CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 17, 2014, 01:52:24 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
97119 Posts in 11685 Topics by 4578 Members
Latest Member: ronhill
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 15 16 [17] 18 19 ... 22
241  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Glass Production Date on: May 26, 2013, 02:48:20 PM
Thanks for your replies; Warren's car has an even wider glass date range than mine, so perhaps there is nothing unusual in seeing this, especially in LA cars?
242  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Glass Production Date on: May 25, 2013, 06:44:24 PM
Thanks, but I am quite sure of the date codes as listed.
243  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Glass Production Date on: May 25, 2013, 03:50:12 AM
In checking the original LOF glass on my 04A (of 1969) Van Nuys car, I noticed quite a range in the production date codes:
Windshield: XV (Feb 69)
Backlight: VX (Dec 68)
Driver's Door: LV-10 (Mar 69)
Both Quarters: NV-10 (Jan 69)
Passenger's Door: CX-10 (Nov 68)
Is this normal, to see such a wide range in glass production dates, from November to March on an April-built car?
244  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: DZ Stamp on: May 21, 2013, 05:12:30 AM
Is that a 3956618 block casting? Looks good to me, but the experts know their stuff and will no doubt comment.
245  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: manual trans neutral switch on: May 18, 2013, 09:53:24 PM
My original switch has black plastic just like the one Hans posted too, although it's not a late '69 car....
246  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 67-68-69 Original GM Camaro DOORS on: May 18, 2013, 07:37:20 PM
Thanks Scott
247  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: New creep on the block! on: May 17, 2013, 04:46:18 PM
If it is the same guy, he's dropped his base price significantly.
248  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 67-68-69 Original GM Camaro DOORS on: May 16, 2013, 09:08:02 PM
Not necessarily. The pair of 67 NOS fenders I have are stamped.
That's good to know Scott. Are they stamped in the same format?
249  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 67-68-69 Original GM Camaro DOORS on: May 16, 2013, 04:19:27 PM
The thread you started over at Team Camaro confirmed that original GM doors had a sheetmetal date stamp behind the interior door panel, but I guess that would not apply to NOS doors, only assembly-line doors that were installed on cars at the time of assembly.
250  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 4053 holley fast idle cam on: May 16, 2013, 01:04:56 AM
It's the part labelled 29 on the diagram, located HERE. I can't check my Holley parts catalog at the moment, but I'm sure if you called Holley Tech Support, they'd be able to look it up for you.
251  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Is it a real SS on: May 14, 2013, 06:38:40 AM
So it can have a 4P code but possibly not be a true SS?
4P can denote an L48 (SS 350) or an L30/M20; Worth reading these:
http://www.camaros.org/l30m20.shtml
http://www.camaros.org/numbers.shtml#67Codes
Your car's situation is very interesting, because if you read the above links, the timeframe for commencement of 4P on the tags for L30 cars is believed to be Late December 1966/January 1967, and although your car's trim tag is early December, the 10-bolt assembly date (if original to the car) is also late December. Hopefully Kurt will offer his opinion....
252  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Is it a real SS on: May 14, 2013, 03:39:50 AM
As your car currently has a TH350, the speedo cable is likely to be routed through the hole labelled 'Non-Muncie Hole' in the photo above (by the firewall use block). So if you definitely can't find the 'Muncie Hole' below the windshield wiper motor, looks like the car originally had a Saginaw 4-speed, which (as I understand it) rules out possibility of the car being a factory SS.
253  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Is it a real SS on: May 14, 2013, 02:15:19 AM
Any updates from the OP on firewall piercing for a Muncie or a Saginaw trans?
254  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Owner's Manual - 3rd Edition, 1969 on: May 13, 2013, 08:18:15 PM
Thanks Gary
255  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Owner's Manual - 3rd Edition, 1969 on: May 13, 2013, 04:31:11 PM
Thanks Ed, I now assume my manual is a reprint since those pages are not present, nor do they appear to have been torn out.
Pages: 1 ... 15 16 [17] 18 19 ... 22
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.086 seconds with 18 queries.