CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2014, 05:17:11 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
97207 Posts in 11691 Topics by 4578 Members
Latest Member: ronhill
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 ... 23
91  Model Specific Discussions / Trans-Am Camaros / Re: 45th anniversary of the first Z-28 on: March 11, 2014, 09:57:27 AM
Jon, I have been wanting to ask, are you putting that 1/4 mounted gas cap back on? Looks like you are creating the "as raced" look.
92  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Another Restamp Sold For Big Bucks on: March 10, 2014, 10:36:26 PM
what is a Cheville ?
Well, you had to ask...http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/cheville also French for foot or ankle.

Back when I worked at a speed shop around 1980, and this is a true story, a fella came in wanting a part for a "Novelle". After trying to explain that there is no such animal, he insisted we look at his car to prove his ignorance. I and another co-worker went out to the parking lot and lo and behold, there it was, a Novelle! It was a Nova for sure, but someone had taken a Chevelle emblem and spliced the two together on the trunk,lol. So, there you have it...Novelle!!
93  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: CRG etiquette concerning parts on E Bay on: March 10, 2014, 08:16:02 PM
That's a little pricey. I have one that has been in my inventory since I bought my first camaro in 1975. Send me a PM, I would sell mine for half of that.
Buddy
That, my friends, is a true CRGer! Very kind gesture Buddy. I hope he takes you up on this. It is not even my car and I am excited for 69 SS X55. I hope we all can help each other get our cars finished. Thanks.
94  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 396 350hp fuel pump on: March 10, 2014, 06:29:17 PM
Dating pumps goes like this: 1965 rebuild-able pumps have a part number followed by 2 letters. 1st letter is month,2nd is year.An example would be : 4657KE (Nov. 1965) 1965 ended in E, 66=F
Crimped pumps were phased in around mid-year (June)1966. At this time the 2 letter dating preceded part#(at beginning). An example would be: GF40433 (July 1966) for 67 model year car. 2nd letter is year where: F=1966,G=67',H=68',I=69',J=70'. The months, 1st letter, are A-L=Jan-Dec. Starting in 1971 a new Julian alpha/numeric dating was used. An example :219K40956 (219th day of 1971)This would be for a 1972 car as this is late in the year, but shows that dates follow calendar and not model year. K=1971 remembering this includes 1972 models up to Dec 1971. L=72 and so-forth. Hawks pump is: 343K40727. The 343 is 343rd day of K=1971 (Dec  1971),which is late in year and considered a 1972 pump by model year production.
95  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 396 350hp fuel pump on: March 10, 2014, 02:20:49 PM
Thanks!   Couple more questions..
How does the date decode? 343=Julian date day of year? K=1973?
Do you know what the 69 code would be?
Also, can anyone tell me if the 69 model was bolted or crimped?

Again, Thank you!
To answer your question about bolted or crimped. The original pump look just like the picture provided by SgtHawk=crimped. Most GM pumps are crimped, I believe the ZL1 was bolted together and some early  pumps pre-67 and maybe some large truck comercial applications. I am sure someone will tell me different, but forgive my memory on this. The main point is the pump you want will be crimped.
Here is a thread of use and do a search "fuel pump date" and there are other posts. http://www.camaros.org/forum/index.php?topic=11520.0

A side note: SgtHawk I think your pump is for H.P. application, i.e. L78. L34=40568
96  Model Specific Discussions / 6-cylinder Camaros / Re: L6 starters on: March 10, 2014, 12:11:13 PM
more pics:Middle is solenoid #, alum. front cover.
97  Model Specific Discussions / 6-cylinder Camaros / Re: L6 starters on: March 10, 2014, 12:07:27 PM
But that's not confirming the Camaro application. Smiley
Sounds like this starter had many 69 L6 applications.

Kurt
You are right. Best I could come up with. The mounting holes are straight across, one short,one long bolt.

98  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Can 67 SB Engine Frame mounts be accidently switched? on: March 10, 2014, 07:45:35 AM
   As I said the car is running fine now with no issues, this just "bugs" me that I needed that spacer.  Any ideas are appreciated.  I'm a little OCD and I just want it right.  My wife bought me a T-shirt for Christmas says; I have OCD and ADD,  so everything has to be perfect, but only for a little while.  Fits!!!   Thanks

