CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 23, 2014, 07:53:03 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
97496 Posts in 11718 Topics by 4581 Members
Latest Member: Cooper48
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 15 16 [17] 18 19
241  Model Specific Discussions / Trans-Am Camaros / Re: Interview with Gary Morgan, Trans-Am racer on: May 21, 2012, 10:30:23 PM
Jon, the price was lower than I thought it would go for, but compared to some other cars that went across it was actually decent money. The reserve came off at 150 so the seller must have gone in with low expectations. It's a good thing it didn't have a Hemi in it!

Fred

242  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: EARLY TRUNK LID on: May 21, 2012, 09:50:01 PM
So did the early NOR trunklid not get an emblem?
243  Model Specific Discussions / Trans-Am Camaros / Re: Interview with Gary Morgan, Trans-Am racer on: May 20, 2012, 05:16:38 PM
Sold for 160k.
244  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: New reproduction 1967 door lock knobs on: May 20, 2012, 04:09:16 PM
Jon, Are the chrome knobs shaped the same as the ones in your first two pics?

245  Model Specific Discussions / Trans-Am Camaros / Re: TRACO Fans on: May 13, 2012, 12:34:38 PM
Thanks for sharing your memories Pigpen. Please keep posting as you recall them. It's great to be able to put personal experiences with what we read.
246  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: 67 camaro carb ? on: May 06, 2012, 02:18:16 PM
In 1967 the LOS plant built cars with and without smog systems. Cars delivered in CA (and presumably special ordered with the equipment for out of state sale) got it; normal out of state delivery cars did not.
247  Model Specific Discussions / Trans-Am Camaros / Re: Duntov on Binders --- Zora Duntov discusses brakes circa 1968 on: May 05, 2012, 12:48:01 PM
Yeah...and an alarm!
248  Model Specific Discussions / Trans-Am Camaros / Re: Dana Chevrolet on: May 05, 2012, 12:44:20 PM
I thought the same thing looking at that picture. I wonder why Dana didn't get cars from NOR? Since four of the first eight Z's went to the west coast and their obvious connections it would seem logical. Any idea how they got around the homologation rules?
249  Model Specific Discussions / Trans-Am Camaros / Re: Duntov on Binders --- Zora Duntov discusses brakes circa 1968 on: May 05, 2012, 12:26:07 PM
Jon, Thanks for posting this article; it confirmed at least one thing for me.
250  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: Original radiator cap? on: May 01, 2012, 01:58:23 PM
Wow...that's nice! Can you give us that don't know him his contact info? Thanks
251  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: 1967 exhaust tip - picture of original on: April 21, 2012, 09:51:13 PM
Is he making lefts and rights?
252  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 67 CAMARO CALF TRIM TAG on: April 15, 2012, 01:22:59 PM
Searching the CRG site shows your QS axle to be 3.07 with standard brakes. I have seen printed elsewhere that QS axles are metallic brakes. Have you checked that?
253  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: Odd find on: April 15, 2012, 12:30:39 PM
Was the roll test done before or after the car was completed? If after, would the sheet be under the carpet?
254  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: 67 CAMARO CALF TRIM TAG on: April 07, 2012, 06:22:28 PM
Just wondering if your car has power brakes; are the fronts disc or drum?
255  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: Bill Jenkins on: March 29, 2012, 11:26:02 PM
A true racing and Chevrolet legend. Rest in Peace Grump.
Pages: 1 ... 15 16 [17] 18 19
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.092 seconds with 18 queries.