CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 29, 2015, 12:29:19 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
111372 Posts in 12824 Topics by 4913 Members
Latest Member: devodave
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 ... 76
91  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: dz Carburator 4053 stamping on: January 21, 2015, 11:04:21 AM
December 1st week of 1967.  He sent me pics of the carb.  It is legit.
92  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: dz Carburator 4053 stamping on: January 21, 2015, 09:24:20 AM
There isnt a 781.  The one in question from the OP is 7B1
93  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Vintage 1967 Yenko photo's on: January 21, 2015, 08:11:07 AM
Was the 2 other emblems the cross flags (cant remember what the black car looked like)?  This car started out as a small block by the looks of the fenders or am I missing something?
94  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Pictures I found on the web enjoy! on: January 21, 2015, 08:05:15 AM
There is a video of Miranda Lambert and Danica Patrick stealing a guys 69 Camaro... maybe someone can link it, I can't. "Fastest Girl in Town"


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EbaEVA259IE


Looks like it was filmed here on the opposite side of Nashville..  Nice to see a 1st gen without a spoiler & the DX1..

95  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Part Number Stamp or Sticker on Wiper Motor Assy on: January 20, 2015, 02:33:57 PM
you just looking for 69's ?

68's arent cool enough for some of these guys.. Grin
96  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 5460346 Master Cylinder on: January 20, 2015, 10:12:05 AM
Nope sorry.
97  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 5460346 Master Cylinder on: January 20, 2015, 09:44:25 AM
12D of 1967 (68 model)  LOS



98  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Bad Luck is Better Than No Luck; Right? on: January 20, 2015, 07:52:07 AM
Its certainly possible but the bends are different.  That doesn't mean that they didn't change their design.  I always thought they were Thorley headers but when I called them about a week ago and asked they didn't have any old catalogs and the part # for the 325 was for a newer model LS swap header..  I asked this question over on Yenko in the "Day 2" section and another member there posted what he had which was an old catalog and the part #'s are different.  So I really do not know at this point.
99  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Bad Luck is Better Than No Luck; Right? on: January 19, 2015, 09:15:12 PM
They are 2" primaries & 3.5" collectors.  Brand is unknown.  They were for a non p/s car so the primary tube had to be "messaged" to make them fit.  They are around 35-40 years old.  I had them blasted and coated them myself.  Part # on the flanges are L 325 & R 325.
100  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Bad Luck is Better Than No Luck; Right? on: January 19, 2015, 08:01:53 AM
Thanks guys.  I hope to hear it run in the car by this coming weekend.  I hope.  Once I finish it Ill post a video of the whole car after I do a deeeeeeep clean. Grin
101  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Bad Luck is Better Than No Luck; Right? on: January 18, 2015, 08:23:23 PM
Baby steps.  Almost there.



102  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: CLEAR COATING ALUMINUM GRILL TRIM ??? on: January 16, 2015, 03:09:55 PM
Thanks Darrel
Good Info, that intake looks super Grin


thanks.
103  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: CLEAR COATING ALUMINUM GRILL TRIM ??? on: January 16, 2015, 03:09:21 PM
If it were my parts I would tape off (just James mentioned) the polished areas and get either glacier black or black velvet.  Unless you are doing something more along the lines of custom then you could do another color to accent the body color..  I also only use air cure coatings.  Unless you have an extra oven; you do not want to use your home oven for curing.  If you are married..   Grin
104  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: CLEAR COATING ALUMINUM GRILL TRIM ??? on: January 16, 2015, 03:01:51 PM
Far from a professional.  I just use a HPLV gun (got a little 4oz job from Harbor Freight).  I turn down my compressor to 60psi and hold the gun to 25psi.  If you go to the website they give you the basics on how to spray their coatings.  I had the headers blasted and then just wiped them down with mineral spirits and let dry then sprayed the coating.  Intake I just pressure washed and cleaned really well then sprayed.  Bearings I hit with a scothbrite pad then cleaned with alcohol then sprayed.  You can buy their tester bottles and it will go a long way.  The bearings and piston skirts I used about 6 oz of coating and around 2 oz on the piston tops and cc.  I bought a pint of the titanium color for the intake and headers and I still have half a bottle.

Also do several test passes until you get the pattern you want down.  I usually hit the entire part with a light coat then wait a few minutes and start hitting the hard to reach spots and then go from there.  Mostly like painting a car or anything else with a HPLV spray gun.
105  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: CLEAR COATING ALUMINUM GRILL TRIM ??? on: January 16, 2015, 01:54:53 PM
I too use Cerakote coatings.  I love the product.

Titanium is the color I used on the intake and headers.





Intake before.



Intake after.





I also used the micro slick coat on the pistons & bearings.  Along with the piston coat on the pistons & combustion chambers.





Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 ... 76
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.354 seconds with 18 queries.