CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
December 18, 2014, 06:31:20 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
107458 Posts in 12502 Topics by 4810 Members
Latest Member: rustoleumm
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7]
91  Model Specific Discussions / Trans-Am Camaros / Re: Old Bits That Still Work - Muncie Transmissions on: September 29, 2011, 07:38:56 PM
I am a Ford guy and even I would not put a 9" in a Penske Camaro. That is just wrong. They ran them with 12 bolts back then, why not now. You can even get completely new 12 bolts these days.  Don't even get me started about small block Chevys in a Ford!!
92  Model Specific Discussions / Trans-Am Camaros / Re: Sunoco fueling rig on: September 21, 2011, 07:12:49 PM
This is a cap I had made for a Mustang I am doing.





93  Model Specific Discussions / Trans-Am Camaros / Re: Sunoco fueling rig on: September 21, 2011, 06:54:40 PM
The black part on the top that is hinged at the back comes to a point to form a "y" at the other end. The single black lever in the middle is folded over the end of the y to hold it closed.
94  Model Specific Discussions / Trans-Am Camaros / Re: Recommended Reading on: September 11, 2011, 10:48:42 AM
I was not aware of his accident either. I have been getting emails fron David Bull publishing for new releases of other books though.
95  Model Specific Discussions / Trans-Am Camaros / Re: Recommended Reading on: September 10, 2011, 03:18:35 PM
Any update on Dan Lipetz's new book?
96  Model Specific Discussions / Trans-Am Camaros / Re: 1969 Mid-Ohio Trans-Am photos on: September 09, 2011, 11:38:59 PM
Somewhere there was an in depth discussion about this on the Boss 302 site but I could not find it. In one of the old Trans Am videos ther is a very short clip of an AMC driver with his helmet on under the hood working the throttle. If you stop it in the right spot you can see the dominator carbs. An AMC guy later posted some info about the intake and possably a picture. It was a tall IR type manifold that was the reason for the tall hood.
97  Model Specific Discussions / Trans-Am Camaros / Re: 1969 Mid-Ohio Trans-Am photos on: September 07, 2011, 07:31:31 PM
It is interesting that the Holleys ended up on a Firebird and at least one AMX as their design was funded by Ford when SCCA decide to not let Ford run the Autolite inline carbs.
98  Model Specific Discussions / Trans-Am Camaros / Re: Monterey "Historics" on: August 22, 2011, 08:05:07 PM
What happened to the #77 car?
99  Model Specific Discussions / Trans-Am Camaros / Re: 1969 Mid-Ohio Trans-Am photos on: August 15, 2011, 06:57:37 PM
The set I have are all 5x5.
100  Model Specific Discussions / Trans-Am Camaros / Re: 1969 Mid-Ohio Trans-Am photos on: August 15, 2011, 06:56:08 PM
The magnesium 200s wheels had a problem with the center breaking out. This caused George Follmer to crash into the pit wall on the last lap of the last 69 race. I don't know why they ran Minilites and 200's at the same time. It may have been due to wheel availability. The Fords ran a 5x5 bolt pattern up front and a 5x41/2 in the rear due to the Lincoln front brakes. Here are some pictures of a 15x8 magnesium 200s that I have. It is rumored to be off of Revson's car. They have a 4-69 date on the back cast in.


101  Model Specific Discussions / Trans-Am Camaros / Re: 1969 Mid-Ohio Trans-Am photos on: August 14, 2011, 09:30:02 PM
The cans of racing oil bring up a question, what weight oil did they run back then? Could not see any numbers on the cans.
102  Model Specific Discussions / Trans-Am Camaros / Re: 1969 Mid-Ohio Trans-Am photos on: August 14, 2011, 05:53:13 PM
I like her Goodyear tatoo Wink
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7]
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.083 seconds with 18 queries.