CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
November 24, 2014, 04:38:21 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
106545 Posts in 12423 Topics by 4788 Members
Latest Member: capt68
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 33 34 [35] 36 37 ... 39
511  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / 1969 DANZ show car on CL on: October 30, 2013, 10:00:57 PM
interesting!  check it out
512  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 124379N561026 in database?? on: October 30, 2013, 09:15:37 AM

I suspect the X55 tag could be real. X77 isn't.

Could an X55 have had that M21 trans? Thought that was a solid lifter and 396/350hp only?
513  Site Comments / Discussion / Test Drive / test on: October 29, 2013, 07:17:14 AM
514  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 124379N561026 in database?? on: October 27, 2013, 10:31:02 AM
Thought someone may want to know the latest morph on this:
515  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Late post August 69 BB power steering bracket on: October 24, 2013, 10:45:02 PM
Saw a restored SS Big Block car that was a late production (post August 69)car. It had a power steering bracket like the 1970 model year type. Is this correct? Or, did they use the 1969 bracket setup the entire run?
516  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 69 Z on: October 23, 2013, 02:47:30 PM
I will let the experts chime in. Based on my serial number of my 12B car and using the 912 cars per day built that has been established and using published end of month production serial numbers I can surmise: My car was completed probably on the 18th of December. The car could have entered the assembly side of plant on the 13th and 2-3 days later,as said, exited plant, putting it around 18th. If you look at my other example, my March 3E car: If it hit the plant on 5th week (one day=31st) of March, It had to be completed after April6th, because the rear in that car is dated April 7th. That is my point and why I feel it is possible. The trim tag date "loosely" corresponds with calendar as I have understood.
517  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 69 Z on: October 23, 2013, 02:09:14 PM
I would say yes. I have a 12B and it has a 1122 (Nov.22) original rear. I also have a 3E, 5th week of March, which has a 0407 (April,7) original rear!
518  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: anyone see this ?? on: October 23, 2013, 11:08:25 AM
I believe this was noted last week. Here is a link to that thread:
519  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 1969 BB Exhaust Manifold bolts on: October 21, 2013, 02:13:21 PM
Hey Don and gang,
No need to take the blame on the terminology, it's not a Cannuck thing this time, it was me. I referred to bolts as shouldered in my initial post and ,yes, I guess I meant flanged. You see what getting old does to you!,LOL. Thanks Steve for straightening me and Don out. Thanks Steve also for the pic. I have several topics that I want to clarify and get frustrated when a catalog says one thing, a forum on another site says something else, guy tells me something else. I always come to the CRG to get the truth. Bentley.
520  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Z10 on: October 21, 2013, 09:08:40 AM
Man, if you can see a missing VIN plate from those pix, then you are an 'eagle eye'..  *G*   
I think what was meant is since no Vin is provided, it makes it hard to compare with Trim Tag body build # and date aligning. My first thought is if someone is so knowledgeable about the Z10 option, why can't he verify if the drivetrain is # matching? Seems that he leaves out just enough info to make me want to question car.i am not saying it is fake, because there is not enough info, but as knowledgeable as the owner seems...just saying.
521  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 1969 BB Exhaust Manifold bolts on: October 21, 2013, 08:50:25 AM
Thanks SZteve and Don. Guess you can see why I am having so much trouble with this ?
522  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 1969 BB Exhaust Manifold bolts on: October 18, 2013, 10:40:04 PM
Thank you Don. I was pretty sure on there being two bolts, just needed confirmation. Too many resto catalogs tell you wrong info. I 'll throw the washers back in with the SB bolts bin.
523  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / 1969 BB Exhaust Manifold bolts on: October 18, 2013, 03:36:04 PM
Did a lot of research on this site and TC with no definitive answer, so here goes: 1969 396 exhaust manifold bolts-cast iron heads. I know the resto parts book show a shouldered bolt used throughout, but a guy I met at a show with a 69 396 Chevelle tells me that 2 different bolts were used. Where the larger hole is in the manifold, the bolt with washer is used and the shouldered are used on the other holes. This would be 1/2 and 1/2,8 shouldered and 8 w/washers, if correct. Can someone shed some light? Along this topic, as I understand, No french locks used? No heat shields on plugs? correct? Wanting to put an end to the BS and get the facts. Thanks, as always.
524  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: To the paint shop! on: October 15, 2013, 08:05:20 PM
Congrats! Janobyte. I am still waiting for "that" call. Body man has put me off another year, need to find a new one soon if this guy can't do it although he is my first choice, I don't have a second choice. I am afraid I may loose interest if this drags out too long. By the way, If my car's body and paint looked as good as your before pics, I would have been happy with that and left it alone. Makes my car look like a real dog...sorry, no offense to dogs (wife and I are dog lovers).
525  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Research Topics & Reports / Re: 69 owners with "Pebble-grained" steering wheels (not shrouds) please check in on: October 03, 2013, 10:12:17 PM
I have Two cars that have their original wheels. I believe my 307 car has the N30 after I describe the interior, you judge. This car has some unusual options for a base model like U17,M20,U73,U80,N44,D55,D90,U35,U63,U25-26-27-28-29 aux. lighting. Anyway her goes:
1)Base Coupe LF7 307
5)NO Z23-No dash assist-pedal bright trim-does have wood-grain on headlight sw. and radio and console and steering wheel.
6)pebble grain with wood-grain insert in center-and yes, this is original I have owned since 1985 car is virtually untouched w/original paint,wheels etc..

2nd car:
1)SS Coupe L48
6)pebble grain w/wood grain in center- SS emblem owned since '79
Pages: 1 ... 33 34 [35] 36 37 ... 39
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.085 seconds with 18 queries.