CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
July 24, 2014, 05:41:40 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
102311 Posts in 12074 Topics by 4661 Members
Latest Member: 23bull
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6
61  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / 1969 Z/28 questions on: May 04, 2013, 03:03:22 PM
    Hello ,  I have a  question ,  How much does it hurt the value of a car not the original color? The color is supposed to be Daytona Yellow..  What is  everyone using for body  and A-arm bushings? Poly or Rubber? Also are the original fuel and brake lines being used ? Clean and clear them or just replace with all stainless lines? I want to get started on this project .I would like to get the bushings and or lines before tear down... 

    My car is a VanNuys built Z/28 Born with Engine,Trans and Rearend BV code ... Standard interior, console, gauges, AM-FM Blue dot Thanks Rob
62  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 1969 am/fm blue light radio questions on: April 05, 2013, 12:57:37 AM
 Hi ,thanks for your help the multiplex is above the glove box so I guess its the u79 option....
63  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / 1969 am/fm blue light radio questions on: March 28, 2013, 11:21:02 PM
  Hi ,I have an am/fm blue light radio ,also has speakers in the kick panels .. My question is....Is there another control box used with this?  What and where is it mounted? Should it have 2 rear speakers or 1? the car is an 03D build Vannuys car.. Thanks
64  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 69 Z/28 Question on: March 04, 2013, 12:32:26 AM
 Hi thanks a lot as soon as it warms up a little ...I will get those numbers...
65  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / 69 Z/28 Question on: March 03, 2013, 11:32:00 PM
   Hi, all I have a question ... I have a complete 302 from air cleaner to starter the build date on the front pad of the engine is VoI30DZ ......So what month of car would it most likely be for? Or does it matter at this point and stick it in any Z/28 ... Because I want a nice car  that you can drive and not just look pretty and polish .... It does have the vin stamped into the rough cast on the side... just haven't put it on the engine stand to  get the numbers ...Thanks Rob
66  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Poll #3 - CRG T-shirt color on: March 02, 2013, 04:48:39 PM
   I was curious why ash/grey shirts weren't included ?
67  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / How rare??? on: March 02, 2013, 04:40:44 PM
  How rare is a 69 Z/28 painted 63 63 Huh?
68  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / 69 vn z/28 on: February 18, 2013, 12:29:51 AM
 Hi ,How can you tell on a VN car if it is a Z/28 by the trim tag?
69  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Ebay trim tag on: June 20, 2012, 08:05:39 PM
I found another Camaro Trim tag on Ebay Item #261046419045 ,still don't know how to link to it anyways its an X33 with no paint code dash-dash .
 Seems funny the guy has blank tags for sale aswell.... So you decide original or made up....
70  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Fold Down Rear Seat on: June 11, 2012, 01:49:44 PM
Is thefold down rear seat one of the rarer options for the 69? A buddy has a 69 Z/28 RS hugger orange , White vinyl top deluxe white houndstooth interior ,fold down rear seat  ....
71  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Body build date VS Body number on: June 07, 2012, 07:02:45 AM
 Paul , I read the link you posted and I understand that the next car in sequence may have not built at the same plant....  For example if we use the tag that's posted on that link 03D NOR 295460 Then if you found a car 03D NOR 338975 then wouldn't that look suspicious ? Then if you had a known tag  say 07A NOR 338952 Then you would tend to think that the car you found was a fraud... Does this make sense?  Thanks Rob
72  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Original Drivetrains on: June 06, 2012, 02:53:30 PM
Well I know of at least 3 that dont have their motors 2 cars ,That I know of and I have an original 69 DZ 302 from air cleaner to starter. The number s are on the bell housing flange but cant make them out  ...Deck stamp is V0130DZ
73  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Body build date VS Body number on: June 06, 2012, 02:49:22 PM
I know that was the date that the car was started ,but I am reffering to the build start date verses the body number on the trim tag ...Because if you had alot of ( Real )cars from say Norwood then you could develope a base like the Vin base . So for instance if you found a car that looked suspicous then you could cross check the body number with known cars from that build date and see if it fits ... Does this make sense?
74  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Body build date VS Body number on: June 06, 2012, 12:00:51 PM
 Hi searched to see if there is any parameters for this date say 02A date and body NORxxxxxx ?  I know there is a chart for Vins in Jerry's awesome book ..  Possibly could make a data base for this info?
75  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / 1969 console gauges / clock and more Questions on: May 28, 2012, 02:49:50 PM
Ok so what I have found says you recieved the clock in the dash as part of the console gauge package correct u17 ? Also how much time from assembly date on the engine to build date of the car? (The only real way to tell is by vin on the bell housing flange) lastly for a Z/28 to be a RS as well could only be an X33? Thanks Rob
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.096 seconds with 18 queries.