CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 18, 2015, 08:17:48 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
112091 Posts in 12879 Topics by 4931 Members
Latest Member: Euclid
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 28 29 [30] 31 32 ... 42
436  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Original Hurst Shifter or Not on: October 20, 2013, 07:27:09 PM
I will have to go and check the numbers on my 04A car's shifter, I believe it starts with '39' but can't recall for sure.
Just checked shifter from my 04A car and it is 29D33D, so looks like both it and the 03D car (29D29C stamp) had February shifter bodies.
437  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Original Hurst Shifter or Not on: October 20, 2013, 10:53:33 AM
I have a shifter pulled from an 03D Los Angeles car on my desk right now, and it is stamped '29D29C' which would make it a February 1969 shifter body on a March-assembled car, if the above is correct.
I will have to go and check the numbers on my 04A car's shifter, I believe it starts with '39' but can't recall for sure.
438  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 1968 Camaro <wagon> - Oh the Indignity. on: October 12, 2013, 08:06:01 AM
Wonder how many people were interested until seller stated the trees weren't included in the deal.
439  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Mild Modifications / Re: Are 71 Cutlass front parking lights the same as 69 Camaro? on: October 09, 2013, 05:42:45 AM
They sure look similar, although as you say, the lens looks slightly different:
http://www.opgi.com/cutlass/C240932/
440  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 68 Z Paint Code on: October 08, 2013, 03:24:17 PM
441  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: What the heck is this? on: October 07, 2013, 03:29:57 PM
I have an idea they may have been fitted to big block cars..... Will have to go and check the AIM.
442  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 1969 Z/28 Power Brake Hose Bracket - Original? on: October 05, 2013, 05:22:21 PM
Nice comparison pics Lloyd.
443  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 69' Z28 with Factory Cross Ram on: October 05, 2013, 04:42:10 AM
Stripes would've been black if the car originally had a black vinyl roof, but the trim tag details indicate it was a 72 72 PNT car.......
444  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: wiper motor wiring on: October 03, 2013, 05:07:16 AM
This thread over at Team Camaro may help: http://www.camaros.net/forums/showthread.php?t=42420
445  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: ACC carpet texture ??? on: October 01, 2013, 04:19:20 PM
Well if it were mine, and regardless of the return period expiry, I would contact ACC customer service and email them these photos for an opinion. They *may* offer to help you out if that isn't within normal quality control standards (although someone should have checked it before it left the factory....)
446  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Sheetmetal Date Code on: October 01, 2013, 04:11:18 PM
Upside down H12 and right side up H17 on pass door.
Thanks for confirming. Interesting that your door has 2 stamps as well.....
I guess we're unlikely to ever find out why, unless someone who worked in one of the many stamping plants (and knows why it occurred) reads this.
447  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Sheetmetal Date Code on: September 30, 2013, 11:02:05 PM
Thanks for the photos janobyte. I may have missed something, but did you say that the 'H 12' and 'H 17' are both on the same door?
My drivers door, the only door I've checked, is  'H 37 -1'    which is within 1 or 2 weeks of the production week 09C.   How close are the doors on you fellas' cars to your production week??
Gary, the door in the photos at the start of this thread is from a parts car, but on my 04A car, almost all of the panels are stamped 'T 12'; so far I have found one 'H 7' and the latest is '13' (the flat hood) which is cutting things fine for an 04A build.....
448  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Part Number Stamp or Sticker on Wiper Motor Assy on: September 30, 2013, 06:55:08 AM
Got another one to add to the list, this (being dated '034') is the earliest yet:

Windshield Wiper Motor PNs and markings including dates.
build date  NOR/LOS    RS?    sticker PN?    Stamped PN?  Sticker codes       Notes


   12B         LOS           Y        No Sticker     5045605        No sticker      stamped on the side - 4918976  2)
    ??            ??            N        5045572           Y             034  9  B  E
   03D         NOR          Y        5045605            Y             079  9  B  F     Part # in yellow paint
   06A         NOR          N         5045572           Y            100  9  5  B
   06A         NOR          N        5045572            N            134  9  6  B
   09C         NOR          Y        5045605            N             227  9  6  A
    ??              ?           N        5045572            N             282  9  6  B
449  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Was the 293 B-R coil used in 67? on: September 30, 2013, 04:29:41 AM
I believe the standard coil for 1967 V8 models was 267; 293 was used in '68 and '69 V8 applications (unless you had something fancy like a ZL-2 hood).
450  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 1969 4 speed shifter console pate# on: September 29, 2013, 01:10:54 AM
Donny, the 69 AIM shows that plate as part # 3949537 (UPC D55, sheet A4). I believe 3921801 is the 1968 part number for the same item, so would have the simulated walnut woodgrain.
Pages: 1 ... 28 29 [30] 31 32 ... 42
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.408 seconds with 18 queries.