Messages

1

Decoding/Numbers / Re: Original 467 distributor

« on: November 04, 2024, 03:59:54 PM »

Restamped, no doubt. Too many flaws and missed details.

Steve

2

Decoding/Numbers / Re: 1968 MO 302 stamp — Legit?

« on: September 16, 2024, 01:10:56 AM »

General characters and font are not outside the realm of possibility. Judge the build date against the casting date and the assembly week and see how it falls. Assuming the casting number is correct as well ? If everything matches, I wouldn’t count it out -

Regards,
Steve

3

Originality / Re: wiper blades for '69 Z28

« on: August 29, 2024, 04:22:44 AM »

My X77 had Anco Red Dot Anti Wind Lifts on it when I bought it in 1973, my Z11 had them on it when I bought it in ‘94, the ‘68 Z had them on it when bought in ‘94. The X77’s wipers had been on there for at least a few years prior, judging by the patina, ditto on the other 2. Matte finish, all three. My ‘67 had them on it, only in bright finish. I’ve voiced my opinions on this before, participated in several threads on the subject, and asked the opinion of a guy that knows a whole bunch more about Chevrolets than I will in my lifetime. His opinion matched what I always thought about originality. I’ve heard a lot of comments on both sides of the fence - my ultimate decision is to leave them on the car(s) as they are. Plus, you can find both Trico and Anco references in the parts books. I like the cosmetics -

Unfortunately, I couldn’t make it a clean sweep as the X66 only had one wiper arm on it with no blade. A pretty high percentage of coincidence, you have to admit -

Regards,
Steve

4

Originality / Re: 68z valve covers (The O)

« on: August 29, 2024, 02:38:51 AM »

Had mine rechromed years ago, fortunately the plater heeded my warning about removing the “0”, but it’s still a little lighter than the finish with the OE chrome over nickel.

I do think it’s peculiar to the HP engines, my ‘67 script Chevy ll L79 covers are supposed to carry the “0” as well. I assume the ‘67 Z (same covers) would be the same -

Regards,
Steve

5

General Discussion / Re: Engine stamp

« on: August 29, 2024, 01:56:52 AM »

Ditto. There are a couple of tells on this one - the partial VIN looks decent, but the build date/code stamp is definitely bogus.

Steve

6

General Discussion / Re: 69 AC Remanufacrured compressor

« on: August 17, 2024, 03:15:55 AM »

It’s not just the O rings you have to worry about - the spag oil used with R134 will eventually erode the R12 hoses as well as the O rings (new compatible rings are Viton if I remember correctly). Also, R133 systems do not use the POA valve (at least in R12 form), most air conversions recommend gutting the old valve and keeping the shell for original cosmetics.

I guess at some point (when I run out of R12 access), I’ll have to convert my Z11 to R134. Last pricing I saw for a 30lb can was more than I paid for my X77 in ‘73 - no exaggeration.

Regards,
Steve

7

General Discussion / Re: 69 AC Remanufacrured compressor

« on: August 15, 2024, 04:06:58 PM »

Totally depends on how you’re going to configure the system - the compressor will run with either depending on which you are setting up for, just make sure the compressor is internally clean(with no residual oils from the opposite Freon from you are converting). Same goes for the rest of the components. A good friend of mine converted his A6 compressor on his ‘69 Firechicken 6-7 years ago to 134, has maybe 20K miles on it and works great.

How the system is going to do when 134 goes away is another good question -

Regards,
Steve

8

General Discussion / Re: Question for Dave69x33

« on: June 19, 2024, 02:58:08 PM »

Out of curiosity, did you get an answer ? Sending a PM might get you a response.


https://classiccars.com/listings/view/1427454/1969-chevrolet-camaro-z28-for-sale-in-springfield-ohio-45503

This the car (according to the VIN, yes) ? I noted the dealer indicated “proper DZ stamping”. A pretty LeMans car nonetheless -

Regards,
Steve

9

General Discussion / Re: Making rubber parts pliable again.

« on: November 22, 2023, 01:22:38 PM »

It used to be Armor All "Detailer's Advantage", spray bottle, my supply has lasted for years (so I haven't bought any in a long while). I've also used regular Armor All for the same purposes before. I was hesitant to use it on my top at first, installer recommended to apply to a soft cloth first and then lightly apply it to the top, I was satisfied with the result from the first use. Using it ever since -

Steve

10

Research Topics & Reports / Re: Original cowl hood photos needed

« on: November 22, 2023, 02:38:24 AM »

Bryon,

I've got 4, 2 NOS and 2 earlier used (which unfortunately have insulation attached, one on the Pace Car and one on my '68 Z). the NOS ones are still in the boxes, dated April '92 if they will be of any benefit. I also have 2 early SS hoods w/o insulation if they are needed. I'll be glad to take pics if they can help -

Regards,
Steve

11

General Discussion / Re: Making rubber parts pliable again.

« on: November 22, 2023, 02:20:25 AM »

You'd be surprised how a good soaking with clear Armor All will do - I've used is on everything from hoses to wiper blades, also even helps painted parts survive to bend another day. My convertible top installer had me put a coat on my Z11's top to protect it, still looks great after 25 years. I periodically use it on my air hoses and various electrical cords in the shop. Good stuff -

Regards,
Steve

12

Decoding/Numbers / Re: 1969 Z28 rear panel emblem

« on: September 28, 2023, 01:54:30 AM »

Forgot to add the front view -

13

Decoding/Numbers / Re: 1969 Z28 rear panel emblem

« on: September 28, 2023, 01:39:16 AM »

My tail emblem, on the car in '73 when I bought it, "28" is silver, see pics for markings. Known the car since '72 when I first worked on it, long before Trim Parts reproduced the emblems. I have no doubt the emblem is original to the car, which is a documented car. Emblem removed and stored since '81.

Regards,
Steve

14

General Discussion / Re: Where Do I Start to Authenticate My New 68 SS?

« on: September 28, 2023, 01:10:28 AM »

I'll add a little clue list to look for - check out the engine frame mounts for appearance and part number(s), which are stamped on the top edge of the plate where it faces up towards the fenders. If they are correct, and not brand new in appearance or relatively newer in appearance to the subframe, that might give you some hope for original BB options. Check the condition of the trans tunnel where the 4 speed shifter would have mounted. Fuel line mounting and diameter over the subframe in the area of the upper A-arm ? Disc brake car ? Console ?  These are clues, not determining factors by any means, but will help understand how the car may have been optioned when it left the factory.

In any event, it's a pretty car, and I join the statement that you can be proud of it and enjoy showing it regardless of the authenticity/pedigree. I'm fortunate to be a '68 owner with documentation, but i understand your want to verify what you own.

Regards,
Steve

15

Decoding/Numbers / Re: Caveat Emptor...another repro body tag?

« on: August 25, 2023, 06:23:20 PM »

I think beating on it with a ball pein hammer helped the aged appearance of the tag quite a bit - but I’m no expert.

Steve