CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 18, 2014, 01:45:58 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
97157 Posts in 11687 Topics by 4578 Members
Latest Member: ronhill
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 19
31  Model Specific Discussions / Trans-Am Camaros / Re: 1967 Trans-Am season review on: October 03, 2013, 10:28:51 PM
Cool stuff Jon... You have a great collection!!
32  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Missing trim tag on: September 29, 2013, 09:31:14 PM
CA looks at both if the car was so equipped from the manufacturer. However, the vin and build date is all they concentrate on. They couldn't care less about the options.
33  Model Specific Discussions / Trans-Am Camaros / Re: 1967 Trans-Am season review on: September 29, 2013, 03:46:22 PM
Jon, thanks for posting that service letter. There is some great info on there; not that the info isn't known. It's just great to see it all on one early document. Very cool piece of history!
34  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Missing trim tag on: September 29, 2013, 03:15:18 PM
Protect-o-plate, original invoice/docs or UOIT
35  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: WOW! Chance to buy a COPO from Original owner on: September 28, 2013, 12:44:23 PM
IT is a COPO if they were realistic at all about the price it would have sold and the details would be known.
I know from the person who offered it that 125k was turned down with out hesitation... they think it is worth 250k.



Non original motor, needs restoring... 125k seems like a fair offer to me. The seller needs to check out some of the auction results.
36  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: WOW! Chance to buy a COPO from Original owner on: September 22, 2013, 10:41:46 PM
Nothing posted or advertised has authenticated the claim.
37  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: First Ford Mustang sold to public story on: September 15, 2013, 09:37:26 PM
Like any 'new' car that comes out, being the *first one* to have one loses it's significance once many are on the road.   THE MOST significant new unit which never loses it's significance is the SNxxx0001.. ie. the 'lowest sn' built for sale to the public. sometimes it's snxxx001 and sometimes it's not.   The first C5 Corvette built which was placed into public hands was Snxxx007, which was given to the NCM, and auctioned off for about a year to see who won it!

Completely agree. To me, the lowest serial number would be preferred. Sure, it's cool to say (and prove) that you have a car sold on the first day of availability, but there were probably a lot of them sold that day. And who knows exactly what day that was.
38  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: First Ford Mustang sold to public story on: September 15, 2013, 01:11:32 PM
It's apparently the first one sold until someone else comes up with an earlier bill of sale. And if they are on the same day, someone will need a time stamp on theirs to claim that they have the first. And don't forget about time zones...
39  Model Specific Discussions / Trans-Am Camaros / 2013 Watkins Glen and Lime Rock HTA events on: September 09, 2013, 09:18:07 PM
I hate to see that.
40  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: bell housing on: August 26, 2013, 09:24:20 PM
Neither of the above pics indicates to me that the bellhousings were completely painted but I did notice orange overspray on both of the clutch forks.

But they look more painted than less, which I believe is the point.
41  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: Steering Column Sticker on: August 24, 2013, 06:43:18 PM
Nice job!
42  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Sales receipt VIN only number off on: August 24, 2013, 01:25:15 PM
Anyone else think the vin on the pad seems a little off or is it just me?

Looks like some good and some bad in it and that makes it hard to tell for certain without better pics. But I agree, it looks suspicious.
43  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Sales receipt VIN only number off on: August 24, 2013, 01:02:56 PM
Was 68 different than 69 where the cost of an upgraded engine was over and above the cost of the SS equipment?
44  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Sales receipt VIN only number off on: August 23, 2013, 11:00:33 PM
My guess is that receipt is for a car the dealer could have traded for; that's why they knew the vin and the receipt says deliver ASAP. Another reason I think that is because the option cost for the 396 is not on it.
45  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Caveat Emptor on: August 20, 2013, 09:34:08 PM
Interesting how all of the pics are clear except the trim tag.
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 19
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.08 seconds with 18 queries.