CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
January 31, 2015, 08:12:51 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
109335 Posts in 12659 Topics by 4866 Members
Latest Member: jamejia1967
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 81
16  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Trim tag and engine stamp opinion on: December 28, 2014, 06:57:50 PM
 I don't know much about stampings but the one thing I immediately found odd was the condition of the motor with pealing paint, grease dust on heads and block and the missing intake compared to the relative good condition of the booster, clean firewall and wire harness tape.

Just my observation,
Mike
17  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Merry Christmas to All! on: December 24, 2014, 10:01:48 AM
 Merry Christmas and Happy Hanukkah to all.

Mike
18  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 1967 SS350 Decode? HELP? on: December 24, 2014, 09:59:21 AM
2m is powerglide, no turbo 350 in 67 camaros and turbo 400 was a big block only.
  My one 67 L35 w/TH400 has the UOIT listing 2M as M35 "PWR GLIDE AUTOMATIC"
I believe this to mean the Fisher body was prepared to use an automatic transmission in general and not indicative of the model transmission used.

Mike
19  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: 67 bumper bent? on: December 21, 2014, 08:44:22 PM
Hi Jim,

  It would be easier if you posted a picture to get a better idea of what is looks like.

Mike
20  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Correct Dip stick on: December 21, 2014, 12:14:32 PM
Hi Bob,

  The imprinting is exact between both blades including the hash separators (both gauges use : as a separator)
The gauge measurements are the same for thickness and width.
In the picture you will see differences in the curves nearest the handle being opposite each other and the 0214MZ motor gauge having more of a downward angle as viewed with the bells lined up with the paper line. I don't know if this is by design or the stick is just bent. The metal is very flexible so I don't think it is bent. The buttons are both pink (salmon) though the later one is square. As for shapes, I have seen other dipsticks of different engine sizes with varying roundish shapes so maybe it's the mold shape.

Mike
21  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Correct Dip stick on: December 20, 2014, 10:32:45 PM
Hi Bob,

   The Chevelle guys are sure into details.
Read reply #20 for a lot more info.
http://www.chevelles.com/forums/showthread.php?t=342864&page=2

Mike
22  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Correct Dip stick on: December 20, 2014, 10:01:49 PM
Mike,
After engine assembly and painting, on engine dress line.
Could you check the dipstick length from the top of the bell to the add mark for me? Should be 18 1/8" or 18 1/2" = or - depending which dipstick you have.
Good info on pans, think #3 (3929257) is correct for 1st gen Camaro. Grin
Bob

 The measurements are as follows:
T0214MZ - 18 1/8" exactly
T0308MW - 18 1/2" exactly
 Both have the pink button

Mike
23  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Correct Dip stick on: December 20, 2014, 04:24:38 PM
January L35 and March L78, so early L35's would have the purple buttons and L78's should have the Pink (salmon). I have know idea when the L35 transition  to the pink (salmon) buttons took place or if early L78'S could have the purple buttons. Revision dates do not reflect  when actual production started but early L35's should have purple buttons.
Bob
 Was the dipstick installed when the motor was assembled or when the car was. I'm thinking it was when the motor was assembled.
My earliest motor, stamped 0214MZ, has the pink (salmon) stick.  Based on some of your posts about date changes then it may be early Feb the color changed from purple (?) to pink.
  As some extra info about oil pans I came across this from the Chevelle group (I assume the 396 Chevelle has the same pan):
http://www.chevellestuff.net/tech/articles/oilpan/index.htm


Mike
24  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: A Friend in Need... on: December 19, 2014, 08:56:30 AM
Sorry...but after reading the title I had a flash back and just could not resist quoting the opening line in The Hollywood Night's movie:
Remember:
A friend with weed
is a friend indeed.

  OK...with that out of my system, I wanted to say I'm glad things worked out for you in retrieving your car with the assistance of folks here.
In a way, CRG is like a car club and we are all its members.  Wink

Mike
25  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Correct Dip stick on: December 18, 2014, 06:04:19 PM
Bob,
    Interesting.....When I lay the gauges side by side and align the ":" marks, the 05B motor stick is slightly longer as seen visually at the handle end.
What part of the seal is the measurement made to......the closest to the bell or the seal edge closer to the stick end.
I can take measurements. As for the color, it still looks pink (salmon) even on the part that sits into the handle. I would think that hidden area would not fade.


Mike
26  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Correct Dip stick on: December 17, 2014, 10:20:40 PM
 I can't see any P/N but do see stampings near the end as follows-
From bottom tip to up direction:  ADD:     :FULL    ENGINE OIL     M (looks like an upside down W)

Mike
27  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Correct Dip stick on: December 17, 2014, 09:53:17 PM
 That's a good question...pink or faded red. I had to check again.
I was able to remove the button from one dipstick easy enough and comparing the
exposed to the non-exposed area they look the same pink color.

Mike
28  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Correct Dip stick on: December 17, 2014, 07:17:23 PM
 Would it be the same as an L35? If so then mine are both pink. The sumps should be the same size.
Engine dates are T0214 and T0308
I assume the sticks were installed when the motor was assembled?

Mike
29  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Interesting Craigslist Finds on: December 17, 2014, 03:59:38 PM
Here's a funny one...  http://sfbay.craigslist.org/pen/cto/4808445196.html

Current seller keeps getting flagged and removed because of this "warning" listing.

Caution: Some language may be inappropriate for children.  Lips Sealed

Paul
I can't blame someone for trying to make $$$ by flipping a car, especially if he/she bought it at a low market price. If anything, I would have been really pissed at the original seller for breaking a deal and switching buyers.

Mike
30  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: if you could go back and redesign the 67/8 .. or that other one, on: December 12, 2014, 08:20:20 AM
I have seen fairly late model dodge trucks here with the bed side rotted out and you can see a rope looking piece in there that didn't help the problem
  You beat me to that observation, Bill. Same here too on Long Island...many new trucks with wheel opening rot. Looking closely at them I can see no matter how much care the owner does to the truck, that is still rotting from behind the paint and from an inaccessible cavity.
  It still amazes me how many old cars I see at shows that are still around even though they weren't designed to last what, maybe 10 years? Remember when reaching 100K miles on a car back then drew reverence and awe? Yep, they now needed and got some cosmetic help (sort of like people when we get older) but the fact remains if it's made in the USA, it's here to stay ("your mileage will vary" )  Wink

Mike
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 81
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.094 seconds with 18 queries.