CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
August 02, 2014, 03:35:33 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
102560 Posts in 12096 Topics by 4669 Members
Latest Member: paulmanta
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 21 22 [23] 24 25 ... 55
331  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Stainless Chambered exhaust on: February 07, 2014, 08:18:43 PM
Aluminized exhaust


http://www.imcoweb.com/


At least that is what I come up with from my detective work.. Huh
332  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 1967 Metal Seatbacks on: February 07, 2014, 08:10:14 PM
Mike you are the man!!!  Can you give me these dimension also?  & the thickness?  Thanks again!!!


333  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 1967 Metal Seatbacks on: February 07, 2014, 04:16:16 PM
Thanks Mike!
334  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / 1967 Metal Seatbacks on: February 07, 2014, 03:46:19 PM
Does anyone have or can get the dimensions of the upper hook on the seatback for the metal back on 67 seats?  I need dimensions of the bracket and of its location.  Thanks, Darrell

Stole this from another members post.   Grin

335  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Stainless Chambered exhaust on: February 07, 2014, 03:33:34 PM
I believe 400 series stainless is magnetic and 300 series is not, unless certain machining is perforned on it such as threads and such.

Correct.

400 series has little to no nickel in it which makes it magnetic and is also cheaper in price to produce.  300 series has more nickel and is in turn non magnetic and cost is increased due to the nickel content.  I would say the exhaust is 400 series stainless.  400 will rust; or oxidize, if not cared for over time.
336  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Stainless Chambered exhaust on: February 07, 2014, 08:56:40 AM
So if you 'lost' around 7hp with a chambered exhaust and stock exhaust manifolds, would you expect to regain those 7hp with chambered exhaust and long tube headers?
Also, would imagine that in reality, there could be at least a 7hp variance between 2 otherwise identical (drivetrain) cars off the factory assembly line.

Ding ding ding!!

With my experience of putting countless late model LT & LS cars on a chassis dyno  some cars put down a few extra ponies than another.  Same setup put it boils down to tolerance stackup.  You have mins & maxs and it you have the incorrect balance then you will have the lower output rate.  Same can be said about the opposite.  The fact is you are not going to feel 7 or 10 or even 15hp by the ole "buttometer"..  Even the calibrated ones.. Grin  If you are not competitively racing then its all about sound.  If you like the sound of chambered then install it.  If not then sell it.
337  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 4053 DZ carburator on: February 06, 2014, 08:48:28 PM
Honestly we are talking about 20 cfm.  When working at Holley; there were/are variances when flowing a carb that will be as much as a couple 100 cfm.  Usually you use the mean of a batch and come to your cfm flow.  USUALLY..  Has there been carbs that have been manufactured that were suppose to a certain cfm and fell short?  Of course, its like any testing batch testing.  All the tolerances that are used (especially back then) if you had a base plate that was at its min tolerance and a venturi  at it max then you will not get optimum flow because you will create turbulence.  When testing you want best case scenerios to get the best results possible.   
338  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Identifying Original Console Gauges on: February 05, 2014, 05:15:19 PM
Good deal.  It is great to have everyone willing to help others out with figuring these cars out.  Thank you again EVERYONE!!


Even Gary.   Tongue
339  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Identifying Original Console Gauges on: February 05, 2014, 02:16:03 PM
lol

340  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Identifying Original Console Gauges on: February 05, 2014, 12:58:19 PM
Darrell,

1) I didn't see any stamped dates/codes on my gauges...
2) My car (which the gauges came from) is a Sept '69 (09C) production date (late, which might explain the 'smoooth' finish, vs the 'brushed' finish question you asked?)
3) The difference between production parts and service parts (re the 'crinkley corner bends') could be a change in Al alloy, in addition to a change in supplier?
4) I'm confident you noted the similarity between the bright orange fluorescent and 'hugger' orange?  Smiley   The names may change, but it's still 'hugger' ..  just with a fluorescent glow.. Smiley


Changing of material is probably true.  


As for the color...  Whatever helps you sleep at night.. Roll Eyes  I think Im gonna substitute Hugger Orange with Carousel Red when Im talking to you from now on out.


 Grin
341  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Identifying Original Console Gauges on: February 05, 2014, 11:38:09 AM
Also notice in the corners were the bends are on the two gauges I show originally and in Gary's pics.  Originals seem to have a crinkle finish in the curvature were as the service replacements are smooth.







342  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Identifying Original Console Gauges on: February 05, 2014, 11:36:08 AM
I see the lens scratches and that not what I am referring to; your temp gauge face is just like the fuel gauge pic I posted.  Im beginning to think there may have been a change to the face during production..?..
343  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Identifying Original Console Gauges on: February 05, 2014, 11:07:36 AM
Ed you can see that your temp gauge looks brushed on the face but the rest look silver.  Kinda hard to tell.  Can you look when you have time and see if all are brushed?
344  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: And I Thought The Snow Was Bad...Now Ice on: February 05, 2014, 09:38:25 AM
Just enjoy the view, and try to survive the temps, and hopefully any damage isn't permanent...  Smiley 

X2
345  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Identifying Original Console Gauges on: February 05, 2014, 09:32:58 AM
OMG...   Roll Eyes

lol
Pages: 1 ... 21 22 [23] 24 25 ... 55
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.089 seconds with 18 queries.