CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
December 18, 2014, 01:26:06 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
107468 Posts in 12503 Topics by 4810 Members
Latest Member: rustoleumm
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 79
1  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Correct Dip stick on: December 17, 2014, 10:20:40 PM
 I can't see any P/N but do see stampings near the end as follows-
From bottom tip to up direction:  ADD:     :FULL    ENGINE OIL     M (looks like an upside down W)

Mike
2  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Correct Dip stick on: December 17, 2014, 09:53:17 PM
 That's a good question...pink or faded red. I had to check again.
I was able to remove the button from one dipstick easy enough and comparing the
exposed to the non-exposed area they look the same pink color.

Mike
3  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Correct Dip stick on: December 17, 2014, 07:17:23 PM
 Would it be the same as an L35? If so then mine are both pink. The sumps should be the same size.
Engine dates are T0214 and T0308
I assume the sticks were installed when the motor was assembled?

Mike
4  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Interesting Craigslist Finds on: December 17, 2014, 03:59:38 PM
Here's a funny one...  http://sfbay.craigslist.org/pen/cto/4808445196.html

Current seller keeps getting flagged and removed because of this "warning" listing.

Caution: Some language may be inappropriate for children.  Lips Sealed

Paul
I can't blame someone for trying to make $$$ by flipping a car, especially if he/she bought it at a low market price. If anything, I would have been really pissed at the original seller for breaking a deal and switching buyers.

Mike
5  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: if you could go back and redesign the 67/8 .. or that other one, on: December 12, 2014, 08:20:20 AM
I have seen fairly late model dodge trucks here with the bed side rotted out and you can see a rope looking piece in there that didn't help the problem
  You beat me to that observation, Bill. Same here too on Long Island...many new trucks with wheel opening rot. Looking closely at them I can see no matter how much care the owner does to the truck, that is still rotting from behind the paint and from an inaccessible cavity.
  It still amazes me how many old cars I see at shows that are still around even though they weren't designed to last what, maybe 10 years? Remember when reaching 100K miles on a car back then drew reverence and awe? Yep, they now needed and got some cosmetic help (sort of like people when we get older) but the fact remains if it's made in the USA, it's here to stay ("your mileage will vary" )  Wink

Mike
6  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: if you could go back and redesign the 67/8 .. or that other one, on: December 10, 2014, 01:47:38 PM
Wide tires were used back then.  They just had to jack the rear of the car up to clear the quarter well.  Another check mark for 7 & 8s for not needing as much jacking..












Yep....raise that baby. Back in the day it was Gabriel HiJackers....with the air hose fitting drilled under the lower rear valance.

Mike
7  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: if you could go back and redesign the 67/8 .. or that other one, on: December 10, 2014, 11:18:51 AM

Remember that:
...................................

2. Making the inner rear wheelhouse tubs wider would have compromised the rear seat hip room dimension ..............

 I agree. It was cramped enough spending time in the back seat at the drive-ins back in my youthful wild days  ( Mike checks over his shoulder for the wife's whereabouts )  Cheesy I can only image how cramped it would be if it was narrower!

Mike S.
8  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Flash Chrome - Recommendations for a reputable shop? on: December 05, 2014, 10:53:55 AM
Have you tried Crane Corvette Supply? They make the best accurate aftermarket BB valve covers. I think they also do flash chrome, though I' am not sure if it includes BB.

Mike
9  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: New guy, New project ' 67 on: December 05, 2014, 09:19:40 AM

Decklid - they used that most of the way thru 67 production. There was an earlier version, but I'm not sure LOS ever got that version.
I'm also curious on the decklid date. Should have asked that. No hurry. Smiley

Thanks!

  The lid with the center elongated hole was for the '66 period, correct?

Mike
10  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: paint code on leaf spring by front eye bolt, on 1969 camaro on: December 04, 2014, 10:11:41 AM
 There was a discussion about paint coded leaf springs (it was used) for 1967 and possibly early 68. I am under the assumption that 67 was the only year used before starting to use decals.
The discussion can be found here: http://www.camaros.org/forum/index.php?topic=9739.0

Mike
11  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Example of a fairly accurate ebay ad .. 'ez restoration'... :) on: December 03, 2014, 07:09:28 PM
 The description is humorous! I'm curious if someone actually buys it.

Mike
12  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Baldwin Motion VIN numbers? Or others, Yenko etc? on: December 03, 2014, 09:25:49 AM
 I suspect those VIN's are well guarded due to fraud.
This link talked about it for Motion:
http://www.nastyz28.com/forum/archive/index.php/t-228922.html

Mike
13  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: door top on 67 w/ std interior on: December 02, 2014, 11:40:47 AM
 Here is a topic about that from 2009:
http://www.camaros.org/forum/index.php?PHPSESSID=mdv2o3niniq3lb1etg6vsgdr16&topic=5632.0

  Both, my 04B LOS and 05B NOR, have the metal tags.

Mike
14  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: door top on 67 w/ std interior on: December 02, 2014, 08:13:35 AM

This answers the The GM jam decal question I have. What is the build date on this 67?

Steve,

  Just curious...what question did you have about the sticker?

Mike
15  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: door top on 67 w/ std interior on: December 01, 2014, 07:58:07 PM
 Gosh, I completely forgot the OP asked about the rear panels too.
Great shots MooneyDriver!  Looks like your doors show signs of adhesive too.

Mike
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 79
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.115 seconds with 18 queries.