CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
January 28, 2015, 03:25:09 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
109191 Posts in 12646 Topics by 4861 Members
Latest Member: TFuehrer
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10] 11 12 ... 37
136  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Green tip dipstick on: June 27, 2014, 07:20:42 AM
came in the box with my 1969 dated NOS 302 pan.
Regards -
Not intending to HiJack, but I have never seen or heard of a dated oil pan? Where would date be located?
When I read that, I assumed it was the box it was in that was dated, but maybe the pans did have a date?
137  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Firewall to floor joint seam seal ??? on: June 27, 2014, 05:27:43 AM
Dave, mine only has the sealer on the interior side, and I can't recall seeing it on any underside before, in that location. I'd think that the concern with sealing both sides of a panel join is that it could form a moisture trap, but that may not be so. FWIW, I checked my 69 Fisher Body Manual but it doesn't appear to have any seam sealer location details.
138  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Length of J-bolt for spare in trunk on: June 25, 2014, 05:35:56 PM
Tim, AMK has the J hook, B-11380, 9&3/4" long. $8
Thanks Mike, appreciate the tip!
139  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: What's it worth, untouched Cortez silver 69 RS Z on: June 25, 2014, 01:38:02 AM
Didn't sell, now relisted with a Buy It Now of $16,000
http://www.ebay.com/itm/251569347790
140  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Grill emblem placement for a 1969 Z/28 RS vs Standard on: June 24, 2014, 05:03:32 PM
Many people can't get it in the correct place on non-RS cars either, so no surprise the RS owners are confused without GM documentation.
141  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Are these numbers good .. 69 Z ? on: June 23, 2014, 05:35:45 AM
Don't like the alt stamp.
142  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Another 99K 69 Z/28 on: June 21, 2014, 05:40:39 AM
One of my favorite colors, truly a stunning car.
Agree the tailpipes are at a wild angle though, and are those twin lines on the axle center consistent with original factory inspection marks?
143  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 69 Z28 carb fuel line bracket. on: June 20, 2014, 11:04:40 PM
Auction ended early "because there was an error in the listing". It only had 1 bid ($50) at the time, so presumably the owner accepted an offer and sold outside of ebay.
144  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Need help/picture to correct my 69 Z28 write up from Jerry MacNeish. on: June 19, 2014, 04:55:30 PM
Great, thanks for confirming, and for that last photo. Definitely appears that the rocker was masked off by the VN workers before the black was applied, way to neat of a line between the two otherwise.
145  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Need help/picture to correct my 69 Z28 write up from Jerry MacNeish. on: June 19, 2014, 06:59:12 AM
Oaklyss, in that last picture, is the horizontal area on the underside of the rocker bare metal? Can't tell, could be the flash effect, but it looks like there isn't even primer on there.

I think you are getting the flash along with the orange reflecting on the black giving it that bare metal look.  You can see the line where the black ends (or the bare metal looking area) and orange begins.
Yes but I asked the question because if you look at picture 1 in reply # 21, it looks similar, but without so much possible H.O. reflection.....
146  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: whats up with this Z on: June 19, 2014, 03:48:03 AM
When I looked at the ad earlier today at work (before it got removed), the X33 tag looked genuine but the car had some confusing details. The asking price suggested a NOM engine, and in the pictures it at least had an earlier style intake (from the front oil fill tube). Also was a 711 interior on the trim tag, but had standard seats and deluxe door panels in the pictures. Could still be a good buy at that price, but needed much more detail.
147  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Need help/picture to correct my 69 Z28 write up from Jerry MacNeish. on: June 19, 2014, 03:41:52 AM
Oaklyss, in that last picture, is the horizontal area on the underside of the rocker bare metal? Can't tell, could be the flash effect, but it looks like there isn't even primer on there.
148  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Cruise control? on: June 17, 2014, 08:13:32 AM
Did you download the 67 Chassis Service and Overhaul Manuals from the link in reply #4 above?
149  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 1969 Z28 X33 fire damaged on: June 17, 2014, 03:43:28 AM
You move fast Kevin - from "what's it worth?" to "sold" in a smidge over 24 hours!
150  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Length of J-bolt for spare in trunk on: June 16, 2014, 04:53:50 PM
Great photos, thanks Mike
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10] 11 12 ... 37
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.398 seconds with 18 queries.