CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 29, 2015, 05:31:02 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
111378 Posts in 12825 Topics by 4913 Members
Latest Member: devodave
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 40
46  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 1969 Build sheet info on: January 29, 2015, 05:15:53 AM
There was a large amount of decoding info available via the link that Ed posted HERE, but it appears the hosting site has ceased operation since late 2014. I know I saved copies of the documents that were hosted there, just have to find them; will send them to you when I do.
Note Kurt's comment in that thread, that there are some errors in the decoding and some of the codes are missing. It's a good start though.
47  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 1969 Camaro Heater Control Back Light - Green or White? on: January 28, 2015, 03:33:08 AM
Sounds like it could be a hard piece to find. Maybe an easier solution to get the correct illumination again is to buy a green LED replacement bulb from https://www.superbrightleds.com
I believe the original heater control bulb was number 1895, should be able to find an equivalent cross-match with the right bayonet style in green.
48  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Is there a difference between a factory posi and dealer installed posi for 1969? on: January 28, 2015, 03:13:51 AM
Posi manufacturer codes (per CRG Drivetrain section) were:
D = Dana
E = Eaton
W = Warner

What's the casting number and date of the rear center? 'PG' was used as a rear axle code in all 3 years, open in 69 but posi in both 67 (10 bolt) and 68 (12 bolt). Could be from an earlier model?
49  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Part Number Stamp or Sticker on Wiper Motor Assy on: January 26, 2015, 05:17:54 AM
Kurt, thank you for uploading the spreadsheet; I will do my best to update it whenever I can (subject to new data points provided by members here). I guess a screenshot would allow others to see the data easily, so I can do that too. Obviously anyone else who wants to help can do updates too.

Perhaps to refresh the original question, maybe we could try and home in on further data points in the apparent gap in the (very limited) dates so far; it looks as though the stickers were introduced between 12B and some time around 02D. Maybe it's as simple as 01A, with a sticker Julian date code of '001'.
If anyone has an original wiper motor on a car assembled between 12B and 02D, that data would be very helpful!

As for the part number that Jim posted (5045608) I am kicking myself because I saw a car for sale on eBay that had the exact same number on it's wiper motor. I was in a hurry so I added the listing to my watched items for later, but somehow seem to have deleted it....... As far as I can recall, it wasn't a Chevrolet model, but a Pontiac - although of course it may not have been OE for that make or model.
50  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: very interesting picture on: January 25, 2015, 05:23:24 PM
The original owner of my car also had a 1970 Z28 that he used to flat tow the 69 to the track with. Car still has the home-made tow tabs on it. Probably far more common than we realise now, but would have loved to see a photo of that.......
51  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Part Number Stamp or Sticker on Wiper Motor Assy on: January 25, 2015, 12:42:44 AM
Not familiar with that Kurt but will check it out - thanks!
52  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Part Number Stamp or Sticker on Wiper Motor Assy on: January 24, 2015, 04:15:47 PM
^ Thanks to Steve and Gary for updating the table - I had the same issues previously, seemed to be trial and error as it often looked different between the editing screen (aligned well) and when posted (jumbled up).......
Darrell kindly put it into a spreadsheet, but unless the spreadsheet can be posted here, we'd have to rely on him, or someone with a copy, updating it and posting a screen grab of it.
I'll look into how to create tables in HTML code.
53  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Part Number Stamp or Sticker on Wiper Motor Assy on: January 21, 2015, 03:30:33 PM
Thanks Chick!
54  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Part Number Stamp or Sticker on Wiper Motor Assy on: January 21, 2015, 03:45:11 AM
My all-original 02D non-RS '69 has the mylar sticker with the part number, and the motor is stamped Delco Products.
John, looks like yours is stamped from Rochester NY, not Dayton OH; if you could confirm the assembly date code on the sticker, that'd be a solid data point, as your car is so original.
55  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Part Number Stamp or Sticker on Wiper Motor Assy on: January 21, 2015, 03:41:24 AM
you just looking for 69's ?
Yup, as far as I know, the 68's all used a stamped part number, 5045441 for non-RS (and I don't recall the RS version part number off the top of my head). Am not aware of a date code on them, although I have seen some ink-stamped numbers on certain motor casings; maybe the next member research effort?
56  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Part Number Stamp or Sticker on Wiper Motor Assy on: January 20, 2015, 06:40:28 AM
Been a while since I reviewed this thread, but was contacted by a member who suggested that maybe the changeover from stamped number to foil sticker is connected with the manufacturing plant that the wiper motor assemblies came from.
I hadn't spotted this before, but the motor casings appear to have 2 different stampings after the 'DELCO PRODUCTS':
Either 'DAYTON OHIO, USA' or 'ROCHESTER, N.Y. USA'
From the limited data points in the last updated table, it's impossible to identify when the stickers were actually introduced, but it would appear that there was a transition during the model year, possibly something like this:
Stamped P/N only (early)---------Stamped P/N and Sticker (mid)------------Sticker only (late)
Wonder if wiper motor production was switched from Dayton to Rochester during production, or if both manufactured motor assemblies throughout?
57  Orphans - documentation or VIN-stamped drivetrains - in search of the original cars / 1969 - Orphans / Re: 9N641593 M22 on: January 19, 2015, 03:22:55 AM
Ended Jan 18, 2015.
24 bids to US$1,226.00
No sale, Reserve Not Met.
58  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Best 302 Air Cleaner Decal on: January 15, 2015, 03:20:41 PM
Danny.. maybe Hearbeat City ?  I was just checking their decals out.  The 302/290 HP appears to be one of the better ones I've seen on the web.  Haven't seen it personally and I'm gonna need one also.  Maybe someone there would be kind enough to send a pic looking dead on from their phone instead of looking at the pic they advertise which is on on angle.
http://www.heartbeatcitycamaro.com/store/product/17026/Camaro-Air-cleaner-decal-302-290-hp-1967-1968-1969/
Doesn't appear to have 'PRINTED IN USA' on it though.
59  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Best 302 Air Cleaner Decal on: January 14, 2015, 05:12:34 AM
If they are not smart enough to post the picture of the actual item they are selling, well.. I sure am not going to be giving them any of my money. I'm dumb, but I isn't stupid.. D
You may be referring to what Gary posted, but if not, I didn't say the photo is not of the item, just that the decal looks better in front of you than the photo suggests.
60  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Best 302 Air Cleaner Decal on: January 14, 2015, 01:14:39 AM
I'll hunt down the decals I bought from Bowtie and post a picture, my recollection was that they are better than the photo indicates.
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 40
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.353 seconds with 18 queries.