CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
January 26, 2015, 08:08:05 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
109120 Posts in 12636 Topics by 4860 Members
Latest Member: 67rsz
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 51 52 [53] 54 55 ... 70
781  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 124379N561026 in database?? on: October 29, 2013, 07:52:16 AM
Both tags are fake.  Just my $0.02
782  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Antenna - Rear Quarter on: October 28, 2013, 08:35:14 PM
I know of 2 68's both originally AM radios, both non spoiler cars & one was rear & the other was front..  So I'm not sure there was a standard for non spoiler AM cars...

All spoiler cars were front fender regardless radio
AM/FM were front fender
AM with no spoiler I've seen both ways...
783  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: black on tailpan on ss cars on: October 28, 2013, 08:11:14 AM
Let me pose this question.  Could it be that different gloss levels were used on different years?
784  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: black on tailpan on ss cars on: October 27, 2013, 05:06:42 PM
FWIW..  Original paint 68 3D build L78 with 68K miles and has been garage kept all its life..






I can get better pics if needed..  
785  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: First attempt at Zinc Plating on: October 27, 2013, 03:15:37 PM
Ok sounds good just let me know !!  :-)
786  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 124379N561026 in database?? on: October 27, 2013, 01:19:44 PM
Yeah that is pretty bad...  What is this world coming to...  Sad.. Sad
787  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: First attempt at Zinc Plating on: October 27, 2013, 01:03:53 PM
After a week off for home improvements   Roll Eyes   and cleaning up the garage due to the improvements I got back to doing a little plating..  I also polished the parts like Jim suggested.

Heres before



After cleaning



Then plating finished





788  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 69 Z on: October 25, 2013, 04:05:04 PM
Technically, We said it was possible..  Kurt makes a valid point that he/we could narrow it down more with the vin.  You will still need the p-o-p or mso or other proof for it to be 100% correct.   Wink

I just want to make sure there is no confusion.

Hope everything checks out and works out.   Smiley
789  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Production Schedule around Holidays on: October 25, 2013, 12:36:11 PM
Another quick question.  Would they have worked Saturday to make up for the Monday which was Christmas?
790  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Production Schedule around Holidays on: October 25, 2013, 12:32:24 PM
Thanks John!!
791  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Production Schedule around Holidays on: October 24, 2013, 07:26:23 PM
Specifically Christmas 1967 & New Years 1968 timeframe?  Any differences between plants ?  More curious about Van Nuys..
792  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 69 Z on: October 23, 2013, 02:46:33 PM
Just because it is a 12B car doesnt mean it was finished that same week..   Wink


I feel like the rear is definitely possible for that car.  Of course without papers it will be a useless discussion..
793  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 1968 camaro clone on: October 22, 2013, 06:49:52 AM
Yep and its a shame they didnt paint it back Lemans Blue...
794  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 1968 camaro clone on: October 21, 2013, 02:59:41 PM
I dont disagree..  I hate the plastic covers.  Id rather see the engine.  I guess when you have to appeal to the general public you have to make covers to make it visually appealing..  Oh well I am happy with either old school or new technology (minus the covers).  Also depends on the look and style you are going after.   Wink


BACK ON TOPIC:

I would say most have already hit the common questions to ask about or look for.  I agree with Charley too, I would offer him 18-20  and go from there; as long as everything else checked out.  You can personalize it later on.  Bottom line is if you like the car and it meets your standards then go for it. 
795  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 1968 camaro clone on: October 21, 2013, 11:33:11 AM
LS engines are great..  super power, much better gas mileage, esp when you install the appropriate O/D trans with it, but don't you wish the LS engines were not so UGLY?  Smiley

Come on now..  How could you say no to one of these.. Shocked







Pages: 1 ... 51 52 [53] 54 55 ... 70
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.393 seconds with 19 queries.