Messages

181

Originality / Re: Shock Absorber Codes

« on: August 22, 2018, 01:26:53 AM »

Ed, your broadcast sheet shows two boxes for front springs, but one box for shocks. The rear shows one box for springs and two boxes for shocks. Makes no sense to me.

Do you think we are reading too deeply into this and maybe the person that drafted the blank broadcast sheet didn't fully understand how vehicles are built?

                                                          - Warren

182

Originality / Re: Shock Absorber Codes

« on: August 21, 2018, 10:20:26 PM »

Ed, I think you meant to say box 245 and 247 for the rear shock.

                                                                    - Warren

183

1969 - Orphans / Re: JH engine 19N680592

« on: August 19, 2018, 05:21:36 PM »

So what do we have to do, verify every single ad with a certification? Really did not want to post the Yenko.net ad, but you wanted a source. Wasn't trying to help the guy sell it, was just hoping someone with that VIN would show up and they could determine if it is something they can use.

                                                        - Warren

184

1969 - Orphans / Re: JH engine 19N680592

« on: August 19, 2018, 03:11:47 PM »

Is this better?

https://www.yenko.net/forum/showthread.php?t=150369

185

1969 - Orphans / JH engine 19N680592

« on: August 19, 2018, 02:53:10 AM »

1969 Camaro 396/375 engine pad stamped T0725JH, filter pad stamp 9N680592

Possible VIN 124379N680592 or 124679N680592

Location, Ohio

Seller Dennis Vugrinovich

Phone 330-770-2517

186

General Discussion / Re: New to these forums

« on: August 15, 2018, 03:37:06 AM »

Welcome!

I believe all you will need to know, will come from the CRG site.

Plenty of knowledgeable members here, so ask away.

                                                                            - Warren

187

General Discussion / Re: 1967 rear spoiler question

« on: August 08, 2018, 10:22:45 PM »

Restored cars that have no antenna means it has received replacement Sheetmetal, for new metal does not have a hole for the antenna because they do not know which it is to be and leaves it to the bodyshop to cut a hole where it needs to be.
[/quote]

Maybe a restored car that has no antenna holes could mean it originally was a radio delete car.

                                                                    - Warren

188

Originality / Re: Multi-Leaf Rear, E-Brake Cable Brackets

« on: August 08, 2018, 02:43:58 AM »

Post away....Warren

189

Originality / Re: Multi-Leaf Rear, E-Brake Cable Brackets

« on: August 07, 2018, 09:51:23 PM »

Tim,

The part number 3895206 R.H. bracket is riveted to the perch plate as is 3895205 L.H.. Those brackets are used on mono leaf Camaro's. I believe '67 uses both, '69 would use the 3895206 R.H. on mono leaf cars.

Bracket 3923533 is used on both sides muliti leaf and also the drivers side mono leaf '69 Camaro. JL8 uses one on the pass side.

You said you think there is a W stamped on bracket. You are close, it is actually MC. It can be found at the curve where it wraps around the cable.

I am sending you some pictures to your email address since I do not know how to post on this site.

                                                                         - Warren

190

Research Topics & Reports / Re: Original Starters - 67 L6, 68 SS350, and 69 SS350 autos

« on: August 01, 2018, 08:46:59 PM »

Your Starters:

67 L6
1108366

68 and 69 SS350
1108400 ST
1108429 AT

If you took this info out of a book, that is not what KurtS is looking for. The info needs to be gained by looking at original cars and their build dates.

                                                         - Warren

191

Originality / Re: Does this EBAY BE rear end look legit?

« on: July 26, 2018, 09:59:38 PM »

I believe this seller has been discussed at great lengths at this link and starts about halfway down the page.

https://www.yenko.net/forum/showthread.php?t=140881&page=2

                                                                    - Warren

192

Originality / Re: 1969 turn signal lamps

« on: July 24, 2018, 12:58:33 AM »

All front turn signals or parking lamps assemblies were the same through out the year. The only exception is the early lens with the trim ring and painted gray outside surface that goes around the lens.

A picture of what you are describing would be helpful.
                                       
                                                                       - Warren

Don't forget the Light monitor versions were part numbered differently, the housing and pigtail were different than ??% of the std assemblies.

Good point as I forgot about them.

                                                         - Warren

193

1969 - Orphans / Re: Transmission case Muncie 4 speed 19N554819

« on: July 24, 2018, 12:44:59 AM »

Now on eBay......

https://www.ebay.com/itm/Muncie-4-Speed-Transmission-Main-Case-3925660-Corvette-Camaro-Chevelle-P9S30A/113163126998?hash=item1a590c48d6:g:RbYAAOSwiq9bVPBh&vxp=mtr

Stamped 19N554819      Possible VIN 124379N554819 or 124679N554819

Dated P9S30A

Seller lbnaz

Location Tucson, Arizona

194

Originality / Re: 1969 turn signal lamps

« on: July 23, 2018, 09:29:54 PM »

All front turn signals or parking lamps assemblies were the same through out the year. The only exception is the early lens with the trim ring and painted gray outside surface that goes around the lens.

A picture of what you are describing would be helpful.
                                       
                                                                       - Warren

195

1968 - Orphans / 18N461292 Muncie Case on eBay

« on: July 20, 2018, 03:24:09 AM »

M20 or M21 Muncie case on eBay

VIN 124378N461292 or 124678N461292

Case stamped 18N461292

Dated P8E16

Seller  bigblockho

Located Wilmington, North Carolina

https://www.ebay.com/itm/Muncie-Trans-660-Maim-Case/223066849427?hash=item33efd20093:g:oUwAAOSwaENbT7CL&vxp=mtr