CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 21, 2014, 02:11:55 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
97301 Posts in 11695 Topics by 4578 Members
Latest Member: ronhill
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 [9] 10 11 ... 22
121  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: BR or B-R on ignition coil can? on: November 04, 2013, 03:18:39 PM
Thanks for all your replies.
122  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: new restoration endevour on: November 03, 2013, 03:37:26 PM
seems over the years some kind of sticky goo dripped out of the cracked windshield and caused small bubbles all over.
I have a '69 that has stood since the early 70's when the PO quit racing it, and the dash pad has started to ooze a thick liquid, which looks very much like what your dash picture shows..... the original material has started to degrade and that is what is running down the vertical dash pad face:
123  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: new restoration endevour on: November 02, 2013, 11:13:12 PM
Very nice find, glad to know they're still out there. Great color too. Question - if that's original paint, that car would be great left as a survivor, far better than just another restored Camaro......
124  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Right hand door mirror mounting holes location on: November 02, 2013, 08:04:28 PM
This thread that I started over at Team Camaro a while ago may be the one Kurt is thinking of.
FWIW, I have started repairing the passenger door skin, but have yet to position and install the mirror yet, so can't provide a firm measurement at present.
125  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: welding on cast iron on: November 02, 2013, 11:05:49 AM
If you prepare the joint properly, use pre-heat, then weld with a high nickel content electrode, and wrap it up afterwards to cool slowly, it should be fine.
126  Orphans - documentation or VIN-stamped drivetrains - in search of the original cars / 1969 - Orphans / 9N508260 M20 for sale on eBay on: November 01, 2013, 12:25:07 AM
Early 1969 model year M20 (lacking assembly stamp suffix code as later transmissions do) listed on eBay.
3925660 main case.
Assembly stamp P9P06
Partial VIN 19N508260
Located Fort Lauderdale, Florida.
Seller ID sknaha
Listed with Buy It Now $1,100.00
http://www.ebay.com/itm/121205611772

127  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 69Z Brake Booster Oddity on: October 30, 2013, 08:20:39 PM
1968 booster tabs had a larger size font stamp, can't remember for sure but think 68 was 1/8" high letters and some time early in the 69 model year it changed to 1/16".
128  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: BR or B-R on ignition coil can? on: October 30, 2013, 08:18:09 PM
So BR is for earlier coils, and B-R for later ones, changing some time in 1968-onwards?
129  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / BR or B-R on ignition coil can? on: October 30, 2013, 12:40:06 AM
Can anyone please explain the difference in 'BR' and 'B-R' coil can stampings? I've seen both, and wonder if it changed over from one to the other at some point in production, or if both were used simultaneously on the assembly line.
If the stamps did change during production, which one would be correct for an 04A of 1969 LA-assembled car?
130  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 124379N561026 in database?? on: October 28, 2013, 09:16:52 PM
Are the experts of the opinion that the X55 tag is genuine?
131  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 69 Z on: October 24, 2013, 03:06:58 AM
The CRG members have previously said that if any component was not available to complete a car, then it would not commence assembly and would be rescheduled. I guess no way to say how often this happened, but could account for some close component stamps and trim tag dates.
132  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: original paint 69 Z on ebay... "survivor" on: October 21, 2013, 10:22:42 PM
Love that car! Congratulations Lawrence
133  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Original Hurst Shifter or Not on: October 20, 2013, 07:27:09 PM
I will have to go and check the numbers on my 04A car's shifter, I believe it starts with '39' but can't recall for sure.
Just checked shifter from my 04A car and it is 29D33D, so looks like both it and the 03D car (29D29C stamp) had February shifter bodies.
134  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Original Hurst Shifter or Not on: October 20, 2013, 10:53:33 AM
I have a shifter pulled from an 03D Los Angeles car on my desk right now, and it is stamped '29D29C' which would make it a February 1969 shifter body on a March-assembled car, if the above is correct.
I will have to go and check the numbers on my 04A car's shifter, I believe it starts with '39' but can't recall for sure.
135  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 1968 Camaro <wagon> - Oh the Indignity. on: October 12, 2013, 08:06:01 AM
Wonder how many people were interested until seller stated the trees weren't included in the deal.
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 [9] 10 11 ... 22
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.085 seconds with 18 queries.