616
General Discussion / Re: Little Pissed of the Coverage on Barrett Jackson
« on: January 19, 2014, 04:12:17 AM »
It was white and the first production 001 Z, don't know if Jay drove it or not. BJ web site I'd guess?
News:
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Classified ads are not allowed on the forum.
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
617
General Discussion / Re: Little Pissed of the Coverage on Barrett Jackson
« on: January 19, 2014, 03:51:02 AM »
They showed the 2014 Z 28 get sold but only because it was for charity sold to Rick Hendrick for 650k. Hammer price.
618
General Discussion / Re: Little Pissed of the Coverage on Barrett Jackson
« on: January 19, 2014, 01:36:27 AM »
1953 Corvette unrestored sold at BJ for 250,00k don't know if it was Chips.
619
General Discussion / Re: Little Pissed of the Coverage on Barrett Jackson
« on: January 18, 2014, 10:54:03 PM »
It sold for $ 253,000.
620
General Discussion / Re: So you think you have a Dana, Nickey,Berger Baldwin, etc...?
« on: January 18, 2014, 04:19:46 PM »
Here is paper work from the Oregon DMV transfering a 69 camaro from one dealer to the other for a customer.
621
General Discussion / Re: So you think you have a Dana, Nickey,Berger Baldwin, etc...?
« on: January 18, 2014, 03:51:35 PM »
John Z do you know of any state that allows us to do a title search on our 1st gen camaro's?
622
General Discussion / Re: So you think you have a Dana, Nickey,Berger Baldwin, etc...?
« on: January 17, 2014, 05:27:03 AM »
Guys woun't your money be better spent on having say... Jerry MacNeish come out and certify your car, as to what it is or is not? I know he can't supply you with photo's taken back in the day, or the POP. I can understand we all want original paper work on our cars, but it's 40 plus years later. People pass on, paper work gets thrown away.
623
General Discussion / Re: So you think you have a Dana, Nickey,Berger Baldwin, etc...?
« on: January 17, 2014, 12:53:27 AM »
Ok so NCRS can give up dealer information. How might this give you guys any more then when, where and who, on your cars? Lots of the dealers have closed or records are long gone after 40 years. And most State DMV's woun't give out information without a court order. Am I missing something here?
624
Originality / Re: factory 302 emblem on 1969 Z-28
« on: January 15, 2014, 08:30:49 PM »
Thanks Darrell. 
625
Originality / Re: factory 302 emblem on 1969 Z-28
« on: January 15, 2014, 01:24:29 AM »
So all factory ZL2 hoods on Z's should have the 302 emblems?
626
Originality / factory 302 emblem on 1969 Z-28
« on: January 15, 2014, 12:38:34 AM »
Are the 302 emblems on the 1969 Z 28 ZL2 hood, factory original or put on later at some time.
627
General Discussion / Re: Silver Z pictures from 1971 with second owner
« on: January 13, 2014, 10:04:18 PM »
Here are a few old original pictures from 1969 L 78 a car I owned. It's a southern Oregon car not far from Roseburg, Oregon. So it may have tangled with the blue 69 Z on Ebay from Roseburg.
628
General Discussion / Re: Silver Z pictures from 1971 with second owner
« on: January 13, 2014, 07:40:17 PM »
Chick did the original owner work for GM ? Engineer maybe ?
629
General Discussion / Re: Yahoo article about a Camaro ZL1 totaled
« on: January 12, 2014, 05:06:42 AM »630
General Discussion / Re: Yahoo article about a Camaro ZL1 totaled
« on: January 11, 2014, 04:20:24 PM »
How about the other customer who took his Camaro SS into a dealership and two employees were doing burn outs until they fried the clutch, and conspired to blame the customer.It's in the Hooper story... under mechanics doing burn outs in blue.