CRG Discussion Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
September 02, 2014, 02:01:58 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Forum registration problems: Make sure you enter your email correctly and you check your spam box first. *Then* email KurtS2@gmail for help.
103798 Posts in 12189 Topics by 4702 Members
Latest Member: Subarurider
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: [1] 2 3
1  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / after the trunk floor, then what? on: October 16, 2011, 09:18:10 AM
Ive just installed a complete trunk floor on my 67, with quarter panels installed, what's next? There's the trunk drop offs, rear inner valence, etc. Don't wanna get my carriage ahead of my horse.
2  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / Re: replacing rear outer wheelhouse on: September 17, 2011, 05:10:20 PM
Stinger, I was afraid of that. I believe at least one side has more rust than the other. I was hoping I could replace it without dealing w the quarter. Thanx for the info
3  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Restoration / replacing rear outer wheelhouse on: September 16, 2011, 02:15:29 AM
  Ok, here's what im facing. I have a 67 Camaro, at the preset time, the lower rear quarters, trunk floor, taillight panel, rear inner valence, has all been removed. Both of my rear inner wheelhouses are in good shape, but the outer wheelhouse sections are bad on about 12" of the rear portion. My question is, were about to begin putting in a complete trunk floor, should I replace the outer wheelhouses prior to this or after? Also, since only a small portion of the rear of the wheelhouses are bad, could I use only a portion of a new wheelhouse, instead of replacing the whole thing. Also, is it even possible to replace a outer wheelhouse w/ out removing the entire quarter panel?Huh Please help!!!
4  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: console gauge car or not? on: August 19, 2011, 08:11:31 AM
67 RSS Thanx for the pics, nothing left to do but start untangling, ill let ya know what we find.
5  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: console gauge car or not? on: August 17, 2011, 04:31:21 PM
PetesL48, no such luck with the original L48. Im still looking though lol.

6  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / Re: console gauge car or not? on: August 17, 2011, 12:39:21 PM
67 RSS, I do have the original harness to the car n I believe they may be unaltered, but right now their in a spaghetti like mess in a barrel. There's ALOT of wiring on a rs/ss w/ air and deluxe int!!! Im dreading untangling it all but that should tell me. Could anyone post what the harness w/ the gauges would look like. When I got the car, the Speedo was replaced with a '68 cluster with the fuel on it, so that may also be a clue. IZRSS, thanks for the diagrams that will be helpful. FLYINGSKIBIKER, there was some rivets at the front of the tunnel where the front of the console would have been. Is that the ar your speaking of?
7  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Originality / console gauge car or not? on: August 14, 2011, 11:00:20 AM
 I'm in the process of restoring a 67 ss350 and was looking for clues on whether or not it originally had console gauges. The interior was almost completely stripped when I got the car.trim tag says it had a console but its gone as is the speedo/tach. I be heard there should be a small hole in the firewall behind the distributor are but my firewall has been "hammered" back to make more room for a modern distributor. I can see a hole that was punched halfway out, but it looks like it may have closed during the "hammering". Any other clues to look for??
8  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / Re: The dreaded " HOW MANY RS/SS' were made" question. on: July 20, 2011, 10:49:31 PM
Very,very true lol. Here's another thing I was thinking, correct me if u disagree, is a 67 more than likely the easiest 1st Gen to determine TRUE SS on? I know 68 is not. (not real familiar w/ the 69). I would ASSUME more ss/rs cars were built in 68 due to the fact more people were becoming more familiar with the Camaro, and realizing different options could be combined. ( There's not alot of advertisements that talk about combining the ss w/ the rs in '67 that I know of, granted, there was some) By the time 69 came around, people were very aware of the Z28, and that had to lessen the amount of some of the SS/RSs I would think, as more Z28/RSs were made. But being mostly familiar w/ the 67, in the last 10 years id say, I've seen a ton of camaros, at shows, a decent amount of SSs (of course these will be restored 1st, I would think, so that makes sence) but not very often a 3L 4P, 3L 4Y, etc. car at a local show. So anyhow, that's how I came up w/ that # for the 67s, basically just from the ratio I've seen over the years, of course there may be all these great cars out there hiding that NEVER come out, ya know. Its all fun detective work Smiley
9  Camaro Research Group Discussion / Decoding/Numbers / The dreaded " HOW MANY RS/SS' were made" question. on: July 20, 2011, 05:30:26 PM
 Ok, so its a FACT,well probably NEVER know how many TRUE rs/ss's were made, I know. BUT, over the years we've been to many shows, seen many camaros, n alot of us take time to look at the TRIM TAG (if the hood is up) to check the legitimacy. We know in 67 there was aprox. 31,000 TRUE SS's, without opening up a can of worms TOO big, what's the guestimation of how many was made each year (67-69) ? We all have that # in our head, but just for fun, let it out! I, say, 1967- 6,207 1968- 7,118 1969- 5,021. There, it had to be said, sue me lol.
10  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: L48 "actual " horsepower on: July 20, 2011, 05:15:35 PM
Man oh man WHAT A LINK!! Feel like my brains about to be too big for my skull lol. TRULY GREAT INFO, thanx KURT!  P.s. I know this thing HAD a proportional valve, where'd it go!! lol
11  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: LA/Norwood shipping on: July 20, 2011, 01:41:45 PM
 Dave, that's very, very true,good point! Sometimes we forget there WAS other plants besides NORWOOD and LA right?! Also, over time I've had questions arise about the CAMARO, and many of them, no matter what restoration handbook, magazine,etc. I read., JUST NEVER DISCUSSED some of them! After less than a week on the CRG, all were answered in GREAT DETAIL. Thank God for this site!
12  Orphans - documentation or VIN-stamped drivetrains - in search of the original cars / 1967 - Orphans / Re: 7L142552 VO202MS SS350 on: July 19, 2011, 12:33:49 PM
WOW, dangerously close to mine. L142305 shucks
13  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: L48 "actual " horsepower on: July 19, 2011, 11:17:05 AM
 Cool thanks for the info. That's around my ballpark figure. Probably slightly lower I assume on the 67 version
14  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / L48 "actual " horsepower on: July 19, 2011, 06:33:13 AM
 We all know alot of the horsepower ratings were underestimated, but does anyone know what the actual horsepower of the first L48s were? Or was it pretty close to the 295 rating?
15  Camaro Research Group Discussion / General Discussion / Re: LA/Norwood shipping on: July 18, 2011, 07:45:08 PM
 Wow, after today I realize that the plant the Camaro was built, has little to do with dealership.
Pages: [1] 2 3
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.448 seconds with 18 queries.