CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 24, 2014, 05:32:14 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
97547 Posts in 11720 Topics by 4581 Members
Latest Member: Cooper48
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 58 59 [60] 61 62 ... 65
886  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 1969 Z/28 open element air cleaner lid on: February 21, 2012, 09:16:32 AM
 The only other 2 possibilities is the original lid was rusting and the owners replaced them with what was the current lid or the factory started to phase in the second type earlier than1970 as suggested in this group. I suspect the latter is more possible.

887  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Maintenance / Re: Removing frozen hoses from necks on: February 20, 2012, 08:32:59 PM
Is it a good idea to grease up the fitting before you install a hose? Thats what Ive always done.Havent had any problems.

 I've used that method too with good results using a very thin film of white lithium grease before sliding the hose on. What gets captured under the clamped area does help facilitate the removal later.

888  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 1969 Z/28 open element air cleaner lid on: February 20, 2012, 08:26:50 PM
 Looking at the 2 black lids on my 67 L35's they both have the curved white lettering and format as shown in the example posted by USER-3965175.
Just a guess but is this a late run Z that has changes for the soon to be 70 model year lid?

889  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Maintenance / Removing frozen hoses from necks on: February 20, 2012, 03:07:45 PM
 Several times I have helped friends remove their radiator hoses only to find they either cracked the neck or gouged it using screw drivers between the hose and neck/nipples.
I showed them this tool and they said they have never seen before it despite working on cars for a while.
I figured maybe showing it here for those who have never seen it would save time and unnecessary repairs as a result of removing frozen hoses especially if you have a Harrison radiator (very $$$$ to replace).
  To use, carefully wiggle the point to slip it between the hose and neck. When it's under then push it around the neck and presto, it's freed!
You can get this at places like Pep Boys for under $10.

Hope it helps,
890  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 67 dg ralley wheel w space saver spare on: February 19, 2012, 10:37:55 AM

  Those dress and hair styles are back in style again! The wheel makes a revolution   Cheesy
891  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: "ML" Engine Stamp.. on: February 19, 2012, 10:29:45 AM
Matching numbers means THE engine the car came with from the factory.
I tend to agree but I think this "numbers matching" word is a paradox in the car collecting arena.

  This reminds me of former president Clinton's famous quotes:
"I didn't inhale"
When asked about a sexual relation with Monica "It depends upon of what the meaning of the word..."

  I do remember reading somewhere a case where a buyer bought a "numbers matching car" and later found it was a restamp and took the seller to court. The seller was not found guilty because numbers matching didn't mean original. So "numbers matching" is a play of words, IMO.   Undecided

  After getting back into this hobby late last year I have done a lot of reading catch ups and the topic of restamps caught my attention and the seemingly wide spread use of it because of that human addiction called greed. But I can't help ponder, what is accepted and what is not, has come down to a pick and choose acceptance in his hobby. I mean, you can now get date coded glass and tell a potential buyer it's original glass. Nobody gets uptight when someone says I got dated glass, hose clamps, wires, etc...  but a VIN or other date codes (alternators and distributors), then the conversations gets explosive. What is the real case here...the act of restamps or the potential value that can be obtained from a restamp that causes a pick and choose practice?  Huh
  In the case of this so called Yenko, it's out right fraud. But this hobby needs to get a clear legal definition of what a 'numbers matching' car is so the word game semantics can stop and potential buyers and sellers know what is legally correct in definition and what is not.

Just my 2 cents
892  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Bucket Seat Back teather cable on: February 18, 2012, 05:14:16 PM
In post #76 I said my NOR was gray with gray ends, but looking at the picture Boston14 posted, that is more of what I have. It looks more like an off white (towards gray) to me.
So it looks like we are back to either "white" or black cables with either gray or black heat shrink ends.

