CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 16, 2014, 08:05:15 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
97110 Posts in 11684 Topics by 4578 Members
Latest Member: ronhill
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 19 20 [21] 22 23 ... 39
301  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: GM silver for Rally wheels. on: October 30, 2013, 10:38:58 AM
John Z's article is always a go-to source for info.  If not the entire article, read Paint Shop Operations, to include how wheels were shipped in rail cars.
http://www.camaros.org/assemblyprocess.shtml



I have read the assembly process before.  My comment was for rally wheels..  I guess I didnt make that clear..
302  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 124379N561026 in database?? on: October 30, 2013, 09:54:53 AM

I suspect the X55 tag could be real. X77 isn't.

Could an X55 have had that M21 trans? Thought that was a solid lifter and 396/350hp only?


I was waiting for someone to spot that!!! Wink


http://www.camaros.org/trans.shtml#4speed
303  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 124379N561026 in database?? on: October 30, 2013, 08:36:17 AM
Quote from: z28z11[/quote
Bulkhead reads "X5" or "X7" - can't tell. Deck stamp looks decent, but the whole thing gets worse all the time. Trans stamp looks decent. I'd bet the X55 stamp was original, then changed to an X77 at some point - you think ?

Like any other car - if all the documentation you have is a cowl tag, you'd best look real close - at everything.

Regards,
Steve

It almost looks as if it was X5 and someone changed the 5 to a 7..  Would need a much better pic to be able to tell.
304  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 124379N561026 in database?? on: October 30, 2013, 08:32:22 AM
I suspect the X55 tag could be real. X77 isn't.

You are probably right but for some reason it doesnt look right to me... Huh  I guess that is why I will never consider myself an expert..   Grin
305  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 67 Z28 sold at auction last weekend? on: October 30, 2013, 08:29:02 AM
All the classic car price guides that I have seen always show 67 Z's worth Much more than 68 or 69.

I am certainly no expert.  I am just one man giving his opinioin from his experiences.
306  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Drive shaft color code on: October 29, 2013, 08:08:06 PM
Search driveshaft markings... Grin

http://www.camaros.org/forum/index.php?topic=10811.0
307  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: GM silver for Rally wheels. on: October 29, 2013, 11:33:49 AM
*L*..  thanks Darrel!~     (IMO  GM Reconditioning black, which is a satiny, semi-glossy, semi-flatty black)..  Smiley


But did GM paint these wheels?
308  Model Specific Discussions / Trans-Am Camaros / Re: "Inside the Cars of the Trans-Am" and other articles on: October 29, 2013, 10:47:32 AM
Jon,
I just wanted to say thanks for posting all these amazing magazine articles for everyone to read..  Great history and knowledge in those pages..
309  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 1968 rs ss spare tire on: October 29, 2013, 10:21:46 AM
Disc Brakes?? Would that option make a difference on wheels??

Neat Car looks familiar

Jim


http://www.camaros.org/suspen.shtml#Wheels
310  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: GM silver for Rally wheels. on: October 29, 2013, 10:15:53 AM
Is the black on the back side of the wheels satin, semi-gloss, eggshell, gloss or....HuhHuh



Lol  Sorry I couldnt resist..   Grin
311  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Happy Fall ya'll ! on: October 29, 2013, 08:51:34 AM
Thumbs up..!!..
312  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 67 Z28 sold at auction last weekend? on: October 29, 2013, 08:27:38 AM
Regardless of production numbers the 69's are the more popular of the 3 which is why they "typically" draw more money.  67's falling 2nd.  In todays market it is coming down to if there is more than one person interested in a car on what its value will bring.  Obviously chances are higher for a 69 to sale for bigger money due to the popularity factor.  I would estimate that a 67 Z without a NOM engine would be in the 50-100K range.  Why such a large range?  Mainly due to the fact the market is very roller coaster right now on these cars.  More than one bidder on the same car will certainly raise the price.  The other wild card in this is you do not see as many 67 Z's go up for sale as often so this could potentially raise the price as well.  I am curious; as many here, as to what the hammer price will be for this car.
313  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 124379N561026 in database?? on: October 29, 2013, 07:52:16 AM
Both tags are fake.  Just my $0.02
314  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Antenna - Rear Quarter on: October 28, 2013, 08:35:14 PM
I know of 2 68's both originally AM radios, both non spoiler cars & one was rear & the other was front..  So I'm not sure there was a standard for non spoiler AM cars...

All spoiler cars were front fender regardless radio
AM/FM were front fender
AM with no spoiler I've seen both ways...
315  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: black on tailpan on ss cars on: October 28, 2013, 08:11:14 AM
Let me pose this question.  Could it be that different gloss levels were used on different years?
Pages: 1 ... 19 20 [21] 22 23 ... 39
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.092 seconds with 18 queries.