CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
October 31, 2014, 10:05:01 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
105862 Posts in 12354 Topics by 4762 Members
Latest Member: HarryQ
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 ... 39
91  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / 69 Trim Tag D80 question on: July 12, 2014, 05:21:38 AM
My 11D Nor L48 (blue car for those that know) has/always had D80 since I owned the car. I have never had any reason to believe that it was not on the car since new. In other words, original D80 car. It could have been dealer added, I realize.
My question is: Would ALL D80 factory equipped cars (69) have that, D80, noted on the trim tag? Was the D80 notation added later in production or on there from begining of model year?
I am sorry, I did not do a search first if this has already been discussed.
92  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Words on back of sail panel (67) on: July 11, 2014, 09:50:13 PM
I think you are on the right track, at least that is my guess too(IMO). There were probably a stack of cut panels in addition to the uncut parts. This pair may have been the top of the stack and indicated that there were a 100 pair to the stack of this modified piece for lights. Makes sense to me anyway.
93  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Rear seat bulkhead #8 and #1 yellow chalk marks on 69 camaro on: July 10, 2014, 08:30:43 PM
Hi, Still looking for anyone with any suggestions to what these numbers could decode to. I seen on another forum a early 69 z28 had a LG7 on the bulkhead and the owner said it had a rare light green interior color which would maybe confirm the LG (light green) and he said the 7 decodes to z28 without style trim,  and I am not sure of the validity of that. Also another owner chimed in and said he had a LG1 on his bulkhead and his would decode as LG (light green) with a 1 meaning car with style trim or RS. So I was wandering if my 8 and 1 could mean z28 with style trim for my car which would be correct. Just throwing that out there. Thanks, Michael
If you have not already done so, go to the "search" feature and put in "bulkhead" or "crayon marks" or "bulk head". Quite a few posts on the topic regarding the RH crayon marks. No one knows about your LH marks or they would post (at least no one yet has replied). This info in the search explains what you ask regarding the LG7 and other codes found.
94  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Cowl Tag Codes Sep 68 vs Sep 69 on: July 10, 2014, 05:27:17 PM
  Since the '69 was a long model year run (July '68 to Nov '69) is there any difference in the date code for a car built in Sep '68 and a car built in Sep '69?

Thanks

Funny, the question was about Trim Tag date code-NOT X codes or markings on seat backs!
95  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Clutch Lower Push Rod Alignment & AIM? on: July 09, 2014, 08:26:07 PM
What I don't like is if you install as per AIM, it trys to push the fork off the bellhousing ball, and it wears out the fork clip. JMO again.
I agree. I don't care what AIM shows, if it works better the other way, that is how I would put it. It is just practicle engineering that would have a straight line positioning.
96  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Cowl Tag Codes Sep 68 vs Sep 69 on: July 08, 2014, 12:14:38 PM
No. In your example, 3rd week of September (09C), it would be the same on a 1968 tag and 69,70 etc....So, a Sept.68 and Sept.69 would both show 09C on the TT. Also, remember, the tag size changed between those two example dates. Make sure the VIN corresponds with the time frame of the TT.
97  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Do You Still Have Your First Car? on: July 03, 2014, 07:50:42 PM
Nick-That is a real inspiring story of "keeping the faith" and never giving up. Through thick and thin, trials and tribulation, a truly encouraging long relationship with your car.

George-Love that Caddy. Is that in Florida? Guessing by the house color and style. Like you love the old pics and stories.
98  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Happy Birthday 69Z28 on: July 02, 2014, 09:52:58 PM
congrats to you too, Gary W. You are a good looking Devil and the Mrs. is a real Peach. Nice pics.
99  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Chicken or the Egg? on: July 02, 2014, 06:39:35 PM
I knew better than to even get up this mornin'.!!

Hey Daniel, glad you got out of bed this morning. Glad to see you posting. it's been a while.
Is it just me? Are you getting old Gary? Ya only been 61 a day now. It has been awhile because that post is from Jan 2011!!!??? Huh Shocked Cheesy Embarrassed Tongue
100  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / 7/4 Happy Anniversary BULLITT65 on: July 02, 2014, 06:53:29 AM
11 Years??!! That woman has to be a saint Grin Grin
enjoy:
Dear Tech Support,
Last year I upgraded from Boyfriend 5.0 to Husband 1.0 and I noticed a distinct slowdown in the overall system performance, particularly in the flower and jewelery applications, which operated flawlessly under Boyfriend 5.0.

