CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
October 24, 2014, 09:53:26 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
105759 Posts in 12346 Topics by 4757 Members
Latest Member: chelltab
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 [2]
16  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 1967 Camaro L30/M20 on: November 29, 2012, 01:58:35 AM
That's very interesting, thanks. So Fisher Body installs the plate, but the assembly line never actually installs the bar..Very odd, but I guess thats the way this car is. I suppose they installed the plate and if, after the car is in service and there becomes a complaint of wheelhop, the dealer could easily install the bar. Thanks for all your replies
17  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / 1967 Camaro L30/M20 on: November 28, 2012, 11:01:49 AM
I recently bought a 67 L30/M20 Camaro. It doesn't have it's original engine or trans, but from what I can tell the rear is the original. It's a LOS car built 01D and has the 10 bolt posi in it. Code PE. I'm pretty sure it's the original rear. The car does have the traction bar support plate under the RH side of the rear seat. However, there is no bracket welded to the RH axle tube, never appears to have been one and there is no well-nut in the RH rear frame rail to secure the traction bar. I thought this strange.
Pages: 1 [2]
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.072 seconds with 18 queries.