Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - 67conv6cyl

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 34
31
6-cylinder Camaros / Re: Highly option 6 cylinder car
« on: May 14, 2023, 01:02:58 AM »
The reproduction panels seem to be getting better and better. As you can tell from earlier pictures the car looks to have a surprisingly good cowl section…….unfortunately that’s it for good original metal, rear tail pan didn’t appear to be rust that bad at all, however it dented bad enough that it can’t be saved.

 The Original 230 6 cylinder engine runs well and has great compression.

32
6-cylinder Camaros / Re: Highly option 6 cylinder car
« on: May 13, 2023, 11:36:45 AM »
Well…not “yet” mine 😉

33
6-cylinder Camaros / Re: Highly option 6 cylinder car
« on: May 12, 2023, 12:11:20 PM »
Updated on highly option 6 cylinder car…..looking like it will be restored back to original with original motor!

34
Originality / Re: What are the factory correct 67-68 convertible sunshade vinyl piping clips?
« on: March 17, 2023, 08:06:40 PM »
Looks like there’s a difference between hard top and convertible chrome ends…I know Vinly & fabric materials are also different from hardtop to convertible.

35
Originality / Re: What are the factory correct 67-68 convertible sunshade vinyl piping clips?
« on: March 16, 2023, 12:27:31 AM »
Original Vinly April 1967 convertible sun visor

36
Research Topics & Reports / Re: What is the correct quarter panel arm rest ash tray insert?
« on: March 16, 2023, 12:20:53 AM »
I learn things on this site all the time…..never knew Firebirds were smooth!

37
Research Topics & Reports / Re: What is the correct quarter panel arm rest ash tray insert?
« on: March 15, 2023, 11:59:10 PM »
67 was not smooth, they actually have more groves…here is my factory original unrestored rear armrest on my convertible. April built Norwood car.

38
General Discussion / Re: Camaro Books
« on: February 27, 2023, 10:52:54 PM »
In my opinion they do a great job in the 67/68 manual showing differences in the 67 and 68 models…it’s actually good to see them both in the same manual because you can compare the different parts easily thus allowing you to determine if your part is correct for your year (and sometimes even build month) I have not seen the 69 manual however I was thinking it would be okay if they combined all three years. I learned from the manual some of the subtle difference between the two years that I didn’t know before.

39
General Discussion / Re: Camaro Books
« on: February 27, 2023, 02:57:52 AM »
I think I have every Camaro book and I feel the 67/68 legends manual is a must have if you are restoring a 67 or 68 to factory correct. I have enjoyed learning things from this manual.

40
Promotional Events and Concept Cars / Re: Panther concept - 4 headlights
« on: February 25, 2023, 07:42:57 PM »
Does anybody know why Square headlights were not allowed back then?

41
6-cylinder Camaros / Re: Highly option 6 cylinder car
« on: February 25, 2023, 07:40:14 PM »
No sale

42
1967 - Orphans / 1967 protect-plate
« on: February 16, 2023, 05:31:24 PM »
124377N163368

43
Foreign Camaros / Re: German 1967 Camaro
« on: February 15, 2023, 02:20:17 PM »
I love that Dana hood!

44
Restoration / Re: 1967 rs ss
« on: February 12, 2023, 01:08:25 AM »
Looking at the posted pictures…..I would bet the farm it’s a real RS SS. Looks to original to be a clone
Trim tag 3L 4P would clinch it.

45
Decoding/Numbers / Re: VIN tag problem
« on: February 10, 2023, 10:00:30 PM »
What I find truly amazing is….everyone knows that today there are more fake  Z’s then they probably built originally…..one of the most cloned cars on the planet and even the clones that are admitted clones bring good sale prices.

Anybody that has one that’s real has gotta feel good knowing how desirable their car is…..after all not to many people cone cars that aren’t desirable to the masses.

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 34
anything