CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
November 27, 2014, 01:25:59 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
106632 Posts in 12432 Topics by 4790 Members
Latest Member: gmein
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 21 22 [23] 24 25 ... 33
331  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 69' Z28 on eBay in DB ? on: September 11, 2013, 04:12:10 PM
I agree the AIM is vague as to correct placement! I made sure to take many photos of the emblem position before removing it from the grille on my car.
332  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: original paint 69 Z on ebay... "survivor" on: September 10, 2013, 04:36:32 PM
Here are all the pics of my car http://s202.photobucket.com/albums/aa290/vannuysz28/ there are a lot of them.....
Was that once Van's car?
333  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Fisher Body manual for 1969 on: September 10, 2013, 04:33:29 PM
I've never come across an electronic version of it either, but I'm old school when it comes to books and prefer to be able to hold the book in my hands..... That said, the PDF version is handy for printing out just the bit you need for the task in hand, plus you can enlarge those small diagrams to properly see them!
334  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 69' Z28 on eBay in DB ? on: September 10, 2013, 04:11:02 AM
Funny how few of these cars have the grille emblem correctly positioned.....
335  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: how about this one on: September 10, 2013, 04:02:52 AM
Wheels painted body color  Huh
Relisted with start bid of $50k, B.I.N of $100k:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/281165679606
336  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: eBay 69' Z28 survivor on: September 09, 2013, 04:07:15 AM
That is a bargain, assuming all numbers checked out ok.....
337  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: AIM Station Datums on: September 07, 2013, 07:30:07 PM
John, great info (as always). Were any of those reference points physically transferred onto the car during assembly? Otherwise, how were emblems and other items positioned to the AIM dimensions by the line workers?
(I do understand that the AIM is an engineering document, and not all details were for the worker's use/benefit).
338  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Muncie Transmission ID on: September 07, 2013, 07:24:19 PM
Had a Chevelle with that tag #.
339  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: AIM Station Datums on: September 07, 2013, 12:22:16 AM
Thanks for the reply Mark, appreciate the info.
340  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: 1969 Amp gauge problem on: September 06, 2013, 08:01:58 PM
When you shut the engine off, does the ammeter go to zero? And then go to discharge (-ve) if you turn on the headlights?
341  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: 1969 Amp gauge problem on: September 06, 2013, 07:56:15 PM
I believe that means the alternator is undercharging. Does the needle rise to zero (or higher) if you increase the engine revs?
342  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / AIM Station Datums on: September 06, 2013, 05:46:21 PM
The AIM diagrams sometimes include measurements from reference stations. An example would be the placement of emblems on body panels, and includes both longitudinal and transverse dimension references. Unless I've missed it, I couldn't find in the AIM where the datum (starting) point for these stations is. Can anyone clarify?
343  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: real tag? on: September 06, 2013, 07:19:38 AM
Not original.
344  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Sound Dampening on: August 30, 2013, 08:33:16 PM
Anyone found any issues with these products trapping moisture/condensation? Especially in the roof area? I'm going to replace the original fibrous roof insulation, but don't want to put in something that could form a barrier to moisture, especially if it's not thick enough to act as an insulation layer.
345  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 1969 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28 with Rally Sport... RESTAMP on: August 30, 2013, 02:30:30 AM
So the ACA can't tell a real one from a clone when judging in the Bowtie class?
Or is that where the points were deducted.
Mike
Not familiar with this specific judging class, but believe that in some classes, if an owner discloses that a component on the car is restamped or NOM, they don't lose points. If they claim it is original, and the judges disagree, then points are deducted. However, disclosing restamps or NOM parts can preclude the car from certain categories. Anyone able to confirm?
As for the OP, perhaps the thread should be "possible" restamp, unless and until the person who believes it to be so, comes forward.
Pages: 1 ... 21 22 [23] 24 25 ... 33
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.094 seconds with 18 queries.