Mike, Do you think we should start a club? Change the name of the site, here? Maybe start a support group? I got a big smile over what you said about OCD, because I am in that camp. I would venture to say, most of our members would fall into that group too as we obsess over our cars. I want one of those shirts too!!
I really do not think your mounts could be switched, but I do not have a 67, nor have I seen pics of your car, so will not comment any further. If you could just channel that energy that has you worried about your car and use it towards getting my car done,lol...see, I am obsessing over my car!
Sounds like you need to get that thing "un-packed" and start getting pictures posted. The sooner you get her back out of her cocoon, the sooner the weather will straighten out (weather is waiting on you and not vice-verse). Have a great day.
99  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: CRG etiquette concerning parts on E Bay on: March 10, 2014, 07:09:41 AM
Just don't be shocked if a CRG member bids against you.
Also don't be surprised if a fellow CRGer has the same item you are looking for and will make you a better deal, just because you are a member and contributor and they don't mind helping you out as long as they know it is not being flipped on Ebay.
100  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Z/28 stripes...pin stripes on: March 10, 2014, 07:02:54 AM
I assume (hate doing that) you are referring to the stripes that where on the wheel lip eyebrows. This topic was discussed just this past week regarding Z/28s in this thread: http://www.camaros.org/forum/index.php?topic=11898.0  I know the topic started may throw you off, but at post #10 is where the stripes are addressed and JohnZ has an answer in post #17.
101  Model Specific Discussions / 6-cylinder Camaros / Re: L6 starters on: March 09, 2014, 02:11:06 PM
I'd like to confirm the starter usage on L6 cars.
So I'm looking for the original starter numbers off of any 67-69 L6 car.
Especially 67 since manual and auto may have used different part #'s.

Pretty sure the 69 L6 starter I have at home is 1108365. It will be a while before I can confirm that....

Thanks!

X2 Kurt. I can confirm a 1969 6 cylinder laying out in the shed (untouched/unmolested original down to heater hoses and air cleaner filter,which I personally pulled) has its original starter and it is 1108365 also. It also has McKinnon stamped on it as the car was of Canadian build (Buick). Also, there is a real low hour/mileage L6 GM engine (born with) in my 1969 Gleaner K Combine and it, too, has a 1108365 on it.
102  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: widow felts nos vs. A.Mrkt. on: March 09, 2014, 01:30:17 PM
 Wink Thanks Mike. I guess to try to clarify my position I have, up to this point, always bought original OEM or NOS items ONLY. I have not bought anything repro, quite proud of that, I may add. I am getting to a point in parts buying where I realize that repro will be the only route as the price of NOS is too high for me IMO. Most of the items I speak of are soft items like rubber, foam, plastic, and vinyl. Things like weatherstrips and trunk mat. The other items are pot metal where it might be too costly to re-plate. I am a purist and like things as correct as possible. If there is anything that falls under the categories mentioned (soft and pot metal) that the repro is just not acceptable because of appearance, fit and quality and is so sub-standard that it is obvious to most that it is not "correct" then I would like to know. I asked about felts because I have a chance to get a set of outer NOS. I know I would prefer to have them over the repro, but for cost consideration. I will compromise (or should say I have to) up to a point, but if the repro part is just flat wrong and a flimsy cheap imitation, I want to know and at that point, I will have to suck it in and get NOS.
103  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: I had a Camaro Day with a fellow CRGer, we had fun on: March 08, 2014, 09:51:53 PM
Always nice to see members meeting in the real world. Glad things are back on the the track and at full throttle.

Full throttle??...My bank account has a governor on it,lol   
I'll add, I had to leave my house a 5 am to meet up with Bueny at 7 am. Did not get home till 8 pm! Long day, for sure. Bueny was disappointed as he planned on taking a maiden voyage in his COPO clone, but weather did not co-operate.
104  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / I had a Camaro Day with a fellow CRGer, we had fun on: March 08, 2014, 09:31:17 PM
As some of you have followed, my car's restoration had stalled when I was having difficulty finding someone to do the body work on my 69. After a plea and post on here and several supportive members coming forward, I believe things are back on track. A heartfelt thanks to all who have helped. One member, Buenymayor, told me about his body guy and sent me pics and helped me make contact with , mrls6, in Ft. Wayne,Ind. I had a good feeling about this guy from the first contact. Today, Buenymayor and I met at his house in downtown Buena Vista, Ind. and drove up to see his car and to give me a chance to meet mrls6 in person. We all hit it off and we all had a lot more in common than just our love of Camaros. Arrangements have been made for my car to be started on in April. He(mrls6) is finishing up on Buenymayor's car right new. Thanks CRG and get ready to follow this restoration as things progress. Yea, I am nervous about the money holding out, but I only have this one life and don't want to have regrets, so will press forward and try and join the ranks of restored correctly Camaro owners. Now, I am in S.W. Ohio and Ft. Wayne is not in my backyard, but mrls6 impressed me with his knowledge and desire and ability to do the job right. So, looks like I have a plan. Wish me luck! Wink
105  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: How long have you owned your Camaro? on: March 06, 2014, 01:48:50 PM
Joe, What all did you add, option wise? Do you have a pic of what it looked like when you first got it? In its $800 form? Car looks outstanding now. Like the color.
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 ... 23
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.094 seconds with 18 queries.