893  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: REAL nice Gold Z/28 on eBay, Cowl Tag Correct? on: February 18, 2012, 10:05:10 AM
 Seems like a lot of work went into this restoration. I like the attention to paint marks and other finer details.
But I'm curious why the oil pan bolts aren't painted if they went that far in details and why the grade 8 rear differential cover are needed.
For a Jan 69 born date, the bell housing looks to have a casting date the 4th week of April. Likely 1968? Seems way too soon for a Jan 69.
 I'm just nit picking. Anyhow it looks like this was shredded in previous posts here a while back.
Pretty car though.

894  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 67 BB vacuum advance hose stripe color? on: February 18, 2012, 09:33:17 AM
  Now that's a very likely answer.   
  Looking at both hoses now I see the smog valve hose has no color stripe and doesn't have those characteristic ribs. I'd guess that somewhere in the cars first 13 years (the last 6 of that 13 spent under beach chairs in a garage before it was sold) the smog valve hose was replaced and maybe used a section of that to replace the vacuum hose. I can certainly accept that reasoning.

895  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 67 Battery cables 67 V8 with AC on: February 17, 2012, 09:30:36 PM
 I double checked and at first it looked like a Y but after gently rubbing a smudge near it, the X appeared.
Definitely  XP

896  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: "ML" Engine Stamp.. on: February 17, 2012, 05:02:19 PM
Hi Steve,

4. "M" font incorrect. Others too?

I'm not sure if the M is wrong though in the posted picture I agree it just doesn't look right.
I have seen 3 types of M fonts on BB pads. Some with the middle extended to the bottom and others 1/2 way down.
The 3rd is what visually looks like a an ever so slightly wider character width size for both type of M's.
My feeling is that the supplier of the font stamps may vary?

The 8 digit engine stamp is a dead give away.
Ask the seller to come to this group to try to justify the originality or the buyer to warn him/her.

My hats off to you for alerting the potential buyer of this fake!

897  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / 67 BB vacuum advance hose stripe color? on: February 17, 2012, 03:09:38 PM
 In looking to freshen up my 67 L35 engine compartment I cleaned some hoses including the vacuum advance hose with soap and water.
What I thought was a dirty white stripe is actually a red stripe. In the resto parts catalogs I see only a white stripe
being advertised as a correct replacement. I uploaded 2 images of the stripe and the opposite side with what looks like the correct hose rib lines.
Does anyone have an original hose to compare colors? This was on the car when I bought it 30+ years ago.

898  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: "ML" Engine Stamp.. on: February 17, 2012, 09:54:08 AM
This is fun in a way...  Cheesy
Here is another one when digging deeper...
The VIN range for this car is around August 1969 per CRG
The block assembly date of 0101 (what the heck is that number 7 doing here!?) is Jan 1969. IMO, way too early for any COPO car.

But hey....afterall it is a 'number matching' car!
Then again, I have 'matching' features of Tom have seen it before....2 eyes, 2 ears, 1 nose and mouth.  Grin

899  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: "ML" Engine Stamp.. on: February 17, 2012, 08:44:51 AM
 I'm not too up on 1969 Camaro's so I can't find 10 things  Grin  but what little I did find in the few minutes before heading to work are:
Block casting is a 427 ci. On CRG a 427 would be a COPO
The ML would indicate a COPO 9560 ZL1 aluminum engine vs. a COPO 9561 iron block. This block is iron
I'm guessing that the ZL-1 block should be 3946052?
The VIN does not appear on the CRG COPO listing
The engine code has a tilted numeric 1 (the second in the sequence)
The engine code is using numeric 1 in place of the letter I (but that may be OK if I and 1's are used interchangeably)
The engine code has 8 characters instead of the 7 I normally see on BB pads
Were ZL1 engines supposed to painted black?

That's all I can quickly come up with.
Gotta head to work!
900  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 67 Battery cables 67 V8 with AC on: February 16, 2012, 10:04:13 PM
Hi Bob,

Not sure if this helps, but I checked my 67 LOS w/L35 (no AC of course) that still has the original cables and the P/N are:
6289139 ZM for +
2987212 YP for -

Pages: 1 ... 58 59 [60] 61 62 ... 65
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.081 seconds with 18 queries.