Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - 68SixBangerRS

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 17
16
This is the 230's manifold.  The number two and three cylinder's use a siamesed exhaust port, and I'm sure you can see the pock-marked surface.  In the second photo you can see the less-damaged siamesed port for cylinders four and five.

17
Taking off the 230's manifold revealed a couple of issues.  First issue was that the number 2 and 5 cylinder exhaust surfaces on the manifold were heavily pock-marked, indicating that those two areas had been leaking for quite awhile.  Since the engine has only 40k miles, I'm guessing the Flint factory's sealing job was marginal from the very start and that it probably began leaking shortly after the car was purchased. 

The second issue was that the manifold's number two exhaust port had a small but clearly visible crack that was allowing smoke to exit (I tried to get a picture of the crack, but my digital camera's resolution and flash weren't up to the task). 

Hmmm...what to do.  One of the best things about driving 1,600 miles round-trip to Austin, MN to buy the 40k mile 230 engine from a little-old-lady '70 Nova was that I had essentially an identical twin to my '69 Camaro's original 250.  Aside from the obvious cubic-inch difference, the only real differences between the two engines are that the '69 head employed an AIR pump (its head has ports for the air pump's tubes that the '70's head lacks), and the '70 used a carburetor stove for the air cleaner's Therm Vac setup.  I pulled the '69's manifold and it was smooth and clean...no issues.  To make David K happy (  8) ) I separated the manifold (for the uninitiated, the "6-banger's" manifold has an intake half and an exhaust half that are joined by a square gasket) and replaced the gasket that joins the halves.

Ok...now the beautifully-running 230 from the little-old-lady '70 Nova has the manifold from the sick, vibrating 250 from the 46k mile '69 Camaro (just wanted to fully explain this little hybrid arrangement for anyone who came into the story late).

How does she run?...PERFECTLY!!!  ;)

18
David...absolutely will.

19
A couple more pics of Charlotte because I know you appreciate what a little beauty she is.  :)

20
The points looked like new...no appreciable wear or burn spots.  The manifold gasket still had factory orange paint on it (the original).  Once the manifold was removed the source of the leak  was obvious...the gasket was compromised in two places (see first photo).  Our weather changed from 67 deg and sunshine at noon to 50 deg with rain and high winds at 2pm, so the replacement project will have to wait until tomorrow.

21
David...you are correct, Sir...the heat shield is from a 1970.  I swapped in the 230 "as-is"...in its original 1970 configuration.  It has an obnoxious exhaust leak which has prompted me to replace the manifold gasket (progressing nicely...should be done by this evening).  The leak didn't prevent me from taking Charlotte out and driving her for a shakedown run of 50 hiway miles.  The 230 stumbled some from idle up to middle RPMs, which I believe may be due to the leak.  The original Monojet carb from the 250 is going on the 230, and I am removing the non-1969 items like the CCS solenoid and the anti-dieseling solenoid, but I am considering keeping the heat shield as I think it's a good idea and may improve the car's drivability in summer conditions.

Thanks to all for your kind words.  I think Charlotte is going to attract a great deal of attention due to her now unusual drivetrain.  I am glad she is appreciated on here for her originality. 

22
I am happy to report the engine swap was a complete success.  The 230 produces excellent power and easily keeps up with modern traffic.  I can't really tell much difference between the 230 and a 250...the best way to drive it is to give it plenty of pedal off the line and shift to 2nd at 20-25 mph, then shift to 3rd at 40-45.  It cruises easily at 75, but it seems happier at 65-70.  Most drivers follow behind at a close distance to watch it glide down the hiway.  It produces many smiles and thumbs up...I like it a lot.  :)

23
A close-up of the carb's heat shield.

24
Dropping the 230 in was easy...it slid right in.

25
The fan was cleaned with polishing compound and Turtle Wax. 

26
Since the '70 engine has a good carb stove, I decided to use its beautiful air cleaner.  The paint is nearly perfect and it really shines.  Note the date code in green paint which shows it was assembled on the 122nd day of 1970.

27
The engine is completely original, including its starter.  It is a 40k mile engine...an incredible rarity these days.  The starter cleaned up beautifully.  Its date indicates it was assembled on May 5th, 1970.

28
The "new" 230 engine is completely original.  The engine's stamp indicates it was assembled on May 15th, 1970 at the Flint, MI plant.  It also has a partial VIN...something that was not always done on 6-cylinder engines that I have seen (and owned).

29
David and MO, it is nice to hear from you both.  I'm looking forward to meeting some of you guys one of these days.  My intention is to take Charlotte to the Camaro Supernats in the Detroit area this July, so perhaps I'll see you there.

David, I see you have a 6-banger '68, and it appears you have in-depth knowledge of 1st Gen sixes as you know about the air pump holes in the cylinder head and that the pump bracket is correct (only the manual trans-equipped sixes got the smog pumps).  Not many Camaro guys know about what is and isn't correct for a 6-banger, as most junked the original engines for V8s.  I'm impressed.

When the original 250 has been rebuilt, it will go back in along with the smog pump and air tubes (you can see my post about the air pump earlier in this thread).

30
A few detail shots of the engine compartment.  Note the small green tag on the engine's wire harness (visible to the right of the master brake cylinder).

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 17
anything