CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
July 26, 2014, 06:14:33 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
102383 Posts in 12080 Topics by 4664 Members
Latest Member: jjonesls1
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 8
46  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: correct 67 early 68 subframe bolts on: February 24, 2013, 08:29:52 AM
Chick thanks, I see your link has some good pictures, now that I scrolled down through it all.
47  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: correct 67 early 68 subframe bolts on: February 23, 2013, 08:31:06 PM
Thanks Chick, I did post on that sight already.  They are not that easy to find.  I guess nobody is reproducing that style. Does anyone have a picture of a original one that they could post?

Paul
48  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / correct 67 early 68 subframe bolts on: February 22, 2013, 05:43:34 PM
Does anybody know where to get correct 67 or early 68 sumframe bolts?  These bolts have a recessed middle section on bolt head.
49  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Research Topics & Reports / Re: Original 67-69 Camaro driveshafts - information requested about your car on: February 20, 2013, 06:50:16 PM
I have original unrestored drive shaft, The car is 67 04A norwood convertible, 250 engine 3 speed manual trans, measurement form u joint to u joint is 50".
50  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Original P T B marks on: February 16, 2013, 03:44:30 PM
I can't tell if it is paint or ink,    so when you them all together is that or is that not authentic ?
51  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Original P T B marks on: February 15, 2013, 09:28:01 PM
No A/C
52  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Original P T B marks on: February 15, 2013, 08:42:04 PM
Thanks for posting, Is it normal to have these marks here under blower and on driver side tulip panel? most of the cars I have seen have these marks on upper cowl section.
53  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Original P T B marks on: February 15, 2013, 06:44:42 PM
On my april built Norwood car these marks are not where I see them on other cars, I know they are original, I have pictures if anybody could post them.
54  Model Specific Discussions / 6-cylinder Camaros / Re: Front Swaybar on: February 08, 2013, 03:55:49 PM
My 04A cvt was NOR built, just to add more data
55  Model Specific Discussions / 6-cylinder Camaros / Re: Front Swaybar on: February 07, 2013, 05:35:16 PM
May be all convertibles got swaybar?
56  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Build Quality in the Muscle Car Era on: February 05, 2013, 06:10:40 PM
I have had both Mustang and Camaro, I can tell you first hand GM quality way way better,  Mustang bottom of trunk was top of gas tank, lots of body vibration on mustang, subframe on Camaro I feel was much better than fords shock towers. By the way to grease front fittings on mustang you had to cut holes in shock towers (look at any original mustang you will find home made holes in towers)   Mustang does not handle as good or ride as smooth and even though Camaros have there typical rust spots a Mustang will rust EVERY WHERE places that you would not believe or at least I couldn't.  Hence the nick name Rustang! Don't get me wrong I liked my Mustang too they just are very poor Quality. Never had a Cuda
57  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Hello from a newbie. on: February 01, 2013, 08:16:44 PM
"camaro" means friend in French?
58  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: GM decal on door jamb on: January 29, 2013, 06:19:01 PM
Thanks the picture on that link is just how my original doors look!
59  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / GM decal on door jamb on: January 29, 2013, 06:03:19 PM
Does anybody know if the GM tin decal that is factory installed on the door jamb of early camaros is in the approximate same place most of the time? I have original doors and this decal seems to be higher on these doors over all the high end restored cars that I have looked at.  Or is there just no set place that the factory set them?
60  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / 67 owner's manual on: January 02, 2013, 07:26:21 PM
I have a April first week built car, in the glove box from when I bought the car over 20 years ago is a original owner's manual (no doubt it's a original) it is a third edition witch is April 1967. On all other original cars that I have seen with april build dates (most later than mine)  have second edition manuals. My vin ends in 7N203208. Any body no why?
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 8
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.088 seconds with 18 queries.