CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
July 28, 2014, 11:32:44 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
102437 Posts in 12088 Topics by 4667 Members
Latest Member: hrascoll
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 18 19 [20] 21 22 ... 30
286  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: AIM Station Datums on: September 07, 2013, 07:30:07 PM
John, great info (as always). Were any of those reference points physically transferred onto the car during assembly? Otherwise, how were emblems and other items positioned to the AIM dimensions by the line workers?
(I do understand that the AIM is an engineering document, and not all details were for the worker's use/benefit).
287  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Muncie Transmission ID on: September 07, 2013, 07:24:19 PM
Had a Chevelle with that tag #.
288  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: AIM Station Datums on: September 07, 2013, 12:22:16 AM
Thanks for the reply Mark, appreciate the info.
289  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: 1969 Amp gauge problem on: September 06, 2013, 08:01:58 PM
When you shut the engine off, does the ammeter go to zero? And then go to discharge (-ve) if you turn on the headlights?
290  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: 1969 Amp gauge problem on: September 06, 2013, 07:56:15 PM
I believe that means the alternator is undercharging. Does the needle rise to zero (or higher) if you increase the engine revs?
291  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / AIM Station Datums on: September 06, 2013, 05:46:21 PM
The AIM diagrams sometimes include measurements from reference stations. An example would be the placement of emblems on body panels, and includes both longitudinal and transverse dimension references. Unless I've missed it, I couldn't find in the AIM where the datum (starting) point for these stations is. Can anyone clarify?
292  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: real tag? on: September 06, 2013, 07:19:38 AM
Not original.
293  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Sound Dampening on: August 30, 2013, 08:33:16 PM
Anyone found any issues with these products trapping moisture/condensation? Especially in the roof area? I'm going to replace the original fibrous roof insulation, but don't want to put in something that could form a barrier to moisture, especially if it's not thick enough to act as an insulation layer.
294  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 1969 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28 with Rally Sport... RESTAMP on: August 30, 2013, 02:30:30 AM
So the ACA can't tell a real one from a clone when judging in the Bowtie class?
Or is that where the points were deducted.
Mike
Not familiar with this specific judging class, but believe that in some classes, if an owner discloses that a component on the car is restamped or NOM, they don't lose points. If they claim it is original, and the judges disagree, then points are deducted. However, disclosing restamps or NOM parts can preclude the car from certain categories. Anyone able to confirm?
As for the OP, perhaps the thread should be "possible" restamp, unless and until the person who believes it to be so, comes forward.
295  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 69' Z/28 on eBay, Has no Tach?? on: August 26, 2013, 02:47:21 AM
Quote from: 69Z28-RS
There was a thread on Team Camaro from the fella who found and purchased those cars (from one older owner), but I was unable to find the thread when I looked again? Maybe it got removed.      He purchased the cars purely to resell.... but what I was able to see, looked real...
Gary, the link is in my post just above yours.
296  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Steering Column Sticker on: August 25, 2013, 10:09:21 PM
TK would have been the letter code in the steering column box on the build sheet.
I believe it was Box 61 on the BBC.
Oh, and nice work there Hans!
297  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 69' Z/28 on eBay, Has no Tach?? on: August 25, 2013, 10:04:26 PM
Previously discussed here.
Trans stamp looks good to me.
298  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Steering Column Sticker on: August 24, 2013, 07:23:38 AM
7804300 is the part # for 69 steering column assembly, all floor shift except w/tilt wheel (group 6.518) in the November 1968 Parts Catalogue
http://www.gmpartswiki.com/getbigpage?pageid=76171
299  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Amazing Survivor Chevrolets - Lambrecht Chevrolet Auction End on: August 22, 2013, 02:33:57 AM
That's been kicking round for ages, thought they would have done the auction thing by now..... Maybe trying to build interest??
300  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Exhaust on: August 17, 2013, 03:38:15 AM
Interesting that the Zone Letter refers to discontinuation of NC8 dual chambered exhaust for "Camaro SS". If that included Z28, perhaps it was a typo and meant to be "Camaros" ??
Pages: 1 ... 18 19 [20] 21 22 ... 30
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.092 seconds with 18 queries.