CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
October 01, 2014, 11:21:50 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
104994 Posts in 12266 Topics by 4728 Members
Latest Member: MartySS
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 30
31  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: ring and pinion date code on: July 05, 2014, 10:45:51 PM
Not sure on pinions, but the ring gear usually has part number, ratio (xx yy), and date code (m/mm, yy).
Here's an example from chevellestuff.net:
32  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Farewell And The Best For Ed! on: July 05, 2014, 08:26:27 PM
Ed, I'm sorry you have reached that decision, this forum will not be the same without your knowledgeable and considered opinion. I hope that in time you will return, but until then, thank you and take care.
33  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: trashing all interior i guess... what to keep? on: July 03, 2014, 10:50:53 PM
It almost looks like a cover plate / skid plate or something,   I just dont remember my 68 having that..  Ill try to get a pict at lunch.
Sounds like the wiring harness cover plate, is it 2 pieces (per side) of galvanised steel, wide at the rear and narrowing to a point at the kick panel?
Here's a picture:
34  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 1111480 Distributor Stamp on: July 01, 2014, 03:30:48 AM
Yep, that zero is very suspicious.
35  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Green tip dipstick on: June 27, 2014, 07:20:42 AM
came in the box with my 1969 dated NOS 302 pan.
Regards -
Not intending to HiJack, but I have never seen or heard of a dated oil pan? Where would date be located?
When I read that, I assumed it was the box it was in that was dated, but maybe the pans did have a date?
36  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Firewall to floor joint seam seal ??? on: June 27, 2014, 05:27:43 AM
Dave, mine only has the sealer on the interior side, and I can't recall seeing it on any underside before, in that location. I'd think that the concern with sealing both sides of a panel join is that it could form a moisture trap, but that may not be so. FWIW, I checked my 69 Fisher Body Manual but it doesn't appear to have any seam sealer location details.
37  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Length of J-bolt for spare in trunk on: June 25, 2014, 05:35:56 PM
Tim, AMK has the J hook, B-11380, 9&3/4" long. $8
Thanks Mike, appreciate the tip!
38  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: What's it worth, untouched Cortez silver 69 RS Z on: June 25, 2014, 01:38:02 AM
Didn't sell, now relisted with a Buy It Now of $16,000
http://www.ebay.com/itm/251569347790
39  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Grill emblem placement for a 1969 Z/28 RS vs Standard on: June 24, 2014, 05:03:32 PM
Many people can't get it in the correct place on non-RS cars either, so no surprise the RS owners are confused without GM documentation.
40  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Are these numbers good .. 69 Z ? on: June 23, 2014, 05:35:45 AM
Don't like the alt stamp.
41  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Another 99K 69 Z/28 on: June 21, 2014, 05:40:39 AM
One of my favorite colors, truly a stunning car.
Agree the tailpipes are at a wild angle though, and are those twin lines on the axle center consistent with original factory inspection marks?
42  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 69 Z28 carb fuel line bracket. on: June 20, 2014, 11:04:40 PM
Auction ended early "because there was an error in the listing". It only had 1 bid ($50) at the time, so presumably the owner accepted an offer and sold outside of ebay.
43  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Need help/picture to correct my 69 Z28 write up from Jerry MacNeish. on: June 19, 2014, 04:55:30 PM
Great, thanks for confirming, and for that last photo. Definitely appears that the rocker was masked off by the VN workers before the black was applied, way to neat of a line between the two otherwise.
44  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Need help/picture to correct my 69 Z28 write up from Jerry MacNeish. on: June 19, 2014, 06:59:12 AM
Oaklyss, in that last picture, is the horizontal area on the underside of the rocker bare metal? Can't tell, could be the flash effect, but it looks like there isn't even primer on there.

I think you are getting the flash along with the orange reflecting on the black giving it that bare metal look.  You can see the line where the black ends (or the bare metal looking area) and orange begins.
Yes but I asked the question because if you look at picture 1 in reply # 21, it looks similar, but without so much possible H.O. reflection.....
45  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: whats up with this Z on: June 19, 2014, 03:48:03 AM
When I looked at the ad earlier today at work (before it got removed), the X33 tag looked genuine but the car had some confusing details. The asking price suggested a NOM engine, and in the pictures it at least had an earlier style intake (from the front oil fill tube). Also was a 711 interior on the trim tag, but had standard seats and deluxe door panels in the pictures. Could still be a good buy at that price, but needed much more detail.
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 30
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.087 seconds with 18 queries.