In addition, Husband 1.0 uninstalled many other valuable programs, such as Romance 9.5 and Personal Attention 6.5, and then installed undesirable programs such as NEWS 5..0, MONEY 3.0 and FOOTBALL 4.1.

Conversation 8.0 no longer runs, and House cleaning 2.6 simply crashes the system.

Please note that I have tried running Nagging 5.3 to fix these problems, but to no avail. What can I do?

Signed,

Reply From Tech Support:
DEAR Madam,

First, keep in mind, Boyfriend 5.0 is an Entertainment Package, while Husband 1.0 is an operating system.

Please enter command: ithoughtyoulovedme. html and try to download Tears 6.2 and do not forget to install the Guilt 3.0 update. If that application works as designed, Husband1.0 should then automatically run the applications Jewellry 2.0 and Flowers 3.5. However, remember, overuse of the above application can cause Husband 1.0 to default to Silence 2.5 or Beer 6.1.

Please note that Beer 6.1 is a very bad program that will download the Snoring Loudly Beta. Whatever you do, DO NOT under any circumstances install Mother-In-Law 1.0 (it runs a virus in the background that will eventually seize control of all your system resources.)

In addition, please do not attempt to reinstall the Boyfriend 5.0 program. These are unsupported applications and will crash Husband 1.0.

In summary, Husband 1.0 is a great program, but it does have limited memory and cannot learn new applications quickly. You might consider buying additional software to improve memory and performance. We recommend: Cooking 3.0 and Hot Looks 7.7.

Good Luck Madam!
101  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 1969 Camaro Z28 Slot Car Track costs $85,000 on: July 01, 2014, 10:13:51 PM
Art is art?!Kind of a head scratcher.
102  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Eaton Detroit Spring on: July 01, 2014, 03:25:25 PM
Jack, You can find 10 pages of posts with the word "leaf spring", just insert that word in the search box in upper LH . Here is one relevant post if originality is your bag.
http://www.camaros.org/forum/index.php?topic=12293.0 Bob Harris-IE Camaro Specialties=yes, Detroit Spring=not sure, but would say, no, until otherwise heard in replies.
103  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Happy Birthday 69Z28 on: July 01, 2014, 07:36:18 AM
69Z28 aka Gary C. turned the big 61 today!!! Wish him a Hap-hap-happy one! Grin   A toast to you Gary and thanks for your contributions. I'll drink a beer in your honor tonight. Wink

A link to save a step for you all: http://www.camaros.org/forum/index.php?action=profile;u=3786
104  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Do You Still Have Your First Car? on: June 30, 2014, 01:35:36 PM
I turned 16 in Dec of 76. I could not wait to take driver ed. at school because I would not get my license until the end of school year, so I went to a private driving school and got my license in Jan. of 77. Dad dictated what we could drive and bought us cars because he wanted something safe. I did not like my choices. Ist I got my older brothers car, a Mercedes 220 Diesel. A uncool slug of a car. Then, a 69 Cutlass 2dr 6 cylinder that dad got from his insurance guy. It was his son's car. It was Robin Egg blue(yuk). I worked at gas stations and tire stores because I wanted to learn how to work on cars. I bought air shocks,painted the rear axle yellow,cut off the NEW exhaust to make it loud(although a sick sounding drone) and put bald wide tires I took off a "hippie van" at the tire store on ralleyII wheels also freebies from the store. After working the second summer and now, 17, I bought my own ride, a 67 SS Chevelle 396. Dad was not happy at all! That fall, he sent me to Military School. Upon graduating in 79. I bought the 2 69 Camaro I still have and another 67 Chevelle SS (Maroon). Sold that when I married, but still have a soft spot for 67 Chevelles and would like another someday. Green P.U. in background is a 71 Chev 3/4 (still have it as well!). Cutlass in background in 1st pic. Dad got rid of it when he found out I was going to put a 389 tri-power in it that I was dealing on. Wish I had kept a set of those Cragars. Tongue
105  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: BB Radiator on: June 29, 2014, 01:49:40 PM
That's an easy one, http://www.manta.com/c/mmljmms/powell-radiator-service  Steve Powell has done some incredible work on all types of radiators. He has done many one off, unique and exact fabrication work on Pebble Beach Concours level cars. He knows details and knows GM 60's radiators. I know you would be happy with what he can perform and the attention to detail.
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 ... 39
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.096 seconds with 18 queries.