CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
October 31, 2014, 03:27:07 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
105859 Posts in 12353 Topics by 4762 Members
Latest Member: HarryQ
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 21
31  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 67 Z stamp on: May 16, 2014, 09:37:04 PM
Nice color combo. Tach is likely correct, pad is suspicious.
32  Model Specific Discussions / Trans-Am Camaros / Re: Sig Hansen A/Sedan '68 Camaro on: May 12, 2014, 09:41:19 PM
Great stuff Mr. Hansen. Thank you for sharing your memories, and look forward to more of them!
33  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: 1969 Z28, One Owner Carolina Blue Crossram JL8 on: May 01, 2014, 10:49:17 PM
Neat looking car, but I doubt it gets close to the estimate.
34  Model Specific Discussions / Trans-Am Camaros / Re: Ideas to share concerning 1:18 '67-'69 GMP Penske Donohue Camaros. on: April 23, 2014, 09:43:44 PM
Thanks for the great info guys. Mike K., sorry to get off topic.
35  Model Specific Discussions / Trans-Am Camaros / Re: Ideas to share concerning 1:18 '67-'69 GMP Penske Donohue Camaros. on: April 22, 2014, 09:38:26 PM
Quarter-panel challenged. I noticed it's not running the T/A shaker hood scoop. Was that not approved by the SCCA?
36  Model Specific Discussions / Trans-Am Camaros / Re: Ideas to share concerning 1:18 '67-'69 GMP Penske Donohue Camaros. on: April 09, 2014, 09:51:00 PM
Mike, nice to see you post again. I've missed the updates of your great work.
37  Orphans - documentation or VIN-stamped drivetrains - in search of the original cars / 1967 - Orphans / Re: 7L159206 M 20 on: April 04, 2014, 09:39:30 PM
Are you sure about the last 7?
38  Model Specific Discussions / Trans-Am Camaros / Re: Trans-Am cheating fact or fiction ??? on: March 28, 2014, 10:57:31 PM
Some good postings Al!
39  Model Specific Discussions / Trans-Am Camaros / Re: Trans-Am cheating fact or fiction ??? on: March 27, 2014, 10:55:26 PM
Mo,
                     Back in 1968 when I took my entire life savings and decide to go Trans-Am racing I knew that I would be in tough against the heavily fund factory teams  maybe I was a bit naive but I thought that at least I would we would be racing on a level playing field............ To me when the rule books say your car has to way 2800 lbs. not 2650 or less and your engine should be 5 liters  not 6 or 7 liters.........Nascar spends millions of dollars to ensure that  all teams adhere to the rules and you can bet your ass that if any of their competitors were caught with an over sized engine they would be gone for the season.
   When we were racing back in the day we were playing to packed houses everywhere we went........ Maybe someone should have earmarked a little more of the attendance money for tech inspectors.

AL

Al,

I completely agree with you. I'm not advocating cheating, just saying that you have to be willing to do what others are doing if you want to level the playing field. As for NASCAR, did you hear the comment that Chad Knaus made to Jimmy Johnson on TV last year? This stuff still goes on at every level.

http://www.sbnation.com/nascar/2011/10/26/2516121/chad-knaus-jimmie-johnson-nascar-talladega-damage-car-audio-chase-2011
40  Model Specific Discussions / Trans-Am Camaros / Re: Trans-Am cheating fact or fiction ??? on: March 26, 2014, 09:45:56 PM
There's an old racers moto that says "if you cheatin, you aint tryin". Cheating or not, you have to look for the loopholes if you are going to be competitive. That is true today as it was then.
41  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: info on yenko/copo's on: March 20, 2014, 09:50:15 PM
I don't see where William said when the first COPO was built.
42  Orphans - documentation or VIN-stamped drivetrains - in search of the original cars / 1967 - Orphans / Re: 1967 documentation list - updated 3/6/2014 on: March 06, 2014, 10:49:47 PM
Wow... missed by three vin's.
43  Model Specific Discussions / Trans-Am Camaros / Re: Windshield / Rear Window retainer clips or straps on: February 23, 2014, 05:19:55 PM
The Shelby GT350-R's had a unique short rear window. I don't think is was as much about air pressure as it was about reducing drag.
44  Model Specific Discussions / Trans-Am Camaros / Re: Windshield / Rear Window retainer clips or straps on: February 22, 2014, 10:20:33 PM
Primarily, the clips were to prevent the front and rear windows from "popping out/off" of the car. As you said Rob; retainer clips. They were available from speed shops, but I'm sure most were hand made, as our shop did. As for when they were required, that's a good question....I don't remember when they weren't.
45  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Paper tag found under carpet 67 Camaro on: February 19, 2014, 11:28:35 PM
That is a carpet tag. No date code reference. Your Huh are;
Carpet
Trenton
Inc.
Manville
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 21
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.082 seconds with 18 queries.