CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
July 30, 2014, 08:25:52 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
102496 Posts in 12091 Topics by 4669 Members
Latest Member: paulmanta
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 19 20 [21] 22 23 ... 55
301  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Educate Me on: February 22, 2014, 07:13:16 AM
Corrected pic of a Nova cowl panel

302  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Educate Me on: February 21, 2014, 10:06:58 PM
303  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Educate Me on: February 21, 2014, 09:28:09 PM
I thought the Nova had a thicker bar in the middle..

304  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Educate Me on: February 21, 2014, 08:51:09 PM
This panel came off a 67 Camaro but sure doesn't look like what I'm used to seeing..




305  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: '68 D91 stripe vs 396 Emblems on: February 20, 2014, 08:39:40 PM
Gap between wide and thin stripe is incorrect and too large.

67 not original paint.



You are correct.
306  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Nagging questions about parts and restoration direction on: February 20, 2014, 07:57:12 PM
My understanding is that this style label is 80's (not sure if that is a date code in the upper right hand side but it says 1981 F1  (June 1st or 1st week of 1981)






EDIT:

The ink stamp style stickers are of the 70's and all the computer printing is 80's and then barcode is late 80's - 90's.

The ones with the barcode are late 80's - 90's.  I could be completely off on this theory and I hope someone will chime in and enlighten all of us
307  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: '68 D91 stripe vs 396 Emblems on: February 20, 2014, 07:20:16 PM
67 not original paint.

308  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: '68 D91 stripe vs 396 Emblems on: February 20, 2014, 06:54:53 PM
Here is a guaranteed original paint and stripe 68.  Granted, its the D90 stripe which is different than the D91..



309  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: '68 D91 stripe vs 396 Emblems on: February 19, 2014, 07:12:12 PM
Car looks great Ed regardless.  The DX1 is like the D91 but at the peak of the valance panel it turns and runs up the hood as a thick pin stripe.
310  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Cowl Tag Check on: February 19, 2014, 10:55:30 AM
Again, just my opinion, but...

If the VIN tag stays on the original body, and each part replaced is done one at a time and documented with photos at each step, that is probably OK.

Moving the VIN tag from a car to another body is not OK. 

I understand that but what if the cowl & dash needed to be replaced and the tag & vin & hidden vins had to be moved to new pieces? Would that not be similar if not the same.  Im not busting your balls just wonder when the gray area ends and the line begins.
311  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Cowl Tag Check on: February 19, 2014, 10:11:01 AM
In my opinion, a "rebody" is the same as a "VIN swap" and should be handled the same.

I agree

But lets play devil's advocate for a minute:

Lets say a car is a complete rust bucket or had/has been totaled or was a previous track car (drag or road race) and it requires all new floors, firewall, inner & outer quarters, windshield and back glass channels, dash, trunk floor, trunk lid, doors and fenders.  Would that not be considered a "rebody" if all or most of those parts were replaced either with NOS sheetmetal or not?   

I guess ultimately my question is how far is too far..??..
312  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: '68 D91 stripe vs 396 Emblems on: February 18, 2014, 07:45:40 AM
Great looking car.  Makes me wish I would have put the DX1 back on my 69.
313  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Posting Tag Pic for ko-lek-tor on: February 16, 2014, 11:44:39 AM


314  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Correct Dated Water Pump for 67 L-35 on: February 13, 2014, 02:22:51 PM
There ya go!!  Its actually in the upper 40's today.  Feels like spring time!!
315  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Correct Dated Water Pump for 67 L-35 on: February 13, 2014, 02:16:05 PM
Yes I was just using them as examples..  I should have said "Just like cylinder heads, intakes as long as you are within a month or two months before the build date of the engine"..  If you go a month or two on the dates of the build date of the car or engine you would be in the clear.
Pages: 1 ... 19 20 [21] 22 23 ... 55
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.163 seconds with 18 queries.