CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
November 24, 2014, 11:18:55 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
106525 Posts in 12421 Topics by 4787 Members
Latest Member: Oilron14
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 61 62 [63] 64 65 ... 77
931  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Color coded brake end fittings on: May 10, 2012, 08:15:36 PM
 I'll go with the steel lines then. I know item such as ball joints, brake hoses, repo tires, etc... we have no choice if the design has changed through the years, but for brake lines we still have a choice.
The ones I made in the 80's still look great other than the armor is slightly oxidized in some areas but that was due to my eventual stopping of an annual application with a preservative oil.
Hmmm....maybe steel with SS armor is the trick.

Mike
932  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: 68 rear mounted antenna on: May 10, 2012, 08:10:33 PM
 Like Joe said, straight. Viewing from the rear it should have an ever so slight lean inwards (4 degrees per the manual).
This is where the correct base is a must to get ththe right pitch.

Mike
933  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Power steering bracket on: May 09, 2012, 07:05:56 PM
Hi Paul,

 Have you tried here?
http://www.nationalimpala.com/ObsoleteChevroletParts.pdf
 I put this on my search list for other friends and if I find anything I'll send you a PM.

Good luck in your quest,
Mike
934  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Beware 9N675878 DZ/Title/Tags for sale on: May 08, 2012, 07:36:08 PM
LOL!!!  Cheesy

And...no caution fan sticker!

Well done Oaklyss....I'm still laughing here Wink

Mike
935  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 68 Camaro TH400 oil pan on: May 08, 2012, 06:24:15 PM
 Like Bob's, my 67 TH400 has no markings and is plain steel. It definitely doesn't look close to the one on eBay.
I've seen a few 1st gen Camaro's with the TH400 and never recall seeing a bold or any stamping as that one.

Mike
936  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Beware 9N675878 DZ/Title/Tags for sale on: May 08, 2012, 12:56:43 PM
 That does it!
The next car I get is going to be a Revell model car  Cheesy

Let's see someone fake that!

Mike
937  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Did console gauge cars also have a low oil pressure switch? on: May 08, 2012, 12:50:10 PM
 Thanks Kurt…Interesting reading!
So, one certainty with mass production is uncertainty.  Roll Eyes
Would it be safe to assume then that in this case of when the brass fitting was discontinued in place of the grommet, that there would not be an overlap of use or would an overlap be possible to empty inventory? Bobs 5E car has the brass and my earlier 5B has the grommet. It’s sounding more like my car had the dealer mod done at some unknown point in time.

Mike
938  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Color coded brake end fittings on: May 08, 2012, 10:25:48 AM
Hi Bob,

  I have seen SS lines on restored to factory appearance cars and they stand out easily. I couldn't figure that out......restore to correct gloss, texture, dates, parts, over spray, etc..etc..etc.....and yet use SS lines when the correct was plated steel. Go figure!   Grin

Mike
939  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Ground wire on 67 PS Rag Joint on: May 07, 2012, 06:34:11 PM
Hi Bob,

 That plating looks to be either cad or zinc. I'd go with cad though because it held up nicely. Just a guess.
There is no copper anything besides the metal strap. The bolts and nuts are steel (looks black oxide).
 Many replacements now use a copper bolt. I haven't seen one in person so I suspect those are copper plated bolts. IMO, an all copper bolt and nut would be too soft
compared to steel under shear loads so I doubt it would be used in such a critical area.

Mike
940  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Did console gauge cars also have a low oil pressure switch? on: May 07, 2012, 01:23:16 PM
Mike,
Interesting point but why didn't my NOR 05E ( I bought in 5-15-70 from King Car rental) have it done at the dealer. As a dealer modification I am not sure if the mod. ( no recall) was done on all new product or only if the customer complained of an oil leak.
When car rental agencies buy new cars do they physically go through a dealership?
Bob

Not sure what the rental cars went through back then. In 1967 I was in 6th grade! I'm thinking now that the previous owner had a leak so the mod was performed. That's the only thing that sounds logical at this point. I'd sure like to see more input to this from owners of 67's with the gauge option.

Mike
941  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Did console gauge cars also have a low oil pressure switch? on: May 07, 2012, 10:38:33 AM
Bob,
 
  In regards to Brian K's comment earlier ".......My 11E build 67 RSSS has this set up owned since 1988, ....."   which setup is he referring to...brass of grommet?
Which plant was your Camaro made? I wonder now if mine had the retro done afterwards by the dealer.  Huh

I feel like the German peeking from behind the branches (Arte Johnson) from Rowan & Martins ...."veddy interesting"  Cheesy

Mike
942  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Did console gauge cars also have a low oil pressure switch? on: May 06, 2012, 08:55:16 PM
Hi Bob,

   Now that is interesting in that it looks like the brass fitting was still used despite the design change around March 67 and the drawing date in April showing the grommet and your May car has the smaller hole indicating brass.
   I guess at this stage it would be good to see others chime in if their oil gauge uses a grommet or the firewall brass junction.
Lets start a separate thread to solicit input!?  Huh
Mike
943  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Ground wire on 67 PS Rag Joint on: May 06, 2012, 08:45:53 PM
What about your 67 LOS. build, it has original P/S correct?
Bob
Hi Bob,
 Correct.....Original pump. Attached is a picture of it with the rubber bumper completely intact.
Julian date on P/S box is 032 7
So it looks like they were used in 67 (this picture) and up to early 69 (based on previous pictures I posted).

Mike
944  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Ground wire on 67 PS Rag Joint on: May 06, 2012, 12:42:29 PM
Hi Bob,

  When I restored my 67 ragtop in the 80's I removd the manual and installed a P/S gear box w/ rag joint from a '69 Camaro.
The Julian date on the 69 steering box is stamped 240 8
I since removed it and reinstalled the original manual steering box on the '67 but never sold the 69 yet so here is a picture of that rag joint.
It has the rubber bumpers though the upper shaft rubber has been worn away and the thick base is all that is left.
The P/N 780047X was readable except for the last digit which could be a 9 or a 0 (the rubber is nicked)
 As for the ground, my 67 manual joint uses the copper strip and never had any rubber 'bumpers'.

Mike
945  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: 67 camaro carb ? on: May 06, 2012, 11:51:06 AM
 I have seen the 7027211 carbs (rare to find, BTW) with dates as early as Feb 67. Your period may be at that transition period (just a guess) between the old and newer one. I'm sure GM must have depleted inventory before using the newer ones. The differences are the needle and seat design.
   Also, the linkage may be different between the 2 models. The earlier one use the larger sleeves at the carb throttle side and the 7027211 doesn't use a sleeve at the car throttle. The after market throttle linkage for the 67 BB doesn't fit the newer 211 carb correctly because the throttle side needs the large sleeves to properly fit. My 67 BB car has the 211 carb and also the 2 piece linkage that came with it when I bought the car over 30 years ago. My 67 LOS car that uses a different carb number all together also uses the 2 piece linkage.

BTW, a LOS car without AIR? I thought that was mandatory in 67 for California.

Mike
Pages: 1 ... 61 62 [63] 64 65 ... 77
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.084 seconds with 18 queries.