Re: '68 RS - Has been sitting in a barn since 1988.
« on: May 14, 2017, 09:03:03 PM »
Great job, Ed!!
59
General Discussion / Re: BJ 69Z now on ebay
« on: May 14, 2017, 01:00:17 AM »
For that kind of money he must be a BIG Tennessee fan. 
60
General Discussion / Re: BJ 69Z now on ebay
« on: May 13, 2017, 04:29:32 PM »
Yep, I just looked and you are right, Austin. For some reason I missed that thread.
I just remember being shocked when I saw it bring that huge money at BJ back in 2014, especially for it being a non original drivetrain car. With the sell price at $143,000. plus buyers fees the new owner must have over $150,000. in it.
http://www.camaros.org/forum/index.php?topic=14354.0
I just remember being shocked when I saw it bring that huge money at BJ back in 2014, especially for it being a non original drivetrain car. With the sell price at $143,000. plus buyers fees the new owner must have over $150,000. in it.
http://www.camaros.org/forum/index.php?topic=14354.0