CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
January 31, 2015, 03:38:27 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
109332 Posts in 12659 Topics by 4866 Members
Latest Member: jamejia1967
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 63 64 [65] 66 67 ... 81
961  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Heat Riser - Purpose of Spring? on: June 04, 2012, 06:48:41 PM
Hi Steve,

  See the image from my restored L35 for the location. I checked my survivor L35 and it has the same spring too.

962  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Heat Riser - Purpose of Spring? on: June 04, 2012, 06:04:20 PM
 It is supposed to keep pressure on the shaft so it doesn't chatter from the exhaust pulses. It doesn't hook into the shaft, it just presses against it.
I see yours doesn't have the small barrel spring on the shaft the weight pushes up against when fully open.

963  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Firewall Pad on: June 04, 2012, 05:33:09 PM
Mike S.,

Any status/opinions on the firewall pad you ordered?


Hi Paul, is interesting. Let me put the pictures together and I'll post them.

964  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: New Guy Needs Help Correlate Cowl/VIN with Options on: June 04, 2012, 05:03:12 PM
....... If the car truely didn't have a radio, or had a rear antenna (an hence an AM radio) from the factory, there will not be a holde drilled in the A piller forward of the passenger door where the antenna cable went from the interior of the car to the space behind the front fender.  If theres a hole there, then the car had a radio when it left the factory.


 Are you absolutely sure about that being no hole in the front pillar if there was a rear mounted antenna ordered?
I do recall seeing a rear antenna 67 (option on trim tag too) with the front hole (looked like it was punched) with a plug in it.
The AIM refers to it as 'existing hole' and I figured it was like so many holes punched and plugged based on options.

965  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Original Drivetrains on: June 04, 2012, 04:55:09 PM
I agree, to me the original cars are very cool to look at, and to me it doesn't matter if its a six cylinder or V8, Mustang or Camaro. Seeing the original patina and preservation of a classic, is  a little special. I still enjoy restored cars, but the survivors and drivers are what I appreciate. There will always be trailer queens out there, and they are part of the hobby as well.....

I agree entirely. I'm a 'stock' guy. When at a car show and walking towards a car that looks stock on the outside and if I see an aftermarket air cleaner when getting closer, I'll continue to walk past it. But if it passes the air cleaner housing test, then I'll stop and give it a long study no matter what brand or model as long as it is stock.

966  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Where to buy new steering and suspension components ??? on: June 04, 2012, 04:46:31 PM
Parts for my Harley are made in China. It's sad to know even HD joined the corporate whores to use cheap foreign labor.
I heard GM may move the manufacture of the Volt to China.

967  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Original Brake Hoses for '69 Z28 on: May 29, 2012, 05:17:52 PM
Hi Gary,

 I had my 4 piston calipers sleeved with SS inserts in 1987 and still holding well though I did install new rubber seals recently just for the sake of it.
I had a local shop by me called Apple Hydraulics ( )  install a brass sleeve for $95. They do brass and SS but I opted for brass to save some $$$$.
They do complete rebuilds or just install a sleeve and you rebuild it. I went for option 2 and got the rebuilding kit locally at LI Corvettes ($28) and saved quite a bit ( over $100 total ) doing the rebuild myself.
968  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 67 under body dichromate primer? on: May 29, 2012, 02:57:05 PM
 I found the answer to my own question from a buddy who works in a paint shop. He used a rag with some compound and was able to get a deep gloss from the yellow that was like the topside body color gloss. Cool idea! The red primer area he rubbed had a slight shine but nowhere like the gloss as the yellow. He did this to show me the difference between the two to rule out the yellow being a form of primer. He said it was likely darker because of the red oxide primer under it vs. the gray primer used on the topside and the fact that is was mainly thick overspray even though the whole under carriage is yellow over red oxide primer right up into the tunnel and stops at the floor meets cowl line. I still donít know how a reciprocating sprayer would reach so far under unless the fan size was very large, and seeing other examples of the same coverage on other posts, I'll go with what I found.
 So, if the results donít follow the theory, keep the results and change the theory.  Wink
  So this is how Iíll restore the underside

969  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Original Brake Hoses for '69 Z28 on: May 29, 2012, 01:50:42 PM
  I have rebuilt both and it's impossible to see the SS inserts on either the M/C or calipers when installed.

970  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: 67 repo door skin experience? on: May 27, 2012, 06:52:09 PM
 Thanks Daniel. I may go with the whole door shell from dii being their are no P/N's stamped into it and I checked out the ribbing and it's the same as the original door.
Either way if I get the skin or whole door, I'll post my results about it for future reference.

971  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / 67 under body dichromate primer? on: May 27, 2012, 02:46:30 PM
I know this topic has been discussed may times before. While scuff sanding the underside of my 67 NOR 5B convertible I see the whole underside is covered in what I thought was butternut yellow paint. But what is confusing is this appears in the upper parts of the transmission tunnel too. I have researched and read the articles about the underside colors and the finishing process on CRG, so the underside is said to be anywhere from red to black to gray but I find it hard to believe the underside would be completely painted in the body color considering the painting was automated (minus blackouts). What I have is not just overspray because it is too uniform and applied on purpose and on areas outside the robotics reach.

 In the attached picture (Pic 1) the underside layers are as follows from bottom to top:
raw metal --> red primer --> yellow coating (paint or primer?) --> Rustoleum I applied in the 80's.

Looking at the topside body color picture (Pic 2) the layers are from bottom to top:
Raw metal --> factory gray primer --> factory butternut yellow paint --> (repaint) gray primer applied in the 80's --> paint applied in the 80's

The picture with the paint sample (Pic 3) of the 80's butternut paint job was scuff sanded the same grit as the underside to remove the gloss. As you can see it is noticeably lighter than the yellowish hue of the underside as well on the chassis rails that are completely opposite where the robotic sprayers overspray would hit.
If this isn't paint then this leads me to believe that a yellowish primer was also used, possibly a form of dichromate?

972  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Console Gauges on: May 26, 2012, 05:58:24 PM
The gauges in my '67 console have a white sticker with the broadcast code and date.

973  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / 67 repo door skin experience? on: May 26, 2012, 04:00:46 PM
  What I thought would be a routine door skin replacement on my left door turned out to be a surprise once I removed the original skin and went to install the NOS one.
A spare L&R 67 NOS set I bought in the mid-80's and stored since then turned out to be a mis-matched set. The right skin is for a '67 but the left is for a '68 Camaro so that is useless to me.  Shocked
Looking for a NOS panel on ebay averages $500. That's an expensive price to pay for a GM sticker on the inside.
  Has anyone installed either a repo skin or a complete repo door assembly? If so I would love to hear your experiences on fit and quality.
I am looking at Dynacorn and they boast of superior repo parts but then most repo places do.

Thank you,
974  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Maintenance / Re: Recommend a master cylinder rebuilder? on: May 26, 2012, 08:53:38 AM
Whitepost has some interesting cars there and looks like a top notch shop.
I received a separate email suggesting a place called Apple Hydraulics. I checked out their web site and leared they are only 10 miles from my house.
I stopped by there yesterday to drop off the master cylinder and got to speak to the folks there.
Anyhow, they will clean, glassbead and sleeve the cylinder at the cost of $95.
I'll be installing the rebuilding kit myself (including the rear drum line check valve)

Thanks for the reply!
975  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Restoring engine back to points: what's needed? on: May 24, 2012, 07:46:03 PM
 If you have the resistor wire intact and a stock type coil (2 wires), then it should work fine poviding the distributor is properly indexed.

Pages: 1 ... 63 64 [65] 66 67 ... 81
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.088 seconds with 18 queries.